Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
surgery comes to mind, but then i am not very good at that. then i thought about reality pills, but he has rejected them soundly. So i guess, that only leaves a medicinal pat on the head and walking away in the hope that reality will, at some point, intercede with his perception of the world.
And if you can't see that "kind" is a meaningless term invented to obfuscate the issue and that evolution doesn't require any living organism to produce anything other than A VARIATION on what it is, then I very much doubt you can "help" anyone.
I don't think you even understand what evolution actually states. I've already made you look incredibly foolish when you became confused over the classification of dogs vs. wolves, and stated that wolves were a kind of dog - even though wolves existed before dogs did. You have zero understanding of biology or biological classifications, and yet you think you can lecture people on here about how evolution is false? You seriously need to pull your head from the sand and admit when you're wrong instead of running around in circles like you do. The fact that all you ever do is repeat your refuted arguments over and over again without any understanding of how they are flawed is proof of your ignorance on this subject and your refusal/inability to face the facts.
Absolutely. I would love to see his thoughts on ERV's. I hope he can be convinced to respond on something other than instagram (or whatever).
Seen coyotes give birth to a dog, so your wrong again
Yes, that sounds like an excellent idea.
Mostly hox genes for body plan, other genes controlling traits for the other parts. The differences between any species, animal or plant, is mostly based on the genetic code (which can be change and does change), the other influence is environment and epigenetics (which isn't fully understood, but still a natural phenomenon rather than supernatural).
And wolves produce wolves. Except, eventually, some of those wolves produced dogs - a subtype of wolf, just as wolves were produced by earlier canids and are, still, canids themselves. Everything produces what it is, but it does so with variation. Hence this "dogs produce dogs and cats produce cats" argument becomes not an argument at all, but merely a statement of something that evolution already fully accepts and aligns with.
See above. Done. Your argument is nonexistent.
No, not really, he's a Christian apologist and theologian. That's not the same thing at all.
His resume shows precisely what I've described; some distinction with respect to the philosophy of time, and basically another average joe face in the crowd otherwise. His primary distinction in the philosophy of religion is as an arrogant, overrated, and dishonest apologist posing as a philosopher.
Indeed; I always get a good chuckle when people talk about WLC as if he were a serious scholar- and then you can't find his name anywhere on the H-index for theology or philosophy of religion. Oops!
maybe a visual is in order. it somewhat simplyfies things for those who easily fall prey to mental exhaustion. Irish Wolfhound and Chihuahua mixDogs produce dogs, and fish produce fish. How enlightening. Of course, sometimes dogs produce dogs, only slightly different, whose descendants produce even more slightly different dogs, until eventually one of these slightly different dogs can't breed with the original dogs- and then it isn't really a dog anymore at all.
