Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But did God impregnate himself inside a womb, to be born with flesh, for without 'Human Flesh', he is unable to sacrifice himself, even though he is immortal, so the sacrifice was impossible, these
need to be addressed if God is Jesus.
Hang on . . . If the Christian bible declares Jesus is God and elsewhere that Jesus is the Morning Star, and that Lucifer is the Morning Star, then it stands to reason that God must be Lucifer!
Isaiah 14:12
12 “How you are fallen from heaven,
O Lucifer,a]">[a] son of the morning!
How you are cut down to the ground,
You who weakened the nations!
Revelations 22:16
16 "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to
testify to you about these things for
the churches. I am the root and the
descendant of David, the bright morning star."
Perfect!
I have no idea what you are talking about, but my post was tongue in cheek. We all know that the 'Lucifer' mentioned in Isaiah 14:12 is nothing more than a metaphor describing King Nebuchadnezzar (not the actual Roman Lucifer) and in Revelations 22:16 the Morning Star is another metaphor for the 'true light'. So, we see that the Morning Star can be used to describe a downfallen king and a risen King.Did you read posts 694 and 700? This is a rabbit-trail which are tactics of diversion designed to avoid an insurmountable argument.
Excuse me? You said, and I quote:I don't believe there is such a thing as something God "has to say". I don't recall anything alluding to this from a scriptural standpoint. From my perspective I see us all living under grace and God speaking because He chooses to do so.
No, I mean quite literally what I have said: God's revelation came to very few individuals -- Abraham, Moses, some prophets, some Apostles -- all in all, not very many people at all. And they -- and they alone -- are supposed to have transcribed those revelations perfectly, so that everybody else could put their faith in what is supposed to have been revealed.I’m not sure what you mean by “revelation to very few”. Are you a Jehovah Witness or similar, who believes only a chosen few are allowed to understand what they read in the bible?
Sorry, false comparison. You are putting this "teacher" in the place of God, suggesting that rather than "teach" me, he could somehow mystically "reveal." That's how God is supposed to work, not teachers. Nothing further to say on that.So how does one apply your assertion to everyday life?
Let’s say I have a teacher, voted best teacher in the world by peers and students. This teacher want me to know a lesson plan important to her and me. Can I now "trust I know it already" simply because its important to both of us?
I agree it would be great to learn through osmosis but wouldn't I have to put time and effort into learning the lesson plan first?
You are muddying word meanings again. "Looking to" and "looking at" do not mean at all the same thing in English. Nor do "cure" (for snake bite) and "answers" (to questions) have anything like the same meaning.Why insert differences when for all practical purposes there are none?
She looks to John for answers.
She believes John has answers.
Can you explain the “very clear difference” between “look” and “believe” here?
After all, there are some 38,000 Christians sects among the major Christian denominations, and they most assuredly do not all agree with one another. For God to have chosen this method of "getting the truth out" seems pretty dumb. And for a God, it would be monumentally stupid.
Well the entire Old Testament doesn't declare 'Jesus' to be a God, they are many characters that are named Jesus, a prominent example, Jeshua the high priest ( Ezra 2:2) , his name is 'Ἰησοῦς' in the Septuagint .
Zechariah 3:9
Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the branch.
Christians commonly use this verse, but 'Joshua' (Ἰησοῦ / Jesus) was the high priest living in the 5th-4th century, whom will bring forth his servant, the branch, this entire context deals with that period of time.
This 'branch or Sprout was Zerubbabel since Seed sprouts' as in the name Zeru ( Seed), and Joshua the high priest is always seen paired with Zerubbabel throughout Ezra-Nehemiah.
Ezra 5:2
Then rose up Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and began to build the house of God which is at Jerusalem
Ezra 4:3
But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the LORD God of Israel, as king Cyrus the king of Persia hath commanded us.
How does any of this relate to a 1st century nobody, who was never a King, High Priest, Savior, Didn't free anyone from captivity, didn't build any temples, never fulfilled the roles that Cyrus, Jeshua and Zerubabbel filled.
Thanks for the sermon, but it ought to be clear, even to you, that quoting scripture is probably the least likely way to get my attention.It is expected from an atheist to reject God, to reject His word, even reject God's method of communicating His word to His creation.
2 Timothy 3:12 Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 13 while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it 15 and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
1 Corinthians 2:
2 When I came to you, brothers and sisters, I did not come with superior eloquence or wisdom as I proclaimed the testimony of God. 2 For I decided to be concerned about nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and him crucified. 3 And I was with you in weakness and in fear and with much trembling. 4 My conversation and my preaching were not with persuasive words of wisdom, but with a demonstration of the Spirit and of power, 5 so that your faith would not be based on human wisdom but on the power of God.
6 Now we do speak wisdom among the mature, but not a wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are perishing. 7 Instead we speak the wisdom of God, hidden in a mystery, that God determined before the ages for our glory. 8 None of the rulers of this age understood it. If they had known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. 9 But just as it is written, “Things that no eye has seen, or ear heard, or mind imagined, are the things God has prepared for those who love him.” 10 God has revealed these to us by the Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. 11 For who among men knows the things of a man except the man’s spirit within him? So too, no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God. 12 Now we have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things that are freely given to us by God. 13 And we speak about these things, not with words taught us by human wisdom, but with those taught by the Spirit, explaining spiritual things to spiritual people. 14 The unbeliever does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him. And he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. 15 The one who is spiritual discerns all things, yet he himself is understood by no one. 16 For who has known the mind of the Lord, so as to advise him? But we have the mind of Christ.
Still running?
Thanks for the sermon, but it ought to be clear, even to you, that quoting scripture is probably the least likely way to get my attention.
But you did not even attempt to say anything about my point -- probably because you can't. And that point is this: the scripture you quote has been used to defend religious beliefs that have been in conflict with one another since those scriptures were set down. They've led to disparate and warring beliefs, and therefore there is at least one thing I think I can confidently say about them: THEY ARE NOT THE PRODUCT OF AN OMNISCIENT, PERFECT BEING. I accept them, therefore, as the product of fallible humans, nothing more.
From what? You the one unable to answer anything, why would a God contradict his immortality by sacrificing himself to himself, this means no sacrifice took place.
You claim the Bible declares Jesus is 'God' ( EL, Yahweh, Theos, which one), the Old Testament does not, so it's all down to the New Testament, the four contradictory Gospels and the Fake letters of Paul that are addressing Roman colonies.
I am ceaselessly amazed by how some believers here also believe that they are privy to the private content of my mind, that they know what I'm thinking and why.I know why. You cannot resist the temptation to express your hatred of the God that exists.
It might not have occurred to you, but I have a deep and abiding interest in human writing -- literature, poetry, fantasy, non-fiction, drama. You have no idea how much I've read, but my library might surprise you.Since this thread is about Scripture-"The Bible declares that Jesus is God" then why are you expressing your opinion if it is the least likely way of getting your attention? Why are you engaging in Scriptural discussions if you're not interested?
Your problem here is that you simply don't understand what my "point" is. I'll try to give you a hint:Why are you quoting Scripture to prove your point if you believe it is unreliable and merely man's fallible writings and nothing more?
I am ceaselessly amazed by how some believers here also believe that they are privy to the private content of my mind, that they know what I'm thinking and why.
Trust me, with all your magic, superstitious woo-woo, you really don't.
I will tell you what I think. You tell me what you think. I promise not to try to tell you what you think, and I insist that you do me the same courtesy -- especially since it in fact makes you look dumb, and I would regret that for you.
It might not have occurred to you, but I have a deep and abiding interest in human writing -- literature, poetry, fantasy, non-fiction, drama. You have no idea how much I've read, but my library might surprise you.
I am also interested in humans -- who we are, why we do what we do, why we claim love and yet kill, or to believe what we consistently show evidence that we don't believe at all. This is a subject called "philosophy," you might have heard of it. It has some resemblance to religious, except that it requires a little more rigour and typically rejects nonsense statements that cannot be demonstrated to have any truth value. Belief is something that is interesting to study in philosophy, but it is easy to show that it is not necessarily something that can be proved beneficial. (People buy lottery tickets because they believe they can win -- mostly this is an idiotic belief, but it doesn't stop many people at all. It is why so many intelligent people refer to government-run lotteries as "a tax on the stupid.")
Your problem here is that you simply don't understand what my "point" is. I'll try to give you a hint:
I am a humanist. I believe in reason, I believe in the essential worth of every human being, I hope for the best for humans now and in the future, I believe that can only happen when we learn, and I believe that learning is defeated by adherence to ignorant superstition.
I have demonstrated (38,000 warring sects in a single prime religion, Christianity) that scripture is provably incapable of delivering a coherent message -- and that it is therefore unworthy of the claim that it is the inspiration of an infallible deity. Therefore, you have to consider its worth from that perspective.
Post 694 addressing anonymous Romans
Titvs & Pavlvs.
God (θεός) our Savior (σωτήρ) - Titus 1:3
'θεός' in the Greek speaking world of the Roman empire, is a translation of the Latin DIVVS , so 'θεός' was the Greek name of 'Divvs Ivlivs'
On the Left , an image of Julius Caesar with the four Greek letters 'θ ε ό ς' , written on Metal, that's solid evidence.
This relates to the letters of Paul, for they are coincidentally addressing colonies founded by Julius Caesar and according to archaeology, the cult of Divvs Ivlivs' ( God ) was most popular at those locations , for example, Ephesus ( Ephesians) is where the temple of Dea Roman & Divvs Ivlivs Caesar was located. ( the Church of Ephesus ), note that the Church design, is also Roman, from the cult of of Divvs Ivlivs.
Caesar Clementia , the pyramidal roof . Caesar's cross of victory, 'Clementia' means forgiveness, a celebrated virtue of Julius Caesar.