If you understood genetics, you would understand it does
Wonderful. Then it should be easy for you to provide just one example of something the ToE says that has been proven. Since you are new let me tell you I have quit reading links because they NEVER provide any evidence. If you want to cut wand paste the evidence a link provides, I will address it.
Do you no know that one a theory has been proved, it is no longer called a theory.
Then present them. Please include the "how" the observation is a mechanism for a change of species.
How about the LAWS of gravity or the LAWS of genetics. Notice they are no longer called theories. I will let you guess why. If you can';t figure it out ask me and I will explain why theories become laws.
Theories or hypothesis do not contradict anything. Only proof can contradict a theory.
I will give you one example to chew on---the laws of genetics has proved that for an offspring to receive a characteristic, the gene for that characteristic MUST be in the gene pool of the parents. IOW no gene for fins, which pakicetus did not have, no kid with fins. FYI a mutation CANNOT change a leg into a fin. It is even more absurd to say a mutation can change a nose into a blowhole.
Don't tell me, give me an example.
Theories are never "proven". That is not in the nature of theories. No theories have or will ever be proven. However, most theories are also facts. If you understand that then we are further along in the game. If you don't then we need to back up. Theories are not something that grows up to become something else. Theories are the top of the heap in science. Science progresses from idea, to hypothesis, to theory (that is oversimplified, but essentially correct).
If you don't read links then what you are saying is that you don't want objective evidence of anything. What you are saying is that what you are looking for is an opinion war in which you can never lose or win. Even taking quotes from links does not allow for the context. Sometimes learning takes work.
Evolution is, first of all, a fact. I am not saying that the THEORY of evolution is a fact. I am saying that evolution itself is a fact. It is observed and is real so we call things like that a fact. That has nothing to do with science. That has to do with our common understanding of objective reality. To illuminate what I mean compare gravity, evolution, germs, and planetary formation. All 4 are facts. All 4 can be observed at some level.
Evolution is observed in DNA (at least a dozen different ways to do this with DNA), it is observed in the fossil record, it is observed in laboratory experiments, and it is observed in the real world (field studies, etc).
Hopefully, you have already read the 29 evidences for Macroevolution (the count has gone up from 29, but the name has not changed).
Laws of science are just laws. A theory does not become a law. Actually, laws usually go the other way.and become generalizations or only useful within a range. Laws do not do what theories do. A Law is a relationship (usually mathematical) between variables. Theories explain and make predictions. They have nothing to do with one another except they are both parts of science.
Now, let's get down to mutations. A (new) mutation is a bit of genetic coding that has changed since your grandparents. Without getting into the causes of mutations they are, by definition, a change in the genetic code that occurred in your parents or in yourself at some point. Mutations alter DNA. If the DNA changes and the DNA controls everything else with respect to the formation and structure of beings, then there is a change. Wings or legs do not poof into being in a generation. How mutations are modified (or eliminated) is by selection.
I hope that brings you up to speed. This is science and how it works.