People who believe and say they have evidence that the Earth is 6000 years old can say whatever they want about mutations but only the likes of you will take them seriously.That's fine . If you are afraid to see what they say
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
People who believe and say they have evidence that the Earth is 6000 years old can say whatever they want about mutations but only the likes of you will take them seriously.That's fine . If you are afraid to see what they say
I never said it was. You accept evolution without any proof.
In the Library of Congress it's under BS... oh the irony... Library of Congress Classification:Class B, subclass BS -- The Bible - Wikipedia
Its obvious you only goggle evolution sites, which never offer any evidence for their opinions.
Statements like that, which you can't prove, only expose your lack of understanding of mutations. You continue to make these statement but NEVER say HOW is works. That is because mutations do not work the way you think.
Another indication you are willing to accept opinions on faith alone. You lack scientific understanding of basic genetics and mutations.
Gen 17:19 - But God said, No, but you shall call his name Isaac and I will establish My covenant with him for an everlasting covenant for his descendants after him.
Luke 3:34 - The son of Jacob, the son of Isaac...
When you have an even remotely credible reason why almost all the scientists in the world who study genetics lack "understanding of basic genetics and mutations", let me know.
As I said before: if you weren't claiming it was obvious and basic, your position might be less ridiculous.
The irony is that evolution is just plain old-fashioned common sense-- all material items change over time by all indications, and genes are material items. And geneticists well know that, given enough time, genetic codes can change quite drastically from the originals.
Liar. Why do you lie in ways that are so obvious? Is not lying one of your "sins"?
As is 'bearing a false witness'...!
Anyhow:
Lines of evidence: The science of evolution
http://io9.gizmodo.com/8-scientific-discoveries-that-prove-evolution-is-real-1729902558
Human Evolution Evidence | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
As i said before you don't have a clue about genetics and mutations.
PROVE IT. Prove the above is FACT. Show your work-- let's see NON-BIBLE PROOF that ANYTHING you just posted is FACT.
Can you do it? Or is this more of your LIES?
Since you are new here, let me explain my rule. I have quit checking links.
You question what I have in writing. It is up to you to prove it is wrong.
Talk is cheap, prove I am lying.
Talk is cheap, prove I am lying.
As i said before you don't have a clue about genetics and mutations.
You're missing the point. It's not about what you or I know. You are claiming that the vast majority of scientists whose speciality is genetics and mutation, don't have a clue (as you put it) about their own subjects. That is an absurd claim.As i said before you don't have a clue about genetics and mutations. You can't explain HOW mutations are a mechanism for a change of species and you are afraid to see what the ICR says on the subject. All you can do is parrot the usual, evo rhetoric that has no evidence.