About the reverend father Georges, educated in a theistically oriented environment in the 20's and 30's, went to war in the 30's, dabbled in sophormic cosmology, never looked through a really complex telescope, and on and on. His coralaries and hypothesis on the evolution of cosmotic motions are quite unremarkable in veiwing from an isopatic direction, considering that the cosmos, as we now know, it to be totally random.
"God doesn't play dice." - Einstein
Looking at his discoveries:
(1) He entertains the assumption of a singular "singularity", I love saying that, that exists in a......
(2) "void", a nothingness without direction, motion, substance, or value.
Considering that there was no theoretical discovery of dark energy/dark matter at the time of his theory, and considering that we really don't know how it acts with regard to direction, motion, substance, or value today, I would say that he made a pretty accurate description of it.
(3) What contained the "singularity" for all those....I want to say years, but that would mean "time", and there wasn't any time then.
There could have been time, it just would have been "different" from time as we see it now. And is far as what contained it, it wasn't necessarily "contained" more so that it wasn't "expanded" enough for us to delineate one thing from another. The big bang is just the point at which we consider the matter, that we can observe, to have expanded to a certain point according mathematical theories of universal expansion.
What was the container made from, what was the "gravity" that held it together and how "hot" was it ? From what was this "plasma" made ?
The theory that I support would be that the "container" and the "gravity" would be somehow related to the Higgs interactions with dark energy/dark matter.
Dark energy seemingly "creates itself" for lack of a better word. So basically, it took dark energy a specific amount of time to break the surrounding barrier of Higgs particles which would have been surrounding the ordinary "matter", and once that barrier of Higgs was broken the massive amount of energy, both dark and normal, would have expanded outwards at an incredible speed.
Like a water balloon filled with water(dark energy), and different size magnetic objects(matter), and even smaller metal objects(Higgs particles). But all of this is happening, at first, in a zero gravity type environment so the water and particles would be expanding outward in all directions. This happens because the force of the dark energy expanding would counteract the gravitational pull of the matter at first.
Then slowly, the smaller particles would come together around the larger Particles due to the magnetic force(gravity) of the larger objects, as well as by the process of the smaller magnetic objects(small pieces of matter), being stopped from expanding rapidly outward by the dark energy, by the small metallic objects(Higgs particles), thus allowing them to be trapped by the gravitational pull of the larger metallic objects(large pieces of matter).
I have absolutely no idea how hot it was, but I'm sure you could come close to finding out how hot it was by using a variation of the Ideal gas law. Just take the estimated mass of all the matter in the universe, and compress it down to the volume that scientists postulate the universe was at the size of the big bang. Just find the pressure of plasma, and the universal constant of plasma, and you got yourself a temperature. Not my cup of tea though.
The Plasma was composed of all the "ordinary matter/energy" in the universe. Maybe dark energy/dark matter too. I don't really know how those would be separated/combined to be measured in this state.
(4) He says that the "singularity" suddenly inflated into the universe (void) that we live in, about 13 to 20 billions of years ago.
And? That's basically the same conclusion that scientists have come to using advanced calculations, measurements, and years and years of dedicated research.
(5) Where is the supposed "center" of the inflation point, and is it still going on, it's said that the inflation is still occurring.
Yes, according to calculations the universe is still expanding, and the best explanation of this universal expansion is that of dark energy. Since we can't really estimate or observe the "edge" of the universe, there really is no "center". Think of it like the balloon analogy I used earlier. Where is the center of the balloon once it pops?
If this "singularity" inflated from a central point, why do galaxies collide?
Galaxies collide because the gravitational pull of the galaxies overcomes the expansion force of the dark energy once you reach a certain "expansion point". The theoretical force of dark energy is extremely weak.
Why aren't all the galaxies, energies, matter, and other substances going out from the source of the "center" of inflation ?
They were at one point, and possibly could still be. There are observations that stars are moving farther away from each other. However, the reason why galaxies, energies, and matter aren't moving at an generally observable rate is because the gravity of these substances is generally stronger than the expansive force that dark energy is placing on it. Plus you have the possibility of Higgs particles slowing down the speed at which matter moves as well. Simply put, the force that expanded the universe can't overcome the force that contracts it. At least when it is not all concentrated in a small place, and the matter it acts on does not have enough gravitational pull to overcome it.
What changes the direction of galaxies to escape the center of the inflation?
Since there really is no center... nothing. But at the beginning, galaxies/matter was pushed outward by the force of dark energy. As that energy "balanced/equalized", the gravitational pull of these galaxies holds them in place, at least in relation to one another, but even this is not certain, as I mentioned earlier, they're are actual observations that show that stars are moving farther away from each other.
Was the "singularity" spherical, or was it focused when it inflated, does anyone really know?
The best way I've seen it described as a balloon with dots on it. Not sure on the exact shape/size of the balloon though. From a Philosophical standpoint, I would think some type of sphere would fit, as it is the most symmetrical, easily repeated shape in nature.
If the universe is random, as it seems to be, how far out into the "void" does it go, what direction are galaxies coming at us now ?
Can you cite some evidence that the universe is indeed Random? What do you mean by random anyway? By random, do you mean unpredictable by human rational logic?
To answer your question of how far it goes. We don't really know, other than it is constantly changing, and were not even sure of that. It seems as though the universe is constantly getting bigger.
As far as what direction are galaxies coming at us now. That would depend on complex formula of gravitational pull of specific galaxies in relation to one another, as well as the force exerted by theoretical "dark energy" on said galaxies, and how the Higgs particles effect the movement of matter. The scales of which all of these are extremely small, and as of yet, not totally determined. I will leave to you the calculation of how long it will be before the closest galaxy collides into ours epically and totally destroying us all.
I could continue but no one is really reading this crap anyway.
There wasn't ever a big bang, the Cosmos is totally random, stars are created and galaxies collide, and we all live awhile.
Good deal if you can get it.
I still love ya Mud, and I'm still reading your crap.
Whether the big bang is a good name for what theoretically happened I dunno. I think the big blow up and then pop sounds better to me, or maybe the balloon hasn't popped yet, and it should be called the big balloon blow up. And I still don't think God plays dice, but I agree with you that it's a good deal, and we are lucky enough to have it.
