My 2c on this one. My avatar is not just one of the greatest a*ses around, it's a bikini designed by Australian designed Lisa Blue. It shows the hindu goddess Lakshmi and in my mind, is pretty cool.
Portions of the hindu population didn't think so. Apparently using Lakshmi's image in such a seualised manner is incredibly offensive to their beliefs. They showed their dissaproval, not by writing strongly worded letters to the editor but by rioting in the streets and burning Australian flags. bear in mind this is Lakshmi, who the Oxofrd dictionary of Mythology describes as "Lotus-eyed, lotus-coloured, and decked with lotus garlands, she stands as the symbol of maternal benevolence, her full breasts the constant source of succor and delight."
Lisa Blue pulled the bikini from sale and apologised, wrongly in my view.
So my avatar is a representation of what I believe is one of the more stupid aspects of religion: your ridiculous attachment to symbols, under which I include books.
The more stock a religion puts on objects, the more vulnerable they are to attack. Who cares if someone burns a bible or a quaran? It's just a book. In your belief structure that person is going to hell anyway, so why get angry?
If your faith is SO fragile that this makes any difference to your world then you need to examine the strength of your beliefs.