The Cases Against Scientism

[rational experiences]

A man says earth O its owned evolved body in space.

Not owned nor theoried into form by any man human.

Volcanos began heavens formation...not owned nor theoried into form by any human man.

It was evolution in space. Movement of spirit cooling as O spinning as G into O split by middle heat DD back into OO.

Stated just GD to not misquote OO. As some ism did. O one body only.

A man doing ism....sun the ism says suns metals I equate are similar to why I built my machine. Where metals came from he says. Earth machine plus extended thesis reaction by earth sun thesis.

So virtually I claim my man's machine was a representative of the sun.

As known to his human brothers realisation....who does he think he is term...reasons humans said humans in science are evil. Satan ism. Earth is rock.

Exact reasons why.

First I say the mother of science exact where I live was Isis.

Then I theory it away.... the sis. No I as heat.

My confess of Sion. Even before invented I knew like the suns causes earths mass would be removed.

Hence I can't say I'm not evil as the man who decided to cause it. I knew already what I would achieve.

Humans named the scientist the destroyer. His ism.

As he quotes consciously me myself and I.

He theories Isis.
Then self claim as the thinker puts Isis back into his head. His ism. When he theories it removed...so he lied by mind conditions.

Self proclaimed God the man status.

When the ism said I will remove destroy my own thought thesis.

Why consciousness and claim by three was proven wrong and evil.

As he virtually said I can remove Isis but still own Isis when maths had it destroyed. Just by how I have myself said first only in conscious ownership. In thoughts only.

The healer teaching hence said you are a human man only.

You are a father man son only.

You must only entrain your thoughts as holy father holy son holy spirit heavens use as the man self. You are not a woman nor should you have thought about woman.

And never theory evil maths womb...woman lies from yourself God man the ist as it sacrificed your life.

Ism.

Begin thinking evil as a holy man doesn't say you are innocent. You were proven guilty and then taught why.

It's why spiritual teachings did not include satanisms science.

If they did you would never have believed science was holy.

But you do think science is holy.

A total self contradiction as humans today claim you are just one man conscious man.

Why teach three?

Brain entrainment said so you would honour woman...holy mother human holy sister human holy daughter human.

As you proclaimed her an abomination and a whore yourself...the man mind destroyed.

 

[chris baron]

Jonas Salk - scientism, a case study.

Book Review: "The Survival of the Wisest" by Jonas Salk; 1973.

Jonas Salk "the Developer of Polio Vaccine" revamps his theory and supposedly improves on Darwinism, in other words he's not talking about Darwinism anymore he's arguing that survival of fittest has now become the survival of the wisest (Scientists). What that means is: The Elite embodied in, reincarnated in the scientific class, now functions as the arbiters of 'Mother Nature' (God), and as a result they're going to have to put into place the structures and systems to decide who lives and who dies. So this is what this book is about . Another layer of a Darwinian cult of mass depopulation.

He begins the book by saying, 'the big problem that we face is too many people. Man will have to regulate and take the place of 'Mother Nature' because 'Mother Nature', he argues, has natural function of keeping balance and regulating population through disease and death, which he says are "Good". He says Man has to step up and take on that role and do the exact same thing. So here is your psychopath Darwinian cult leader arguing not only that; Salk says, Man is X-Men. You're all just bunch of mutants and because you're mutants, there's nothing wrong with the scientific establishment mutating you secretly with RNA viruses... Yes he says that in the chapter 7 named 'Mutations'; hoping to do all kinds of things that produce advantageous and disadvantageous effects, by mutating and testing on people through their RNA/DNA, and eggs of reproduction. Human female egg can be experimented on in his opinion and introduction of mass diseases, and cancers is necessary.

All of this is just another function of "Evolution". So, a bunch of scientific cult leaders kill us all and murdering babies is another "Naturalistic Process" . Because death, disease, and destruction are "Good" in his view because they're so called part of the dialectical evolutionary process, they produce a new stage of man. In short, in order to get to the next evolutionary stage you have to commit mass murder.

And who stands in the way of this evolutionary leap? Traditionalists! Yes, Traditionalists must die because they're anti-evolutionary and they don't accept the evolution of morals out of right and wrong into anything. Morals are part of an evolutionary process, if you do not accept this as true, which makes you regressive and you're moving back toward so called Protozoa stage, you need to die, and elite will decide who lives and who dies, because "we are God men and we as God men will kill you. "(page 70)

Then he discusses what it means to be pro-life? He says, it means to support evolution, and killing most of the population. That's truly pro-life according to him because that's the only way species will go into the future and through Transhumanism become immortal! But if you're 'Pro-life' in colloquial sense and you want to have children and oppose Euthanasia then you're actually Pro-death because you're not evolving.

Then he goes into bunch of speculations about Metaphysics, which is by the way the most extreme inquisition imaginable. I thought as a scientist one must be anti-dogmatic but no the Darwinian death cult duped so called scientists thinking that the scientific class was actually here to free them from the dogmas of superstition and religion. But the new cult of 'The Wisest' is most dogmatic ever and is going to kill that doesn't adhere to it.
Salk says 'if you're dogmatic, you're egomaniac...you're lesser evolved, religious superstitious,and moral objectivist, you need to die' but the ideas in this book are the most dogmatic thing ever! He advocates re-education camps to educate people about the fruits of death like Red Dawn type stuff it would not be communists it would be Red Dawn with Mad Scientists in your face. It would be Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye having you strapped down on the table and messing with you.

That's what Salk and likes of him dream of. He's hoping for all kinds of human experiments in this book as a father of inoculations on a mass scale. I wonder what means he might use to get what he and likes of him wants? Maybe inoculations? He mentions that inoculations might be a means, by which they could engineer evolution or devolution... by changing the genetic code and running experiments... that's what he says on page 53. All is flux, however Salk's position is not flux, because everything is changing and with the passage of time people may be proved wrong but this can never happen to Mr Salk's position!
His argument is self refuting at the most basic level. He contradicts himself in this book but it's okay because these kind of people are funded by Carnegie Mellon and Rockefeller establishment etc with a threat that if you don't join that scientific cult you're not going into future.

I want you to see the point of that
1) why would you trust mass vaccinations?
2) why would you trust the whole idea of mass vaccination from a guy who writes that book "The Survival of the Wisest" by killing everybody.

 

[ChristineM]

1) why would you trust mass vaccinations?

Because statistically those who are vaccinated tend survive better. Take the polio vaccine as an example, the disease is all but eradicated in countries with mass vacation programs yet kills up to 10% of the unvaccinated who contract the disease and leaves others with lifelong disabilities.

2) why would you trust the whole idea of mass vaccination from a guy who writes that book "The Survival of the Wisest" by killing everybody.

I don't, i, and most other "wise" people prefer reality as opposed to conspiracy theories

 

[chris baron]

Because statistically those who are vaccinated tend survive better. Take the polio vaccine as an example, the disease is all but eradicated in countries with mass vacation programs yet kills up to 10% of the unvaccinated who contract the disease and leaves others with lifelong disabilities.

"Most pediatricians would not survive without the income that comes from vaccines" Dr. Paul Thomas has 13000 clients. "My unvaccinated children are by far the healthiest"

 

[ChristineM]

"Most pediatricians would not survive without the income that comes from vaccines" Dr. Paul Thomas has 13000 clients. "My unvaccinated children are by far the healthiest"

Jolly good.

And many morticians could not survive without the income that comes from stupidity in ignoring health statistics

 

[chris baron]

Jolly good.

And many morticians could not survive without the income that comes from stupidity in ignoring health statistics

Nottingham City Council/Public Health have confirmed that they have no record of ANY of the following alleged "viruses" having been purified from a patient sample, by anyone on the planet: SARS-COV-1 Any common cold coronavirus, Ebola, HIV, PV, Influenza, Measles, Polio, Zika, ANY VIRUS on the Childhood Immunization schedule

 

[ChristineM]

Nottingham City Council/Public Health have confirmed that they have no record of ANY of the following alleged "viruses" having been purified from a patient sample, by anyone on the planet: SARS-COV-1 Any common cold coronavirus, Ebola, HIV, PV, Influenza, Measles, Polio, Zika, ANY VIRUS on the Childhood Immunization schedule

Did you know the price of eggs is flying...

And the way yo learn to fly is by throwing yourself at the ground and missing

Yes, they are just as irrelevant as your post

First, they are not alleged viruses, they are real viruses and can be scientifically and medically observed so i am pretty damn sure that Nottingham bla bla did not say "alleged viruses".

Second what does purified from a patient sample mean, what is the method used,

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nottingham City Council/Public Health have confirmed that they have no record of ANY of the following alleged "viruses" having been purified from a patient sample, by anyone on the planet: SARS-COV-1 Any common cold coronavirus, Ebola, HIV, PV, Influenza, Measles, Polio, Zika, ANY VIRUS on the Childhood Immunization schedule

Citation needed.

 

[Subduction Zone]

"Most pediatricians would not survive without the income that comes from vaccines" Dr. Paul Thomas has 13000 clients. "My unvaccinated children are by far the healthiest"

No he doesn't:

The Oregon Medical Board suspends the medical license of antivax pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas

 

[SkepticThinker]

Jonas Salk - scientism, a case study.

Book Review: "The Survival of the Wisest" by Jonas Salk; 1973.

Jonas Salk "the Developer of Polio Vaccine" revamps his theory and supposedly improves on Darwinism, in other words he's not talking about Darwinism anymore he's arguing that survival of fittest has now become the survival of the wisest (Scientists). What that means is: The Elite embodied in, reincarnated in the scientific class, now functions as the arbiters of 'Mother Nature' (God), and as a result they're going to have to put into place the structures and systems to decide who lives and who dies. So this is what this book is about . Another layer of a Darwinian cult of mass depopulation.

He begins the book by saying, 'the big problem that we face is too many people. Man will have to regulate and take the place of 'Mother Nature' because 'Mother Nature', he argues, has natural function of keeping balance and regulating population through disease and death, which he says are "Good". He says Man has to step up and take on that role and do the exact same thing. So here is your psychopath Darwinian cult leader arguing not only that; Salk says, Man is X-Men. You're all just bunch of mutants and because you're mutants, there's nothing wrong with the scientific establishment mutating you secretly with RNA viruses... Yes he says that in the chapter 7 named 'Mutations'; hoping to do all kinds of things that produce advantageous and disadvantageous effects, by mutating and testing on people through their RNA/DNA, and eggs of reproduction. Human female egg can be experimented on in his opinion and introduction of mass diseases, and cancers is necessary.

All of this is just another function of "Evolution". So, a bunch of scientific cult leaders kill us all and murdering babies is another "Naturalistic Process" . Because death, disease, and destruction are "Good" in his view because they're so called part of the dialectical evolutionary process, they produce a new stage of man. In short, in order to get to the next evolutionary stage you have to commit mass murder.

And who stands in the way of this evolutionary leap? Traditionalists! Yes, Traditionalists must die because they're anti-evolutionary and they don't accept the evolution of morals out of right and wrong into anything. Morals are part of an evolutionary process, if you do not accept this as true, which makes you regressive and you're moving back toward so called Protozoa stage, you need to die, and elite will decide who lives and who dies, because "we are God men and we as God men will kill you. "(page 70)

Then he discusses what it means to be pro-life? He says, it means to support evolution, and killing most of the population. That's truly pro-life according to him because that's the only way species will go into the future and through Transhumanism become immortal! But if you're 'Pro-life' in colloquial sense and you want to have children and oppose Euthanasia then you're actually Pro-death because you're not evolving.

Then he goes into bunch of speculations about Metaphysics, which is by the way the most extreme inquisition imaginable. I thought as a scientist one must be anti-dogmatic but no the Darwinian death cult duped so called scientists thinking that the scientific class was actually here to free them from the dogmas of superstition and religion. But the new cult of 'The Wisest' is most dogmatic ever and is going to kill that doesn't adhere to it.
Salk says 'if you're dogmatic, you're egomaniac...you're lesser evolved, religious superstitious,and moral objectivist, you need to die' but the ideas in this book are the most dogmatic thing ever! He advocates re-education camps to educate people about the fruits of death like Red Dawn type stuff it would not be communists it would be Red Dawn with Mad Scientists in your face. It would be Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye having you strapped down on the table and messing with you.

That's what Salk and likes of him dream of. He's hoping for all kinds of human experiments in this book as a father of inoculations on a mass scale. I wonder what means he might use to get what he and likes of him wants? Maybe inoculations? He mentions that inoculations might be a means, by which they could engineer evolution or devolution... by changing the genetic code and running experiments... that's what he says on page 53. All is flux, however Salk's position is not flux, because everything is changing and with the passage of time people may be proved wrong but this can never happen to Mr Salk's position!
His argument is self refuting at the most basic level. He contradicts himself in this book but it's okay because these kind of people are funded by Carnegie Mellon and Rockefeller establishment etc with a threat that if you don't join that scientific cult you're not going into future.

I want you to see the point of that
1) why would you trust mass vaccinations?
2) why would you trust the whole idea of mass vaccination from a guy who writes that book "The Survival of the Wisest" by killing everybody.

What the ... ?

 

[chris baron]

What the ... ?

this is scientism; that what many call "science" should guide public policy

 

[SkepticThinker]

this is scientism; that what many call "science" should guide public policy

It's a pile of inaccuracies and nonsense. Plus, you didn't cite your source.

 

[chris baron]

Did you know the price of eggs is flying...

And the way yo learn to fly is by throwing yourself at the ground and missing

Yes, they are just as irrelevant as your post

First, they are not alleged viruses, they are real viruses and can be scientifically and medically observed so i am pretty damn sure that Nottingham bla bla did not say "alleged viruses".

Second what does purified from a patient sample mean, what is the method used,

have you ever seen a virus? no. i suspect "Viruses" are spooks. this way the state can commit mass murder again and put the blame on a ghost. if a murderer can convince people that a ghost committed the deed then he escapes justice in this world.

 

[ChristineM]

have you ever seen a virus? no. i suspect "Viruses" are spooks. this way the state can commit mass murder again and put the blame on a ghost. if a murderer can convince people that a ghost committed the deed then he escapes justice in this world.

Nope, I don't have access to a powerful enough microscope. I don't really care what you and your conspiracy theories think of viruses, i know of people who have died of them.

FYI, some viruses under a microscope for your perusal.

 

[SkepticThinker]

have you ever seen a virus? no. i suspect "Viruses" are spooks. this way the state can commit mass murder again and put the blame on a ghost. if a murderer can convince people that a ghost committed the deed then he escapes justice in this world.

People who study them have seen them. You can see them too:
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-images

Ultrastructural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 interactions with the host cell via high resolution scanning electron microscopy | Scientific Reports

 

[rational experiences]

Jonas Salk - scientism, a case study.

Book Review: "The Survival of the Wisest" by Jonas Salk; 1973.

Jonas Salk "the Developer of Polio Vaccine" revamps his theory and supposedly improves on Darwinism, in other words he's not talking about Darwinism anymore he's arguing that survival of fittest has now become the survival of the wisest (Scientists). What that means is: The Elite embodied in, reincarnated in the scientific class, now functions as the arbiters of 'Mother Nature' (God), and as a result they're going to have to put into place the structures and systems to decide who lives and who dies. So this is what this book is about . Another layer of a Darwinian cult of mass depopulation.

He begins the book by saying, 'the big problem that we face is too many people. Man will have to regulate and take the place of 'Mother Nature' because 'Mother Nature', he argues, has natural function of keeping balance and regulating population through disease and death, which he says are "Good". He says Man has to step up and take on that role and do the exact same thing. So here is your psychopath Darwinian cult leader arguing not only that; Salk says, Man is X-Men. You're all just bunch of mutants and because you're mutants, there's nothing wrong with the scientific establishment mutating you secretly with RNA viruses... Yes he says that in the chapter 7 named 'Mutations'; hoping to do all kinds of things that produce advantageous and disadvantageous effects, by mutating and testing on people through their RNA/DNA, and eggs of reproduction. Human female egg can be experimented on in his opinion and introduction of mass diseases, and cancers is necessary.

All of this is just another function of "Evolution". So, a bunch of scientific cult leaders kill us all and murdering babies is another "Naturalistic Process" . Because death, disease, and destruction are "Good" in his view because they're so called part of the dialectical evolutionary process, they produce a new stage of man. In short, in order to get to the next evolutionary stage you have to commit mass murder.

And who stands in the way of this evolutionary leap? Traditionalists! Yes, Traditionalists must die because they're anti-evolutionary and they don't accept the evolution of morals out of right and wrong into anything. Morals are part of an evolutionary process, if you do not accept this as true, which makes you regressive and you're moving back toward so called Protozoa stage, you need to die, and elite will decide who lives and who dies, because "we are God men and we as God men will kill you. "(page 70)

Then he discusses what it means to be pro-life? He says, it means to support evolution, and killing most of the population. That's truly pro-life according to him because that's the only way species will go into the future and through Transhumanism become immortal! But if you're 'Pro-life' in colloquial sense and you want to have children and oppose Euthanasia then you're actually Pro-death because you're not evolving.

Then he goes into bunch of speculations about Metaphysics, which is by the way the most extreme inquisition imaginable. I thought as a scientist one must be anti-dogmatic but no the Darwinian death cult duped so called scientists thinking that the scientific class was actually here to free them from the dogmas of superstition and religion. But the new cult of 'The Wisest' is most dogmatic ever and is going to kill that doesn't adhere to it.
Salk says 'if you're dogmatic, you're egomaniac...you're lesser evolved, religious superstitious,and moral objectivist, you need to die' but the ideas in this book are the most dogmatic thing ever! He advocates re-education camps to educate people about the fruits of death like Red Dawn type stuff it would not be communists it would be Red Dawn with Mad Scientists in your face. It would be Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye having you strapped down on the table and messing with you.

That's what Salk and likes of him dream of. He's hoping for all kinds of human experiments in this book as a father of inoculations on a mass scale. I wonder what means he might use to get what he and likes of him wants? Maybe inoculations? He mentions that inoculations might be a means, by which they could engineer evolution or devolution... by changing the genetic code and running experiments... that's what he says on page 53. All is flux, however Salk's position is not flux, because everything is changing and with the passage of time people may be proved wrong but this can never happen to Mr Salk's position!
His argument is self refuting at the most basic level. He contradicts himself in this book but it's okay because these kind of people are funded by Carnegie Mellon and Rockefeller establishment etc with a threat that if you don't join that scientific cult you're not going into future.

I want you to see the point of that
1) why would you trust mass vaccinations?
2) why would you trust the whole idea of mass vaccination from a guy who writes that book "The Survival of the Wisest" by killing everybody.

Who made a man a God?

They claim it by just a man a human a baby and behaviour.

It's known human only behaviour making choices as a human that kill us all.

To be created you are the highest greatest in the species type.

Even the evolutionist would agree.

So therefore a human says the mutated species owned a cause. I choose to talk about it.

As you only make any claim by being human conscious and human looking observing. So you aren't in any past yourself. But as you keep taking your mind Into false thinking you begin to believe it yourself.

By choice only.

The past life human healthy was mutated. In the reactive moment. Then it stopped. When it was inherited. Biology has to be present to be physically changed by body.

It's human theist science that discusses non present reactions now present to cause a new one.

So two testimonials said information is similar but the references were very different.

You then say to Mr egotist brother a baby born present is only by human sex. Isn't any human you look at created formed now?

Yes.

So they were created from pre damaged pre existing damaged DNA?

Is that part DNA?

No. As sex now is as a beings place is now the type of biological life I look at now. Legal. So it's not past.

It's not past it's not future it's a new reaction. If you must compare human sex as a reaction as the lying man thinker we despise.

Science today said I changed.my science model machine and buildings. Proven I did in the past.

Today he's done the same. Different science results by machine types he chooses.

Then he tries to convince himself he's doing the same as the past.

Reactions occur then stop.

So he's lying.

My spiritual aware brother told me about his lying brothers.

If a new idea emerges you newly experiment. And you know you change anything by the choice you make now. Present owns all past positions you yet haven't changed.

Yet the past owned more presence is what you ignore.

What lying in science means.

Past in formation is at the moment now.

 

[wellwisher]

Before we start, I think I need to pull out the Steven Novella quote:

What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?

IOW, science is just about trying to answer empirical questions in a rigorous way. It's not applicable to all questions because:

- not all questions deal with empirical knowledge, and
- we don't have good enough information on some empirical questions for our best answers to have enough rigor to be called "science."

Are you focusing on one of these objections (or both) to using science across the board?

... or are you just arguing for less rigor when answering the things that are within the purview of science?

The wild card is science does not have its own resources. It is dependent on government, industry and private donations for its resources. If you cannot get funding for your science, it will not occur. Very few scientists will take out a personal loan to do their science. If you do get funding there can be some strings attached. This is life. You can do good science for a tobacco company but you will never be allowed to publish anything that will harm the company, at least on their dime. You would need to get funding from someone with a different agenda. Both can run the same studies, but it will not end the same way for both. Like any job, it is not a democracy.

In terms of COVID, Fauci, who was the head of the CDC, had a lot of Government funding channeled through his department, due to the pandemic and the lead role of Government. If you you wanted to ride that gravity train, there was a company line to tow, in terms of what science would be allowed. The rest would get no funding so no data could be generated. This makes it look bad for affect. If you wanted funding you needed to reinforce this censorship, by calling anything not on the gravy train, dangerous.

Global warming and Climate change work the same way. Science is supposed be open minded and objective and willing to look under every reasonable stone. Once science takes sides; forms a consensus, you know the donors of that science are defining a funding quid pro quo. Good scientist were called deniers because they would not toe the line, but tried to be consistent with another valid avenue of science. There was a scientist who was considered one of the world experts in atmospheric water, which is how most of weather and climate is mediated. He had a different theory for climate change. But since this science was not with the program, and he would not cave, he became a target of political activism.

The Twitter files are showing us how the DNC, many Government Intel Agencies; FBI, CIA, DOD, and Legacy and Social Media were censoring COVID science like they did climate change, with both going along with the more Liberal side of the political science spectrum. The Left need a one-sided ambiance for draconian COVID measures that would make it easier to alter state election laws in 2020. Marshall Law allows drastic changes in the guise of public safety. Science should be free to investigate all avenues and not be restricted based on towing a line.

My solution is funding to science should be detached from political quid pro quo. One litmus test for the current meddling is anything called a consensus of science. Consensus is based on opinion, which is not how science works. Science is supposed to be based on evidence that nobody can refute. Politics is based on personal opinion with or without enough evidence. Prestige and opinion is not how science is supposed to work, but is more connected with the providers of funding calling the winners and losers.

 

[metis]

The wild card is science does not have its own resources

False. For example, I have a granddaughter with a graduate degree in chemisty and quantum mathematics, and her parents paid her way through this although she did get some scholarship help as well because of her grades [she 4 pointed her undergrad & graduate studies-- she's a helluva lot smarter than her nono]. Thus, what you write above is nothing more than a stereotype.

In terms of COVID, Fauci, who was the head of the CDC, had a lot of Government funding channeled through his department, due to the pandemic and the lead role of Government.

The CDC has a well-respected international reputation, and Fauci has worked for both Pub and Dem presidents. He's not perfect and has stated as such that he's not, as being a scientist involves being open to new evidence.

Global warming and Climate change work the same way. Science is supposed be open minded and objective and willing to look under every reasonable stone.

It is open minded on this but so many on the right certainly ain't. I don't go to Router Rooter to get a root canal, so I do believe it's far better to go with the science versus the politicians on matters like this.

The Twitter files are showing us how the DNC, many Government Intel Agencies; FBI, CIA, DOD, and Legacy and Social Media were censoring COVID science like they did climate change, with both going along with the more Liberal side of the political science spectrum.

And I'm supposed to rely on Twitter for accurate and unbiased information?

My solution is funding to science should be detached from political quid pro quo.

That would work fine if you don't mind slipping backwards. For just one example, how about our research investments for the military?

 

[rational experiences]

Our fathers memories was never Jesus and he was a first human bio father life.

Taught me.

He said God the man was actually men on origin earths natural history as first scientist the machines designer.

We had come out of the spirit eternal.

O earth once a non spinning one of crystal faced planet. Sitting inside an immaculate non burning heavens. Space law. Gods O the bodies.

O God was heated inside and hence kept erupting.

O suns larger masses exploded out from their body. Space pressure then formed O sun planetoids. Proving space is empty and the pressure to gain of O form. Is law.

As earths moon was stopped from colliding with earth. A planetoid from sun. Earth never blew up in the suns attack. Unlike other planets now scattered. O gods destroyed.

On fire as the suns mass ejected and less in mass as bodies projected they passed into earths mass forming earths tunnel system. Set alight heavens gases.

Space law pressure is infinite emptiness stopped the suns attack. Moons are the proof.

God the first theist man knew for his life to return into the eternal body the earth's atmosphere needed to return to non alight. Just cold clear. As only suns light attack forced us out of the eternal body.

Less density is no life.

Theists today know space law isn't any infinite resource as a sun still in position a reaction hasn't ended the reaction yet. When it does its ended.

Gods position is taught. O held mass.

| Earths heavens by space pressures is a filled up space. Around earth no Empty space. Put earth in contact with the eternal.

| Heavens against | eternal. Side by side as theist status. To explain a theme. Gas mass is by the side of the eternal.

No contact. The God bodies burnt O had been separated.

The eternal body is real.

| Heavens attacked by sun put in mass density.

|| So side by side was not touching on presence the bodies by type then changed.

| Gas mass clear pushed upon by sun mass from above then | >>>>| pushed sideways into the eternal. Bulged.

||>>>>> I onto the eternal body so it forced it to unnaturally move inside itself. Spirit resided as the creator in the eternal. Had caused change to its own body.

Density stretched back up in heavens as earths sun attack was leaving. By voiding space vacuum.

|<<<|<<<Spirit eternal was released forced out to cross over. At ground level in highest held gas mass to water density. Closest position to the eternal.

How spirit came out of the eternal and crossed into the heavens. Entering the water body the eternal body changed by vibration. First life of man a God typified by being eternal.

Wasn't father wasn't mother. Not animals. God the man stuck with nature garden body. Instant.

It couldn't all return back into eternal. ..so first man eternal human was trapped on earth with the garden nature. Not grounded.

The exact reason why a group of men could not go back yet knew about the eternal. History human memory knew it could and did return into eternal naturally.

Why we know we aren't the origin God O mass.
Why we know we aren't the first experience God the man scientist who took natural and conjured evil.

Against humans still in the eternal body.

How and why life came from spirit.

God the man was the first scientist who built the machine to alter the concept time...being light.

Believe it or not. I care less. It's how spirit explained why we lived on earth.

So God the man scientist gained the alter effect of no light. Carbon void vacuum removal of light and then heat as clear expansion. It's how God the man entered into his owned man scientists first memory.

Heavens was now carbon water encoded and now image voice of man recorded. True natural history. God man.

What state the origin heavens owned as it cooled stretching into vacuum void is clear only.

So science gets by machine in a fully aware taught memory....he knew the alter effect of a non burning clear gas heavens. Is heat clear expansion first in a claim I want to invent clear as a controlled machines interaction.

He caused the origin clear yet alter effect only hot clear expansion.

God the man hence is life's destroyer so we taught ourselves as gods victims.

Now humans were forced back out of eternal by the first science man. Earths density returned in voiding vacuum. How mother father animals came out as not God the first man of science.

Therefore all life in a world communal sun mass star fall destruction God the man scientist burnt to death. Today are heard screaming in recorded history. We were actually recorded going to mans science caused hell in an unknown quanta as a heavens mass event.

As lightning today is a going away small event. Once it was worldwide as an event.

In a God heavens origin cause you wouldn't name it a lightning strike. You couldn't quantify it as a man's controlled nuclear blast either.

It's indescribable.

It's why science warned science don't ever try to give God a named thesis as a reaction in our heavens mass as you cannot quantify it as a man.

You only idealise small controlled conditions. Evil enough itself.

The actual warning to all men...since when were you God O in space? Mass.

Therefore science is machine man God as the origins of human science the destroyer of life on earth. Who did encode AI himself.

Why he says I can control AI his machine communication causes.

We did come from spirit. It isn't an irrational thought.

In fact a man theist would say as I removed heavens density by thinning expanding heavens gases myself as God man. Density heavens thinned expanded only allowed a giant nature to re emerge.

As in thought memory I would claim animals and humans came out as non selves now a dinosaur spirits. That could not conform to animals and humans in a colder mass density as before heavens.

Hence when ice finally swapped it's place held on asteroid stars to planet earths body...frozen mass ice law became like crystal. Earths first law of a planet in space.

Animals small and humans spirit returned and came back out of the eternal spirit once again. In colder dense atmosphere.

As sex is the propogation law on earth.

So if you believe our family is spiritual don't let scientism convince you otherwise.

As my experience proved that a rational research human study without personal self gain is true.

I can tell my story.
My brother a scientist first only tells a story also.

His belief is that a scientist created creation as a man's human story. You'd have to ask what status history would motivate his belief.

Were you in fact in the eternal spirit yourself brother? As the only type of conscious awareness that would claim it knew everything created.