• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Chicken or the Egg- Which Evolved First?

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
Just a fun mental experiment to test your theories of evolution or Intelligent Design on.

Please do not go google someone else's explanation and post it.

Please explain how you came to your conclusion.

It was not as if a dinosaur lays an egg and a chicken hatched from it. There is no clear line of demarcation. It is a gradual process.

Edit: In other words, there were eggs being laid before there were any birds at all, let alone chickens.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Just a fun mental experiment to test your theories of evolution or Intelligent Design on.

Please do not go google someone else's explanation and post it.

Please explain how you came to your conclusion.
The egg obviously, as the egg contained the first chicken embroyo inside it. The drawing of the line between an ancestral and descendant species is arbitrary, but wherever you draw it, the embroyo in the egg is continuous with the descendant species and hence its the first chicken egg being laid by the non-chicken mom.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Please explain how you came to your conclusion.
Thinking, not through some scripture. The progeny is different from its parents, even if every slightly, which develops into a slightly different individual. Its own progeny will change further but will carry the difference. That is how evolution progresses (or sometimes digresses). Therefore, egg first.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Just a fun mental experiment to test your theories of evolution or Intelligent Design on.

Please do not go google someone else's explanation and post it.

Please explain how you came to your conclusion.

While there's an egg then there's a chicken, design is the only logic option.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
The egg came first. It would be a trickier question if you said 'which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg.'
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
The egg still needs someone to lay it. Even the chicken egg.

Edit: Let me put it another way--there was never an instance when something that was not a chicken gave birth to a chicken. Evolution is about species, not individuals.
 
Last edited:

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
Chickens are just a domesticated variety of a species that still exists in the wild--they are still classified as the same species because they can and will successfully interbreed if given the opportunity.
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
The egg still needs someone to lay it. Even the chicken egg.

Edit: Let me put it another way--there was never an instance when something that was not a chicken gave birth to a chicken. Evolution is about species, not individuals.
That's a very good point.

It's basically mixing categories. The egg is a generic concept. The chicken is a species, or group of individuals. The laying of an egg is the act of a single individual. And that's why it becomes a conundrum for some. When did a specific individual produce a generic thing that is also specific for the whole group of individuals? Well, it's a matter of how we categorize things rather than when something like this happened. It happens all the time, but it's our way of trying to fix a time, place, individual, for the generic that's causing the problem.
 

Acim

Revelation all the time
The egg came first. It would be a trickier question if you said 'which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg.'

The trickier question is how I understand the inquiry. How I thought everyone, over the age of 6, understood the question.

My take is: how could it possibly matter to us now? But also, I reserve the right to be fascinated by ancient tales that seek to explain the trickier question: which came first, entities that lay* eggs, or eggs that produce entities?
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
The egg came first. It would be a trickier question if you said 'which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg.'
Not much trickier. The answer would still be the chicken egg. The first chicken egg came from a bird that was very very much like a chicken, but not a chicken.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
You are attempting to present scientific knowledge as if it lacked any falseability whatsoever.

It's the truth, we're dealing with a hypothesis and not facts,
if it's facts then we don't need to discuss it because we can never falsify a fact.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
It's the truth, we're dealing with a hypothesis and not facts,

Not at all. There is a huge difference between a hypothesis and a scientific theory.

Scientific knowledge is tested, falseable, passible of improvement. It is very much the most reliable that humanity can hope to achieve.

if it's facts then we don't need to discuss it because we can never falsify a fact.

It is indeed sadly pointless and wasteful to discuss "whether" there was intelligent design.
 

Midnight Rain

Well-Known Member
Just a fun mental experiment to test your theories of evolution or Intelligent Design on.

Please do not go google someone else's explanation and post it.

Please explain how you came to your conclusion.
Eggs are used by far more species than just chickens. As we know that traits are inheritable it would mean that the ancestors of chickens had eggs. Therefore the egg did come before the chicken.

However the question is fundamentally flawed when you realize that the egg is the chicken. Its like asking what came first, the child or the adult? Almost all species of complex multi-cellular life has life stages wherein it has some equivalent to infancy to geriatric stages. This particular riddle, if we want to call it that, is talking specifically about the trait of chickens that they lay eggs.
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
However the question is fundamentally flawed when you realize that the egg is the chicken. Its like asking what came first, the child or the adult? Almost all species of complex multi-cellular life has life stages wherein it has some equivalent to infancy to geriatric stages. This particular riddle, if we want to call it that, is talking specifically about the trait of chickens that they lay eggs.
That's very good! I like "the egg is the chicken.":thumbsup:
 
Top