Blentyn chan Celi
New guy
Is it better to have a choice to love God, or no choice but to love God? Why or why not?
If you dont have a choice, its not love.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is it better to have a choice to love God, or no choice but to love God? Why or why not?
See, and I happen to think that if we love we have no choice about that. Loving describes what we are in that instance, a particular type of relationship with the object of affection.
Can we choose not to be in relation with another? To say we can is to say we can arbitrarily pull ourselves out of that relation to that thing. That doesn't describe any love I know.
Do you? Do you say, "Well, this jump looks good, let's be in love then, shall we?" *snap*But first you decide to jump.
When I look at your post you seem to be right. I hesitate to say that you are because the implication of your being right is that we then have no free will at all, just the illusion.Do you? Do you say, "Well, this jump looks good, let's be in love then, shall we?" *snap*
Or do you rather suddenly find yourself in love when you realise that you already are? That's more like how it works for me.
One way we choose to love God is to obey His commandments:
Would you say the illusion of free will is the same as free will?
doppelgänger;1050439 said:Of course. Both are constructs. Whether we have free will or not, from our perspective we can't help but appear to ourselves as making choices, even if the "choice" we make is completely determined by biology and memory. Put another way, not having free will would look from the individual's perspective the same as having free will.
I agree with her, too. Love grabs you. You don't grab love. Love always comes to us from outside ourselves. We love God because God first loved us. We cannot choose to be loved. The choice to be made is, how shall we honor that love? That's our free will -- to accept or reject having been loved.When I look at your post you seem to be right. I hesitate to say that you are because the implication of your being right is that we then have no free will at all, just the illusion.
But then
Would you say the illusion of free will is the same as free will?
I would say, as I have in the past, "Illusions exist."Would you say the illusion of free will is the same as free will?
Leonard Cohen said something similar in one of his songs:Love grabs you. You don't grab love.
. . . as further illusions . . .I would say, as I have in the past, "Illusions exist."
I'm going to have to sit down with a bag of something herbal to think about that.:cigar:doppelgänger;1050497 said:. . . as further illusions . . .
I do hope it's oregano...I'm going to have to sit down with a bag of something herbal to think about that.:cigar:
Re free will, it is only an illusion when you realise the illusion --that is, you make the illusion real through recognition (reconstructing) of what you thought was one thing as another thing. What stands in contrast to that is participation in the "illusion," wherein it cannot be considered an illusion. That's where free will is real.I'm going to have to sit down with a bag of something herbal to think about that.:cigar:
Reality to us is a series of images.