The circular reasoning of Evolution and billions of years believers.

[McBell]

Circular score of your post 100%

Your demonstrated failures at math render this opinion of your worthless.

Biblical prophecies fulfilled: dozens

Since you do not even know what version of the Bible you use, this Bible claim of yours is also worthless.

Where did the orderly and fine-tuned laws of nature come from?

What "orderly and fine-tuned" laws?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

That is a good question coming from someone who continues to post amongst those they claim can not possibly understand because they have not been possessed by a spirit. Why does it matter to you so much?

Where did all energy come from?

Rdbull

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

The controns multiplied.

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

midi-chlorians


Edit Note:
I had to change nontrons to controns because, well, as everyone knows, nothing times nothing is just a lot of nothing,

 

[ratiocinator]

Circular score of your post 100%

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Circular score of your post 100%

You don't seem to understand what circular reasoning is.

Biblical prophecies fulfilled: dozens

My prophecies fullfilled: 100%


Have you managed to find a single scientific paper already to cite, quote and explain how it uses circular reasoning?
No, right?

Off course not.
I predicted you would not, and my predictions have a 100% success rate.

You confirm the perfect success rate of my predictions with every post you make that doesn't include such a citation + quote + explanation.


Maybe I should start my own religion. I don't actually know of any prophet that achieves a perfect score on predictive capabilities.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You .......

Where did it come into being?
In clay or mud? What protected it from UV rays? What was the composition of the atmosphere at that time?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Where did it come into being?
In clay or mud? What protected it from UV rays? What was the composition of the atmosphere at that time?

You are just piling on the evidence in support of my impeccable perfect track record of predictive capabilities.

Let's continue.

I predict your next reply will NOT include a citation of a science paper, quoting and explanation of how it uses circular reasoning.

Go ahead.
Confirm my perfect score of prediction.

 

[Revoltingest]

Were you expecting a more entertaining clown?

Hoping.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well I have studied it for over 20 years and obsessively so.

You have probably been reading lying sources about evolution. Your understanding of evolution and other sciences is in the elementary school level at best.

 

[Alien826]

Maybe I should start my own religion. I don't actually know of any prophet that achieves a perfect score on predictive capabilities.

Not referring to your humorous prophesy, but I'm reminded of something said by Donald Soper* years ago. "The most important thing about prophesy is to have plenty of it". He meant of course that if you have lots of prophesies to choose from it's not difficult to find some kind of fit with whatever event you are considering.

* (Lord) Donald Soper was an English Methodist minister that who was given a life peerage for his work among the poor in the East End of London before WW2. That's a huge honor in the UK. He would talk on a "soap box" near the Tower of London, which is where I heard him say that.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You have probably been reading lying sources about evolution. Your understanding of evolution and other sciences is in the elementary school level at best.

All evolutionists and billions of years sources are false because they have been deceived in this area of knowledge.

 

[Subduction Zone]

All evolutionists and billions of years sources are false because they have been deceived in this area of knowledge.

If that is true then it should be no problem for you to prove it.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

If that is true then it should be no problem for you to prove it.

I already did. Please keep up.

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What was the energy source for these reactions?
Where there any enzymes in it? Which ones? Certain required reactions need enzymes as catalysts. If not, the reaction may take a vast number of years. Surely the primitive thing could not last more than a minute much less than many years.
How did it survive? Where did the protective layer come from? What was the protected layer? How did that part get reproduced?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I already did. Please keep up.

No, that is a falsehood. You only used failed arguments. I will remind you that you already tacitly admitted that you were wrong about your induction argument. I made your error clear to you and you ran away. That is the same as admitting that you were wrong in a debate.

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What was the energy source for these reactions?
Where there any enzymes in it? Which ones? Certain required reactions need enzymes as catalysts. If not, the reaction may take a vast number of years. Surely the primitive thing could not last more than a minute much less than many years.
How did it survive? Where did the protective layer come from? What was the protected layer? How did that part get reproduced?

And moving the goalposts is another way that a person admits that he was wrong. All you need to do is to openly admit that you were wrong about evolution and I will gladly answer those questions for you seriously.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, that is a falsehood. You only used failed arguments. I will remind you that you already tacitly admitted that you were wrong about your induction argument. I made your error clear to you and you ran away. That is the same as admitting that you were wrong in a debate.

And moving the goalposts is another way that a person admits that he was wrong. All you need to do is to openly admit that you were wrong about evolution and I will gladly answer those questions for you seriously.

You are just going around in a circle,

What existed before the Big Bang?

 

[Subduction Zone]

You are just going around in a circle,

That is only because you are using circular reasoning and are repeating your errors.

What existed before the Big Bang?

J.C. Penny.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

That is only because you are using circular reasoning and are repeating your errors.

J.C. Penny.

The nonsense of the circular reasoning of evolution and billions of years on display. No answer to the origin of anything.

Here is the circular reasoning of evolution .

if A , then A

 

[Subduction Zone]

The nonsense of the circular reasoning of evolution and billions of years on display. No answer to the origin of anything.

Here is the circular reasoning of evolution .

if A , then A

But you have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no clue what circular reasoning is. If you did you would be openly lying. I guess ignorance does come in handy at times.

 

[ratiocinator]

The nonsense of the circular reasoning of evolution and billions of years on display.

Where? You still haven't given even one example.

No answer to the origin of anything.

Neither have you. How come your god exists, rather than another one, no gods, or many?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

The nonsense of the circular reasoning of evolution and billions of years on display. No answer to the origin of anything.

Here is the circular reasoning of evolution .

if A , then A

Still no citation, quoting of the paper and explanation of how it's circular, ha?

My impeccable predictive capabilites remain on a perfect score it seems.

 

[John53]

Still no citation, quoting of the paper and explanation of how it's circular, ha?

My impeccable predictive capabilites remain on a perfect score it seems.

It's a 100% success rate so far, you should have a go at the lotto!

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Still no citation, quoting of the paper and explanation of how it's circular, ha?

My impeccable predictive capabilites remain on a perfect score it seems.

What a joke that evolution. Who could actually believe it?
But that is what circular reasoning leads to, delusion.

the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.

The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.

The Hubble Tension Is Extremely Real—and Extremely Frustrating

We still don’t know why different measurements of the rate of the universe’s expansion don’t match. But at least we know we can’t blame the Hubble telescope.

www.yahoo.com

Carbon-14 dating dinosaur bones

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains

Remembering Mount St. Helens 35 Years Later

The volcano’s main 1980 eruption filled in an entire valley with hundreds of feet of sediment. Another smaller eruption event deposited more material on top of that, and then a third deposition occurred in 1982. Later, a catastrophic flood of snowmelt water and muddy debris tore a gash through...

www.icr.org