• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The concept of God can be understood as the mathematical limit of our knowledge.

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
If you get to know all about A, that includes that you are the one who knows about A.
You first have to provide evidence that there is a "you."

Some advice: If you stop trying to shove your "omniscient being" down my throat, I can stop pointing out your errors.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
When JC returns the Science will be proven. All Axioms, all conjectures, will be proven, if only where is proof that JC knows all. So, the proof of Science I have.
Okay.

Let me know when he returns, and will pick this discussion back up then.

Thanks.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Let me know when he returns, and will pick this discussion back up then.
It is about me:

He was despised and rejected by mankind,
a man of suffering, and familiar with pain.
Like one from whom people hide their faces
he was despised, and we held him in low esteem. Isaiah 53.

The JC was very popular and healthy. So, it is about me. The man, who ha proven Science. The man, whose home number is 42:

 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Proof starts. An omniscient being knows that He exists. Proof ends.

COMMENTARY:

Let us consider the possibility that an omniscient being exists.
Then, He must know that He exists.
This means that His existence is part of knowledge.
Therefore, He exists.
Let's apply your exact "logical" reasoning to a similar premise.

Let us consider the possibility that I am that omniscient being.
Then, I must know that I exist.
This means that my existence is part of knowledge.
Therefore, I exist....as an omniscient being.


Either we've just seen reductio ad absurdum, or.....
I'm your go to sage for any counseling needed.

For my next trick, I'll prove my omnipotence.
So mind your manners, people. I'm watching.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
If you get to know all about A, that includes that you are the one who knows about A.
Who told you that A exists, and why believe them when you can't verifiy they are telling the truth?

The quest for truth should come along with not being gullible, and not believing in ideas that lack evidence.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I have brain of a scientist.
I'm not convinced. This thread alone indicates you can't formulate a coherent argument with evidence.

And I don't see scientists threatening critics with JC coming back and forcing us to believe some idea they can't show us is true.

And I don't see scientists suggesting others pray to get information they themselves can't provide.
Here is my proof of Riemann hypothesis: Importance of Riemann hypothesis
So, I am making my research. For, example: we live in eternity.
You're citing your own thread, and it looks much like a cut and paste topic.
 
Top