• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Da Vinci Code: Christ's sexual life

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
When Dan Brown wrote The Da Vinci Code, well...I was not particularly Christian at that time.
But I remember that I believed in everything that was written in the book; that is, Jesus and Magdalene were lovers, and conceived a daughter.

I thought that this wouldn't have diminished Christ's divinity- But as a Catholic, I believe that Christ is made of a double nature: a nature which is both divine and human and one does not exclude the other.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I suppose it doesn't matter that the story was fiction.

Of course it was. But as a matter of fact, the research on the Holy Graal, the history of the French monarchy and the Merovingian dynasty can induce people to doubt the fact that Jesus was a chaste man.
Besides, there is a Gospel of Magdalene too.
 
Last edited:

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Of course it was. But as a matter of fact, the research on the Holy Graal, the history of the French monarchy and the Merovingian dynasty can induce people to doubt on the fact that Jesus was a chaste man.
Besides, there is a Gospel of Magdalene too.

I think you can believe what you want though. I don't think there is enough evidence to prove beyond any doubt one way or another.

Speculation is fine for entertainment but I don't think anyone is going to be able to prove anything.

Sorry, I've just really have come to doubt anything I can't examine for myself.

For me it doesn't bother me if Jesus wasn't chaste. It just seems stupid for people to insist on facts they couldn't possibly prove.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
When Dan Brown wrote The Da Vinci Code, well...I was not particularly Christian at that time.
But I remember that I believed in everything that was written in the book; that is, Jesus and Magdalene were lovers, and conceived a daughter.

I thought that this wouldn't have diminished Christ's divinity- But as a Catholic, I believe that Christ is made of a double nature: a nature which is both divine and human and one does not exclude the other.

I cannot see any reason to doubt that Jesus had 'known' women. It's quite possible that he loved Magdalene. After all, he did kiss her on the lips and held her more close than any others. And she did dare to be present at his death with Salome.

Yes........ Jesus may well have loved Magdalene. It's only Paul's messed up mind that caused one of the first big Christian hypocrisies, imo.
 

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
If Jesus was with Mary he couldn't be free of sin, that's the problem that arises. It's no problem once you realize Jesus was just another guy with interesting ideas.
 

WhatGod

Member
When Dan Brown wrote The Da Vinci Code, well...I was not particularly Christian at that time.
But I remember that I believed in everything that was written in the book; that is, Jesus and Magdalene were lovers, and conceived a daughter.

As a Jewish rabbi at the time, it would have been unthinkable for him not to have been married with kids if possible. Kids and marriage were how you knew god liked you.

Of course if he was actually an Essene then he might of been celibate.

Of course there is a good case to be made that he was bi since the bible speaks of Mary and Lazarus getting the "special" sacrament.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I cannot see any reason to doubt that Jesus had 'known' women. It's quite possible that he loved Magdalene. After all, he did kiss her on the lips and held her more close than any others. And she did dare to be present at his death with Salome.

Yes........ Jesus may well have loved Magdalene. It's only Paul's messed up mind that caused one of the first big Christian hypocrisies, imo.

precisely...bravo. That's exactly what I claim.
It is sick to see wickedness in a normal love affair. Jesus was a man and he may have fallen in love with Magdalene, after that she stopped being a prostitute.

Paul's moral statements are anti-Christian. I believe Paul was a great theologian, but he was certainly not infallible.
Let's not forget that Paul said that women don't have the right to speak in assemblies.
 

Amechania

Daimona of the Helpless
Okay I'm Jesus and I believe I have a date with destiny. But I'.lll just disregard everything I've taught to get my rocks off.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Okay I'm Jesus and I believe I have a date with destiny. But I'.lll just disregard everything I've taught to get my rocks off.

Ummm..... don't think so..... :)
For a Galilean Jew to reach 30 years and not to have been married, something somewhere would have been significantly different about him.

I don't think that there was anything anywhere different about Jesus, so I expect that he would have been married, and maybe widowered. I think that Magdalene was his love, his partner and maybe even his spouse.

Destiny? Jesus took up John the Baptists date with destiny..... after an intense internal struggle. His mission was (mainly) to speak out for the working people of Galilee. Paul's 'Christianity' had nothing to do with Jesus...... Paul seems to have had serious problems about sex. His ideas were a bit weird.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Okay I'm Jesus and I believe I have a date with destiny. But I'.lll just disregard everything I've taught to get my rocks off.

Did Jesus teach that having sex with the person you love, is a sin?

Jesus' parables are about Economics and Society.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
For me it doesn't bother me if Jesus wasn't chaste. It just seems stupid for people to insist on facts they couldn't possibly prove.

precisely. Jesus may have been a frigid asexual man, who knows?
what I am underlining is that his sexual life is absolutely irrelevant. Because Christianity is about freedom; and you can decide whether to be single or to be in a relationship.
Because both choices respect Christ's teachings.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
You may not think fornication is a sin, but the ancient Jews did.

well..the hypothesis we are dealing with, is that Jesus and Magdalene fell in love with each other, and then became a stable monogamous couple.
and they probably used to have sex. I don't think it is weird at all.
premarital sex was against the Mosaic law, of course.
 

WhatGod

Member
well..the hypothesis we are dealing with, is that Jesus and Magdalene fell in love with each other, and then became a stable monogamous couple.
and they probably used to have sex. I don't think it is weird at all.
premarital sex was against the Mosaic law, of course.

Not once betrothed.
 

WhatGod

Member
If Jesus was with Mary he couldn't be free of sin....

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Jesus

By definition, as god, Jesus can't sin. Just like having himself tortured to death in a bloody murder suicide of himself isn't a sin. Or how murdering every person on the planet except an incestuous drunk and his family isn't a sin, for god.

that's the problem that arises. It's no problem once you realize Jesus was just another guy with interesting ideas.

There really is no reason to think there was ever any particular guy "Jesus." I can't think of one original idea in the bible.
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
Hay85 said:
But I remember that I believed in everything that was written in the book; that is, Jesus and Magdalene were lovers, and conceived a daughter.

A case of itching ears perhaps?
 
Top