• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The dark side of gender change for minors. Chloe Cole sues doctors and blames Biden.

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
So, placebo effect only works in the placebo group! Good to know.

Either that or everyone's perceived reality is a result of our beliefs.
Why don't you just admit you don't know these things?
Placebo effects are about as real as the hallucinations and delusions experienced by those with schizophrenia. There is absolutely nothing there going on external to the mind it's happening in. Curses, for example, when they "work" is because of a placebo effect. Or how it's possible to make a kid "drunk" on punch.
Nothing is going on. Nothing is happening. It's less real and more trick than the burn of a hot pepper (it's not really burning, but a chemical in the pepper tricks nerve endings into thinking they are burning). Placebos are 100% in the head and nothing actually really happening except what the person believes.
 

cladking

Well-Known Member
Remarkable.

It must be magic that turns placebo effect on and off. It must only work for sugar pills.

Consciousness is "magic" as well. A brain having hallucinations is exactly the same as one that asleep, working, or pondering. Maybe you believe that hot peppers are a sort of placebo effect as well. Capsaicin is just a placebo that causes burning.

I believe your perspective is making it very difficult to understand these things.
 

Ella S.

Well-Known Member
So everyone here has an advanced degree in ethics and I have no right to an opinion in the face of so much expertise. I bet they didn't teach you this in Ethics 101.

The subject at hand is the efficacy of a particular medical treatment and various related scientific concepts. You have no expertise on any of them. I used your ignorance on the placebo effect as one example, which will continue to be addressed in this post.

I would imagine that you are not well-educated on ethics, either, if you oppose life-saving medical care. I can't think of any ethical philosophy that would support doing that, nor would I respect any attempt on your part to argue in favor of one.

It must be magic that turns placebo effect on and off. It must only work for sugar pills.

The placebo effect isn't turned on and off. It's an effect, not a state. You can be subject to more than one independent placebo effect at the same time.

It is also caused by neural activity and it is a reaction within the central nervous system regulating the body, not magic.

Consciousness is "magic" as well. A brain having hallucinations is exactly the same as one that asleep, working, or pondering.

No, it isn't. Each of these states are associated with completely different neural activity which we can measure using various kinds of brain scans.

Maybe you believe that hot peppers are a sort of placebo effect as well. Capsaicin is just a placebo that causes burning.

Capsaicin is not a placebo. Its spiciness is caused by the way its particular molecular structure interacts with nerve-endings, causing the chemical to stimulate the same nerves that a hot object would.

I do not really understand how you are getting the two mixed up or why you think anyone here would conflate the two.

I believe your perspective is making it very difficult to understand these things.

I don't see why you're having so much difficulty understanding these topics.

My advice for you to give up this discussion was genuine. I wasn't trying to be mocking or condescending. I bring it up here again because you've only dug your own hole further since my last reply.

ETA:

So, placebo effect only works in the placebo group! Good to know.

In an experiment, the placebo effect is used as a control group. This means that we measure the efficacy of other medications against the efficacy of a placebo.

When a medication is shown to be more effective than a placebo, then that shows that the medication itself isn't a placebo. If it was, it would only be as effective as a placebo.

Either that or everyone's perceived reality is a result of our beliefs.

My "perceived reality" is based on sensory input, not beliefs.
 
Last edited:

cladking

Well-Known Member
I would imagine that you are not well-educated on ethics, either, if you oppose life-saving medical care. I can't think of any ethical philosophy that would support doing that, nor would I respect any attempt on your part to argue in favor of one.

Are you even aware that there exist people in agony whom are being denied palliative care and are have problems like old age ands organ failure and desire to die. There are people in vegetative states who suck up vast resources that could be used by the living for better lives who are kept alive for profit. There are a few survivors of executions and are highly detrimental to society and would just be reexecuted anyway. Is a soldier morally bound to provide first aid to an enemy he just shot while under intense fire? I'm sure I could go on and on.

Why do you not see such things? Do you live in a black and white world where every decision can simply be found in the playbook of science?

The placebo effect isn't turned on and off. It's an effect, not a state.

And you believe this effect is magically turned on and off by a Practitioner of Science called a "Doctor"!!!

You can extrapolate the existence of things that might or might not be real but you can't extrapolate the existence of placebo effect which is clearly visible. Gravity is real and operates on all things at all times. All matter in the universe operates on all other matter at all times. Placebo effect is just as real and operates on all human consciousness at all times. Everything within the consciousness of all humans is at all times affected to a greater or lesser extent (within the definition of the term) by placebo effect. A person can get well by the laying on of hands, the touch of a doctor, or a belief in voodoo.

You want to consider the effect of one experiment at a time but in the REAL world where we all live every single experiment that has ever been performed applies simultaneously. I would add that all ancient science also applies but then you don't believe in ancient science or much of anything unsupported by Peers.

No, it isn't. Each of these states are associated with completely different neural activity which we can measure using various kinds of brain scans.

I bet you can't tell me what I'm thinking or why. I bet you can't tell me a single one of my beliefs. I bet you can't tell me how a bee's thinking is different than mine.

I wasn't trying to be mocking or condescending.

I take your posts as condescension. It is apparent you are not trying to parse my sentences as they are intended and then you are trying to straighten me out with the words of Peers. Why don't you tell me what you know instead of what you've read in books. Tell me how the books apply to what I am actually saying. If you can't explain theory to a four year old then you probably don't understand it yourself.

In an experiment, the placebo effect is used as a control group. This means that we measure the efficacy of other medications against the efficacy of a placebo.

When a medication is shown to be more effective than a placebo, then that shows that the medication itself isn't a placebo. If it was, it would only be as effective as a placebo.

I see. Doesn't this mean you have to tell the experimental group that they are getting real medication to try to control placebo effect? This might not work for obvious reasons so maybe this and all other statistics, computer modelling, and correlative studies are not really science at all. We put together complex molecules and then see what effect hey have on a population. This is very very little different than ancient people trying various herbs and preparation to see what if any effect they had or whether they are good for food or suddenly changed into a food through the theory of change in species. The biggest difference here is they knew each individual was different and sought to observe these differences and we do not. we just supply drugs to populations not individuals. And, yes, we test for placebo effect. Ancient people didn't experience placebo effect so had no need for further observation.

We are all mystical because this is the nature of homo omniscience, but mysticism in science is at best annoying and sometimes appalling.

I believe the mutilation of children is principally caused by mysticism. Obviously this is not true in every single instance but rather in some or many. I'm sure I don't know.
 

cladking

Well-Known Member
My "perceived reality" is based on sensory input, not beliefs.

This is what everyone believes. We are homo omniscience and that people each believe this is why all humans in all eras are unique to their time and place.

We believe we experience reality directly but the reality is we can experience only through what we have been taught which was acquired through language.

Or mebbe placebo effect doesn't apply to you!!!
 

cladking

Well-Known Member
I believe the mutilation of children is principally caused by mysticism.

I don't call it "mutilation" because it is harmful in every case. It is probably quite beneficial or even life saving in some or many cases. I call it mutilation because children are not competent or experienced enough to make choices that are irreversible. I should hardly be surprised if some of these children are virgins. This is especially evil because now days children are indoctrinated. They come out of school unable to read and write but all singing Kumbaya. As these people age their opinions and beliefs are likely to change much more than many previous generations. It seems only natural to leave as few other types of scars on them as possible
 

Ella S.

Well-Known Member
Are you even aware that there exist people in agony whom are being denied palliative care and are have problems like old age ands organ failure and desire to die. There are people in vegetative states who suck up vast resources that could be used by the living for better lives who are kept alive for profit. There are a few survivors of executions and are highly detrimental to society and would just be reexecuted anyway. Is a soldier morally bound to provide first aid to an enemy he just shot while under intense fire? I'm sure I could go on and on.

Why do you not see such things? Do you live in a black and white world where every decision can simply be found in the playbook of science?

Irrelevant to the topic.

And you believe this effect is magically turned on and off by a Practitioner of Science called a "Doctor"!!!

As I stated, the placebo effect is not magic, nor is it turned on or off. If you wish to make a counter-argument, you usually have to address the argument.

As it stands, this is an intellectually dishonest Straw Man, which seems to be your only debate strategy so far. It isn't working.

You can extrapolate the existence of things that might or might not be real but you can't extrapolate the existence of placebo effect which is clearly visible. Gravity is real and operates on all things at all times. All matter in the universe operates on all other matter at all times. Placebo effect is just as real and operates on all human consciousness at all times. Everything within the consciousness of all humans is at all times affected to a greater or lesser extent (within the definition of the term) by placebo effect. A person can get well by the laying on of hands, the touch of a doctor, or a belief in voodoo.

You want to consider the effect of one experiment at a time but in the REAL world where we all live every single experiment that has ever been performed applies simultaneously. I would add that all ancient science also applies but then you don't believe in ancient science or much of anything unsupported by Peers.

The placebo effect does not operate on the human consciousness at all times. I'm not sure where you heard that from.

I bet you can't tell me what I'm thinking or why. I bet you can't tell me a single one of my beliefs. I bet you can't tell me how a bee's thinking is different than mine.

Irrelevant, yet again. Your Gish Gallop smokescreen isn't going to work in a text-based forum.

I take your posts as condescension.

This one is.

It is apparent you are not trying to parse my sentences as they are intended and then you are trying to straighten me out with the words of Peers. Why don't you tell me what you know instead of what you've read in books. Tell me how the books apply to what I am actually saying. If you can't explain theory to a four year old then you probably don't understand it yourself.

I've met four year olds with a better understanding of these topics than you. You simply refuse to learn, which is apparent by your numerous Straw Men and your need to label everything you don't understand "magic."

I wouldn't take so much pride in not having read any books but I suppose you'd have to read a few books to realize why that's a backfiring insult.

I see. Doesn't this mean you have to tell the experimental group that they are getting real medication to try to control placebo effect? This might not work for obvious reasons so maybe this and all other statistics, computer modelling, and correlative studies are not really science at all. We put together complex molecules and then see what effect hey have on a population. This is very very little different than ancient people trying various herbs and preparation to see what if any effect they had or whether they are good for food or suddenly changed into a food through the theory of change in species. The biggest difference here is they knew each individual was different and sought to observe these differences and we do not. we just supply drugs to populations not individuals. And, yes, we test for placebo effect. Ancient people didn't experience placebo effect so had no need for further observation.

You would do better to study the effect than make wild assumptions about it.

We are all mystical because this is the nature of homo omniscience, but mysticism in science is at best annoying and sometimes appalling.

You have it backwards. When mysticism actually works it becomes science.

I believe the mutilation of children is principally caused by mysticism. Obviously this is not true in every single instance but rather in some or many. I'm sure I don't know.

I believe that position is not only ignorant but that you have demonstrated that it is formed from willful intellectual dishonesty on your part. You have the gall to lecture us about real science without understanding how a remedial medical study is performed.

It's pathetic.

This is what everyone believes. We are homo omniscience and that people each believe this is why all humans in all eras are unique to their time and place.

We believe we experience reality directly but the reality is we can experience only through what we have been taught which was acquired through language.

Or mebbe placebo effect doesn't apply to you!!!

I think it's telling that, along with rejecting book learning as a whole, you also have to reject that you can experience reality.

Well, you might be right about that one, but you're wrong that I share that issue.

I don't call it "mutilation" because it is harmful in every case. It is probably quite beneficial or even life saving in some or many cases. I call it mutilation because children are not competent or experienced enough to make choices that are irreversible. I should hardly be surprised if some of these children are virgins. This is especially evil because now days children are indoctrinated. They come out of school unable to read and write but all singing Kumbaya. As these people age their opinions and beliefs are likely to change much more than many previous generations. It seems only natural to leave as few other types of scars on them as possible

I think it's a shame that childhood indoctrination is so widespread these days. I came across this one user who thought the placebo effect was magic and that the life-saving surgeries performed by medical experts are actually mutilations performed by mystics.

People like that are beyond my help.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Capsaicin is not a placebo. Its spiciness is caused by the way its particular molecular structure interacts with nerve-endings, causing the chemical to stimulate the same nerves that a hot object would.

I do not really understand how you are getting the two mixed up or why you think anyone here would conflate the two.
I was trying to explain that a placebo has less going on than that. That has a physiological explanation to explain why it feels like it burns despite the fact nothing is actually burning.
The placebo is just some weird things going on in the head and exist only in the head it's happening in.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
This is especially evil because now days children are indoctrinated.
Not like in the past when they were all expected to be Christian and raised to be that way amd taught to repeat it even before they could understand it or even decide for themselves. That sort of indoctrination even still happens today.
 

Ella S.

Well-Known Member
I was trying to explain that a placebo has less going on than that. That has a physiological explanation to explain why it feels like it burns despite the fact nothing is actually burning.
The placebo is just some weird things going on in the head and exist only in the head it's happening in.

I wouldn't be so hard on yourself. I read your posts before responding. Your explanation was more than adequate.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
This is heartbreaking.
They just want cisgender people (the 97% of people) to undergo the Calvary of transition ...by brainwashing through LGBT propaganda in school.

 
Top