• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The decline of traditional religion in the West

firedragon

firedragon

Veteran Member
danieldemol said:
Whether or not they are seventh century or eighth century is what we are debating. It is not a given.
Click to expand...

I am sure you understand English. This sentence above is the answer to this statement of mine.

"And this guy is irrelevant to all the 7th century manuscripts I have given."

I can't understand how your statement is an answer to this. When I say "I have given" it does not mean "it is a given".

I have given you a few manuscripts dated to the 7th century. Address those first. I have given you specific manuscripts. Names. You have so far ignored it several times, and tried to make a sweeping statement about all of them as if they are all one single manuscript, and now made some weird and irrelevant statement about them.

Address the manuscripts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top