Right, we don't come from apes. We do have a common ancestor though. "The genetic codes of human beings and chimpanzees differe by less than 1 percent" David Mills in Atheist Universe.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Right, we don't come from apes. We do have a common ancestor though. "The genetic codes of human beings and chimpanzees differe by less than 1 percent" David Mills in Atheist Universe.
Right, we don't come from apes. We do have a common ancestor though. "The genetic codes of human beings and chimpanzees differe by less than 1 percent" David Mills in Atheist Universe.
So where did apes evolve from, Reptiles? I have heard we are apes, but that the great ape and man share a common ancestor that no one has found yet? Is that wrong?Actually we do. We have direct ancestors who, if they were alive today, would be classified as Apes.
Therefore we are Apes (Just not Great Apes), Birds are Dinosaurs, all Mammals are Reptiles, etc. etc.
Monophyletic Taxonomy doesn't make sense!
So where did apes evolve from, Reptiles? I have heard we are apes, but that the great ape and man share a common ancestor that no one has found yet? Is that wrong?
So where did apes evolve from, Reptiles? I have heard we are apes, but that the great ape and man share a common ancestor that no one has found yet? Is that wrong?
No, it is just that you do not understand Evolution, you seem to think (by the way you formulate yourself) that "some animal" got a baby and surprise it was a Human.. Is that right? If not, I apologize, many people do not understand Evolution, I mean people in Universities right now, they have a basic "hum hum" about it but really know nothing, you need to aim for Biology to get a proper education, You are not alone, nothing to feel ashamed about.
You should read Dawkins new book it is aimed for people who do not understand Evolution and, I am saying this as a "neutral" (Heavily Critize him on various issues) judge of Dawkins, He is A very good Teacher.
I can almost promise you you would get an excellent understand of Evolution if you read either one of his books or any specifically aimed to teach about Evolution, this link may help.
Thank you for the sites and suggestions. I have read quite a bit on ToE but am always looking to learn more. I am aware of what you were saying, I was just a bit confused by your one post and wanted clarification.No, it is just that you do not understand Evolution, you seem to think (by the way you formulate yourself) that "some animal" got a baby and surprise it was a Human.. Is that right? If not, I apologize, many people do not understand Evolution, I mean people in Universities right now, they have a basic "hum hum" about it but really know nothing, you need to aim for Biology to get a proper education, You are not alone, nothing to feel ashamed about.
You should read Dawkins new book it is aimed for people who do not understand Evolution and, I am saying this as a "neutral" (Heavily Critize him on various issues) judge of Dawkins, He is A very good Teacher.
I can almost promise you you would get an excellent understand of Evolution if you read either one of his books or any specifically aimed to teach about Evolution, this link may help.
Yes that gave me a visual. Thank you.
Yes, quite right, I do understand it, just not as much as I would like. However, I learn more every day.I could be off base but my experience talking with Challupa he does not dismiss the ToE. I think he understands it but was trying to understand the tree and where our ancestors fit. Although...I could be completely wrong in my assessment...
Thank you for the sites and suggestions. I have read quite a bit on ToE but am always looking to learn more. I am aware of what you were saying, I was just a bit confused by your one post and wanted clarification.
Just so you know, I am not a creationist so don't worry. I have read several of Dawkins books, Hitchens and am currently in the middle of David Mills "Atheist Universe". I find ToE fascinating and love to learn more. I learn lots here on RF because we are so lucky to have very knowledgeable people that post here. I have learned so much from many here.
Nothing I can think of right off. Usually the questions happen when someone posts something I have not heard of or have never had fully explained. Sometimes it's hard to ask questions, if you're not even aware they are there to ask. So I read and learn and that triggers questions for me. Don't worry, I will ask, as many here know, when I don't understand. No worries, no need to apologize. It's hard to know who believes what on here sometimes. For example, Footprints confuses me constantly. I never know what he believes.I am so sorry, I apologize.
Well, if there is any questions I would have no problem trying to help as well as others no doubt would pitch in if anything. you got anything specific on your mind? I usually use graphs because it gives a good representation, but remember, they are just a visual aid, nothing else.
i must say i am very impressed. not that i wasn't expecting it but the way he handles the question is just wonderful.
I present to you Richad Dawkings
[youtube]AB58ULPL54w[/youtube]
YouTube - Evolutionist Atheist Richard Dawkins unable to give a single example of beneficial mutations.
Here's Dawkins' response:
The Information Challenge | Australian Skeptics
Wow. Creationists being deceptive, not understanding evolution and framing the debate so absurdly no informed scientist could ever give a satisfactory answer. What a shock.
What?Quite frankly, I can't think of another prominent group of people who are so persistently and pathologically dishonest as creationists/evolution denialists.
IMO, they're the biggest pack of liars I've ever seen.
Yeah, but Jose, you have to realise they're lying for Jesus.Quite frankly, I can't think of another prominent group of people who are so persistently and pathologically dishonest as creationists/evolution denialists.
IMO, they're the biggest pack of liars I've ever seen.
what?In 2005 Kent Hovind claimed,
"Spanish conquistadors" in 1571 found drawings of dinosaurs on stones, and "on them you will see people doing brain and heart surgery as well as every known dinosaur clearly depicted. Several hundred of them show humans and dinosaurs together."
I don't like dishonesty in creationists arguments but it's a no win situation, if I don't believe in evolution then I am a liar by trait according to some. Also creationists are human like everyone else and make mistakes and stretch the truth to their advantage at times. We have seen out right fraud on the evolutionist side down through the years also.
In 2005 Kent Hovind claimed,
"Spanish conquistadors" in 1571 found drawings of dinosaurs on stones, and "on them you will see people doing brain and heart surgery as well as every known dinosaur clearly depicted. Several hundred of them show humans and dinosaurs together."