the earth is 13,000 years old not 6,000 right

[leroy]

I have given you both Google and the scientific pre print service, Arxiv which itself links to thousands of scientific papers on the accuracy and/or known (and stated) error margins.You appear determined to ignore them which is why i didn't waste my time by doing your work for you and providing individual papers

Of course I will ignore them ………remember I am using the atheist method

[
And still, you made the false claim and refused to defend it. So it seems that once again i won't be wasting my time arguing with dishonesty.

Because I am applying the atheist method, which allows me to make claims without justification

 

[leroy]

Proverbs 6:16-19

you shoudl buy one
Google Image Result for https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/simpsons/images/4/4b/Sarcasm_Detector.png/revision/latest?cb=20150903211302

 

[ChristineM]

Of course I will ignore them ………remember I am using the atheist method



Because I am applying the atheist method, which allows me to make claims without justification

Total ignorant bull

 

[ChristineM]

you shoudl buy one
Google Image Result for https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/simpsons/images/4/4b/Sarcasm_Detector.png/revision/latest?cb=20150903211302

Hide from the facts all you want, not my problem, not my life

 

[Subduction Zone]

I am using the atheist method, I don’t have to support my claims

No, you are not. You are also repeating a falsehood.

Ok show a single relevant claim made by me in this forum that has been refuted with sources.

No, I am not playing that silly game, but I will name one. Did you forget your hypothesis that the universe could be in a bubble and outside mass was causing the expansion? I refuted that and gave a valid source. It was rather basic mathematics. You could not understand it so of course you denied it. Your error is that because you cannot understand or refuse to understand refutations means that you have not been refuted. You blame others for your own lack of understanding.

If you don’t support that accusation, then why should I support my claims?

An improper demand on your part is not a valid excuse. We cannot help it if you refuse to raise even your mathematical skills to above the levels you should have had in your first year of college.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have given you both Google and the scientific pre print service, Arxiv which itself links to thousands of scientific papers on the accuracy and/or known (and stated) error margins.You appear determined to ignore them which is why i didn't waste my time by doing your work for you and providing individual papers

And still, you made the false claim and refused to defend it. So it seems that once again i won't be wasting my time arguing with dishonesty.

But he does not understand those, so they don't count

 

[leroy]

No, I am not playing that silly game, but I will name one. Did you forget your hypothesis that the universe could be in a bubble and outside mass was causing the expansion? I refuted that and gave a valid source. It was rather basic mathematics. You could not understand it so of course you denied it. Your error is that because you cannot understand or refuse to understand refutations means that you have not been refuted. You blame others for your own lack of understanding.

I am talking about claims related to the existence of God……….


Claims related to the arguments in favor of the existence of God…….

Can you quote a specific point of disagreement and explain why you disagree?


...

An improper demand on your part is not a valid excuse..

Why is it an improper demand to ask for your specific point of disagreement so that I can adress it?

 

[ChristineM]

But he does not understand those, so they don't count

That explains a lot, thanks