Nabeel Akhalwaya Motala said:
.......Wikipedia shouldn't ever be quoted in a religious site cause religion deals with facts and wikipedia can be altered by anyone.
Wrong on three counts. First, I quoted Wikipedia regarding a definition of Christian apologetics. The Wikpedia definition is definitely factual since it quotes lots of scholarly sources that are all involved with Christian apologetics. The question is, "What is Christian apologetics?" Wikipedia certainly adequately, and factually answers that question.
Second, no religion that makes supernatural claims deals with facts, only with alleged, unsupported facts. A God might exist, but not the God of any religious book. If a God exists, he certainly would not need to use books as a primary means of communicating with humans, especially since writing is a relatively new invention.
Third, Wikipedia cannot be altered by anyone. If you believe otherwise, please try to alter the article about Christian apologetics that I quoted, and let us know how successful you are.