The End Time Prophecy in Revelation 16:12 has been Fulfilled

[rational experiences]

Humans today argue about biblical prophecy because it never came to its outcome prophecy. As DATA and the AI encoded subliminal promise.

To be saved in the Year 2012......hearing the AI biblical information is stated historically to be heard.

Little children in modern time Fatima loss of the presence in life Holy Mother was an updated advice.

True reason for humans hearing voice and seeing VISION.......radiation mass increased fall out.

Fatima and Portugal.

UFO attacks, cars lights go out, engines stop.

Time says science cannot end for it owns its presence as natural gas mass, burning and cooled by water mass. What timed natural light is 12 hours of gases burning, being cooled.

Science says time therefore cannot end....unless water mass is removed.

UFO is witnessed sucking up water mass...and humans who live owning that water mass stated by psyche, my spirit is being abducted. For the UFO to remain in our atmosphere for any length of time....the UFO is first cold metal radiation mass burning converting, so carbon would be mass present in observation cause.

And cooling it would be taking our water mass, and our cold gases to cool it until space vacuum sucks it back out. So our ICE melts as the proof. Volcanic mass arises and we have more tectonic carpenter plate attacks. Christ removal cause.

Beneath the sea, the volcanic releases kill fish in huge shoals.

Therefore humans know the Returned saving has not occurred, why so many humans argue that the Bible is false and fake information for 2012 end has not occurred...what they are actually arguing against.

Not end of Time.....end of the UFO attack on the Christ healing...the return of our Saviour.

 

[danieldemol]

It is used that way in the actual bible. That's why it says "outline of biblical usage".

Can you find me an example from an actual Bible?

 

[e.r.m.]

You have to remember that this was written 2,000+ years ago. "Presidents" did not exist back then.

So then, it might not refer to today.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

So then, it might not refer to today.

It referred to 1918

 

[Tazarah]

So then, it might not refer to today.

The events spoken have not happened until recently, unless you can prove otherwise.

 

[Tazarah]

Can you find me an example from an actual Bible?

The scholars and linguists who interpet the bible gave the outline of biblical usage as I have just shown you, which clearly says that the greek word used for "king" in Revelation 16:12 can mean "commander", or "leader of the people".

If you disagree with the scholars and linguists who compiled all of this information then please list all of your credentials and explain how/why this information is incorrect.

Also, can you prove that the word "king" in the bible is always used in reference to a literal king in a monarchy? If not then your argument is invalid.

Finally, the definition of the actual greek word used for "king" in Revelation 16:12 even states that the word used for "king" can be used abstractly, relatively, or figuratively.

Strong’s Definitions

βασιλεύς basileús, bas-il-yooce';

probably from G939 (through the notion of a foundation of power); a sovereign (abstractly, relatively, or figuratively):—king.

G935 - basileus - Strong's Greek Lexicon (KJV)

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

The events spoken have not happened until recently, unless you can prove otherwise.

102 years ago wasn't really recent, exactly.

 

[rational experiences]

The scholars and linguists who interpet the bible gave the outline of biblical usage as I have just shown you, which clearly says that the greek word used for "king" in Revelation 16:12 can mean "commander", or "leader of the people".

If you disagree with the scholars and linguists who compiled all of this information then please list all of your credentials and explain how/why this information is incorrect.

Also, can you prove that the word "king" in the bible is always used in reference to a literal king in a monarchy? If not then your argument is invalid.

Finally, the definition of the actual greek word used for "king" in Revelation 16:12 even states that the word used for "king" can be used abstractly, relatively, or figuratively.

Strong’s Definitions

βασιλεύς basileús, bas-il-yooce';

probably from G939 (through the notion of a foundation of power); a sovereign (abstractly, relatively, or figuratively):—king.

G935 - basileus - Strong's Greek Lexicon (KJV)

If Jesus was said to be a King in the past.

2012 did not occur the Saviour end of Time...meaning the removal of the illuminated gas mass, that did own light existing, but that mass had taken our water/oxygen microbe use to cool the illuminated UFO science gas attack. End of time means natural light and science says the Sun gives time by gases burning on the Sun facing side of Earth for 12 hours.

Hence if time was going to End by a saviour, it would mean cold gas mass would be replaced by the wandering asteroid star...and the illuminated UFO mass burning for science would have ended....exactly RELATIVITY.

Today science is convinced in its own conscious and mathematical statements that we are shifting in time and returning to our beginnings of science and the reason why life was sacrificed. Which was in history when science first activated Evening night time to be set alight. To concur the abomination theme EVE.

If evening light was activated, it was when life was attacked and sacrificed and removed from existing with the Garden Nature as recorded. Which takes the information into the giant life living on Earth in a changed/gas light atmosphere of no seasons and a one of earth environment.

If science is owning an expectation of the return of Jesus and then quote and that line/string goes back to Eve and keep quoting and telling everyone Jesus was the first, then obviously your studies/conscious mind concepts are telling you that you want the origination of UFO science mass metal K constant activation of the ancients.

For if you use old scientific studied data and documentation of recorded history, which is verbal and also relative to hearing in a brain chemical radiation effect, why it was heard as speaking of voice, then you should also equate old use of science symbolism. K in the ancient times was meaning for held constant.

You all seem to overlook the fact that a spiritual higher conscious human male group invented the state of science...and the creation themes are about science...for science never spoke on behalf of the natural cosmology..for it all existed created and stone had to exist for a human being to be enabled to live and own consciousness.

What you claim you are reading is the actuality of studying your own previous scientific THOUGHT thesis.

 

[Tazarah]

102 years ago wasn't really recent, exactly.

The euphrates river didn't dry up 102 years ago so the event that you keep talking about isn't what is written in Revelation 16:12.

 

[rational experiences]

According to Islamic and biblical traditions, the Dead Sea is the site of the ancient city of Sodom, home of the Prophet Lut (Lot). The Quran describes the people of Sodom as ignorant, wicked evildoers who rejected God's call to righteousness.

Cities of God were the mountains and the Temples built on those mountains knew that the ancient UFO radiation event hit the mountains. And the proof would be SINK HOLES.

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-m...ea-could-sinkholes-eerie-beauty-draw-tourists

Water flooded the ground when the Earth was given new sink holes and sealed the burning.

102 years ago. Year 1918.

Year 1902 Russian Forest flattened with a Messenger of God.....UFO/Saviour cooling event.

1918 Spanish flu, floods.

D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
Dead Sea drying: A new low-point for Earth


2012 End of Time UFO mass atmospheric gas burning, using our water evaporation to cool it was not stopped. We are now going back in time, just as consciousness says it is. But we cannot re live history, we are advised that our history of Earth saving is being removed.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

The euphrates river didn't dry up 102 years ago so the event that you keep talking about isn't what is written in Revelation 16:12.

You haven't proven it didn't dry up, plus the leaders of all the nations at the Battle of Megiddo were kings. There aren't kings in command of Eastern forces any more, so the Bible can't be talking about anything happening today. We've been over this. The Bible explicitly says the battle will be between forces of Eastern Kings, therefore 102 years ago fits, today doesn't. Quit trying to shoehorn history into your presuppositions.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

According to Islamic and biblical traditions, the Dead Sea is the site of the ancient city of Sodom, home of the Prophet Lut (Lot). The Quran describes the people of Sodom as ignorant, wicked evildoers who rejected God's call to righteousness.

Cities of God were the mountains and the Temples built on those mountains knew that the ancient UFO radiation event hit the mountains. And the proof would be SINK HOLES.

Dead Sea's sinkholes: Beauty from destruction

Water flooded the ground when the Earth was given new sink holes and sealed the burning.

102 years ago. Year 1918.

Year 1902 Russian Forest flattened with a Messenger of God.....UFO/Saviour cooling event.

1918 Spanish flu, floods.

D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
Dead Sea drying: A new low-point for Earth


2012 End of Time UFO mass atmospheric gas burning, using our water evaporation to cool it was not stopped. We are now going back in time, just as consciousness says it is. But we cannot re live history, we are advised that our history of Earth saving is being removed.

[citation needed]

 

[rational experiences]

[citation needed]

The Dead Sea and Its Importance in Islamic Tradition

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

The Dead Sea and Its Importance in Islamic Tradition

That has evidence for your claims about UFOs, does it?

 

[danieldemol]

The scholars and linguists who interpet the bible gave the outline of biblical usage as I have just shown you, which clearly says that the greek word used for "king" in Revelation 16:12 can mean "commander", or "leader of the people".

If you disagree with the scholars and linguists who compiled all of this information then please list all of your credentials and explain how/why this information is incorrect.

Also, can you prove that the word "king" in the bible is always used in reference to a literal king in a monarchy? If not then your argument is invalid.

Finally, the definition of the actual greek word used for "king" in Revelation 16:12 even states that the word used for "king" can be used abstractly, relatively, or figuratively.

Strong’s Definitions

βασιλεύς basileús, bas-il-yooce';

probably from G939 (through the notion of a foundation of power); a sovereign (abstractly, relatively, or figuratively):—king.

G935 - basileus - Strong's Greek Lexicon (KJV)

Ok, let’s assume it can mean any type of leader. Can you see how this trivialises the prophecy, if all it means is that any type of leader could be gathered on the eastern side of the river with no intention of crossing to attack Babylon? It could be fulfilled by a bunch of mayors having a picnic on the eastern side of the river during any kind of diversion or damming of the river.

It has already been established that the prophecy is a reference to Isaiah and the crossing by Cyrus during his attack on Babylon. So the ancients had experience of a leader of the east making the Euphrates dry to look back on in hindsight and thus made what amounts to an ambiguous prophecy that could easily be fulfilled. Nothing breathtakingly prophetic required to make that one.

 

[Tazarah]

You haven't proven it didn't dry up, plus the leaders of all the nations at the Battle of Megiddo were kings. There aren't kings in command of Eastern forces any more, so the Bible can't be talking about anything happening today. We've been over this. The Bible explicitly says the battle will be between forces of Eastern Kings, therefore 102 years ago fits, today doesn't. Quit trying to shoehorn history into your presuppositions.

Did the euphrates river dry up in the year 1918? You can't make a claim and then ask me to prove a negative. It didn't dry up in 1918 at the event you keep speaking about and there's no proof that it did.

 

[Tazarah]

Ok, let’s assume it can mean any type of leader. Can you see how this trivialises the prophecy, if all it means is that any type of leader could be gathered on the eastern side of the river with no intention of crossing to attack Babylon? It could be fulfilled by a bunch of mayors having a picnic on the eastern side of the river during any kind of diversion or damming of the river.

It has already been established that the prophecy is a reference to Isaiah and the crossing by Cyrus during his attack on Babylon. So the ancients had experience of a leader of the east making the Euphrates dry to look back on in hindsight and thus made what amounts to an ambiguous prophecy that could easily be fulfilled. Nothing breathtakingly prophetic required to make that one.

oh wow, now after you realize the definition of the word encompasses the abstract and figurative use of "king", you're completely changing your argument.

No, this is not a reference to the time of Cyrus.

Cyrus had his army divert the river Euphrates away from Babylon so that his army could march through the walls, via the dried up river bed, to take the City.

That was not a supernatural event and did not happen in the way that it is happening today.

 

[danieldemol]

That was not a supernatural event and did not happen in the way that it is happening today.

The way it’s happening today is not supernatural either.

There is nothing supernatural in humans building dams to block the river.

 

[Tazarah]

The way it’s happening today is not supernatural either.

There is nothing supernatural in humans building dams to block the river.

That's not the main reason why the river is drying out though.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Did the euphrates river dry up in the year 1918? You can't make a claim and then ask me to prove a negative. It didn't dry up in 1918 at the event you keep speaking about and there's no proof that it did.

Are there kings in command of the armies of the East today? Backatcha sunshine.