• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Errors of Ancient Religious Teachings

Gotno Gizmo

Gotno Gizmo
With the Roman Catholic Church opposing contraception and with Islam teachings promoting the virtue of being fruitful (particularly in sons), and many other world religions advocating similar virtues, it is not surprising that the world’s population is escalating.
Resulting from human exploitation of fresh water, food and minerals upon the Earth, coupled with the polluting and destructive impact upon the eco system of humanity, can only mean increased suffering of both human and animal life in the not so distant future.
The optimistic view is that mankind will continue to develop new technologies in order to meet this challenge. The pessimistic view is that the use of increased chemical fertilisers to boost food production will poison the earth. That the use of genetically modified crops to boost food production will unlock reactions in plant life with unforeseen consequences.
We must be in denial if we believe that current world population growth is sustainable. The offending nations are those poorer countries where the provision of clean water and food are already problematic. Parents who foolishly believe that by having many children they will be supported by their children in their old age. They cannot understand that they are exacerbating their current supply shortfalls. The Islamic countries in dessert zones where practically all food is imported from greener pastures using their petrol dollars. What happens to them when the oil wells start to run dry, or oil export receipts can no longer cover the cost of continuously increasing global food prices, with more and more mouths to feed?
Many people (and I am one of them) believe that the planet will bite back. The future will witness, as a retaliation of human activity, more droughts, floods and disease (becoming immune to known medical treatments). The strains upon human kind will itself create an environment in which humanity will take up arms with one another, thus increasing the rate of their own extermination.
Meanwhile, our archaic religious teachings will continue promoting a future where the wonder of humanity is reduced to an ant like existence, scurrying shoulder to shoulder around the remaining habitable parts of the planet for survival, in which arts and culture have become have become nonexistent.

 
Don't worry, Gizmo. The population excess will be balanced with the same doctrines of at least one religion which teaches about lessening the number of population through a rather not so conventional method.
 

AxisMundi

E Pluribus Unum!!!
With the Roman Catholic Church opposing contraception and with Islam teachings promoting the virtue of being fruitful (particularly in sons), and many other world religions advocating similar virtues, it is not surprising that the world’s population is escalating.......

While I agree that some religions have self-propagating dogma built in (the Quiverfull movement comes immediately to mind) to increase their theopolitical power base, I believe you are mistaken in attributing some automatic causality between religion and the current global population.

Firstly, all three Abrahamics do not comprise even half of the global population.

And let us not forget China either, a heavily over-populated Nation that can hardly be categorized as an Abrahamic bastion.

One must also keep in mind that in agricultural areas, both historically and modern, especially those that do not enjoy modern medicine and technology, a large family is really the only option.

Children provide a ready workforce, not to mention the higher child-mortality rate inherent in such a setting.

Nature is a self-leveling/self-balancing paradigm. If humanity gets "too big for our britches", something will happen to curb our numbers and humanity will survive and live on.
 

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
I'm telling you... don't be pro-life or pro-choice, be like me and be anti-choice, anti-life -- abortions for ALL, 100% of the time!

Just kidding.
 

Noaidi

slow walker
We must be in denial if we believe that current world population growth is sustainable. The offending nations are those poorer countries where the provision of clean water and food are already problematic.

Whilst I'm in broad agreement with your OP, I take exception to the above. The 'offending nations' are those that can't live within their means. Blaming it all on the 'Third World' is, IMO, wrong. It is we in the over-consumptive rich nations that are responsible for planetary despoilation. Blaming everything on a mother of 8 (3 of whom may have died from diarrhoea), trying to raise her kids without adequate sanitation and little food, is not the problem.
The resource consumption of the West is what we need to address.
 
I'm telling you... don't be pro-life or pro-choice, be like me and be anti-choice, anti-life -- abortions for ALL, 100% of the time!

I prefer other alternatives such as adopting a gay or lesbian lifestyle or celibacy. That way you don't have to kill unborn children.

Roman catholic Church should encourage all it's members to enter the priesthood then other denominations including and especially Islam should follow it's suit.

The end of mankind that is
 
Top