SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Remember the song the Monkees, you sing that.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The first creature could not have come into being by random chance. It is impossible.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Not me. I am a man and not a primate.Well, we all are related to the other primates, so no shame there.
Remember the song the Monkees, you sing that to Poppa was a rolling stone.
Ah well, the blind and all that. You should study animal behaviour as well, to see the similarities that we share with other primates. But then you apparently can't imagine our precursors two or three hundred thousand years ago can you? Your loss. And we wouldn't be so different then from other primates - just a bit cleverer no doubt. And having no Bible to guide them.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I saw a chimp university and they were building their next space craft to land on the moon.Ah well, the blind and all that. You should study animal behaviour as well, to see the similarities that we share with other primates. But then you apparently can't imagine our precursors two or three hundred thousand years ago can you? Your loss. And we wouldn't be so different then from other primates - just a bit cleverer no doubt. And having no Bible to guide them.
Is that what you mean?
Common organs, functions and behaviors all prove an intelligent Creator, God.
How would you like me to leave my book collection to you when I die - might help somewhat.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I would just throw them in the trash if they are about evolution and billions of years.How would you like me to leave my book collection to you when I die - might help somewhat.
I did give away about 200 books on advanced physics, biology, chemistry, probability, statistics, and logic.
I also gave away over 200 King James Bibles.
So, couldn't understand the science ones then?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I had mastered that several times. Even tutored some.So, couldn't understand the science ones then?
Teaching apparent lies as well. How did you manage that? When people say they have half a mind to do that - is that you - half of your brain accepts the scientific explanations (the tutoring side), and the other half laughing at such idiocy. I can see that happening.
I'm not seeing anything that would indicate a mastery of science or rational discourse for that matter.So, couldn't understand the science ones then?
Someone trained in science would know that proof is not a standard of science and that claims require evidence and reasoned arguments. Scientists don't just declare victory and then spend papers and presentations avoiding their burden of proof while trying to pass it on to others or insult them when those others recognize the ploy.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
The "scientists" unfortunately are fooled.
I have already given several infallible proofs that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago and that the Bible is the true word of God.
I can't fathom how anyone with a decent education would fall for the Bible nonsense, as to ages, other than simply playing a game or taking on a hopeless perspective for trolling purposes.
Really?!? You have given "infallible" proofs? Why, then, that makes you God Himself.
So I guess you'd know!
wellwisher
Well-Known Member
The two science discoveries that correspond to the Bible's 6000 year old age of the universe, were the invention of written language and the first stable civilizations. These two pivotal changes made humans more sophisticated.I can't fathom how anyone with a decent education would fall for the Bible nonsense, as to ages, other than simply playing a game or taking on a hopeless perspective for trolling purposes.
Based on this data, I would conclude the Bible is not focusing on human DNA, but on an update in the human brain's operating system, leading to will and choice apart from the DNA. Adam and Eve are not formed by natural biological means, although Adam and Eve could both reproduce biologically. This paradox can be explained by an upgrade in the brain's operating system, to usher in a new modern human mind, still with human DNA. These two inventions accelerated this change. Today, we do not have to wait for evolution and DNA to make a change. We can use consciousness to tweak the DNA directly, using our mind and tools; consciousness leading the DNA. This will and choice appears suddenly.
The lost of paradise was connected to losing natural instinct in favor of will and choice. Adam and Eve had two sons, Cain and Abel. Cain was the tiller of soil and Abel was the herder of animals. When Cain kills Abel this symbolized farming; civilization, supersedes the migratory herding; instinct, that had been in affect for 10,000's of years. It is amazing instinct could just shut off; be taken away, and a new secondary ego center of will and choice is allowed to take over. If you know how to read symbol, one can learn more about this change.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
No but I read His book.Really?!? You have given "infallible" proofs? Why, then, that makes you God Himself.
So I guess you'd know!
So you have not much faith in evolution I take?
Coincidence? How long did we have any oral languages before any written ones?
On the other hand, these things just might be myths that the people of the time could relate to, and not intended for all time (and certainly not factual), given those around then would have no conception of what was to come in the future - just as we might not as to another few thousand years hence. Makes more sense to me than believing much literality exists in the Bible. I mean, the writers might have revealed some actual new information that couldn't have come from anywhere else other than some divine source but apparently not. Hence why we had to go through about two millennia of diseases without remedy and bad behaviour until new knowledge did actually come along - through the hard work of those who just concentrated on the issue at hand.
Then your reading skills are even worse than your science knowledge. Evolution is a much a "fact" as there can be.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Oh wow! He has a book now? Who was his publisher?
I don't understand it. I don't even know why it would matter except as some ham-handed attempt to reject science that scares those that claim it.I can't fathom how anyone with a decent education would fall for the Bible nonsense, as to ages, other than simply playing a game or taking on a hopeless perspective for trolling purposes.