The first creature could not have come into being by random chance. It is impossible.

[Dan From Smithville]

I don't think those people are being honest with themselves. They know more than they let on. They just suppress their knowledge of evolution.

For some, I'm starting to think that may be true, but of others, I think the knowledge they possess are the straw man versions they are fed.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I suppose it offers a metaphor of the conception of evolution as change over time.

I got a haircut yesterday so that proves evolution?
My are you reaching.

 

[metis]

The cited experiment was put together in a lab, right?

Not that I'm aware of. It stands to logic because there are mutations that occur both with r.n.a. and d.n.a.

 

[YoursTrue]

Thanks! I am glad to be back.

Yeah, i said demonstrated to be diplomatic because I know less about evolution than he does.

But it always confused me that people show odds when odds actually means that something is possible.

Unlikely is a word also. And, I might say, not only is there no proof, but really no evidence scientific or otherwise that the beginning of life and then evolution by unlikely chance actually happened.

 

[Samael_Khan]

Unlikely is a word also. And, I might say, not only is there no proof, but really no evidence scientific or otherwise that the beginning of life and then evolution by unlikely chance actually happened.

So unlikely doesn't mean impossible. So then you accept that there is a possibility that it happened? There is no scientific evidence or otherwise that god exists but people believe that.

 

[YoursTrue]

So unlikely doesn't mean impossible. So then you accept that there is a possibility that it happened? There is no scientific evidence or otherwise that god exists but people believe that.

Correct. Unlikely doesn't mean impossible.
I believe there is evidence that God exists and I also believe that the evidence that God exists is greater than the evidence of evolution stemming from chance meeting burgeoning out. The evidence is life and the beauty around us. Also I believe the Bible is a gift from God so that I understand more.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I got a haircut yesterday so that proves evolution?
My are you reaching.

I'm reaching says the person that has created 39 threads all saying the same thing and all doing nothing.

 

[John53]

I'm reaching says the person that has created 39 threads all saying the same thing and all doing nothing.

39! I've got a bit of catching up to do.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

39! I've got a bit of catching up to do.

That was as of this morning. I was curious.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

39! I've got a bit of catching up to do.

I imagine you are joking, since I haven't seen anything that would require catching up on.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I'm reaching says the person that has created 39 threads all saying the same thing and all doing nothing.

They are all different evidences that disprove evolution and billions of years

 

[John53]

They are all different evidences that disprove evolution and billions of years

To whom?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

To whom?

To those that consider them and are not blinded by the false assumptions and circular reasoning which undergird evolution and billions of years

 

[Mock Turtle]

To those that consider them and are not blinded by the false assumptions and circular reasoning which undergird evolution and billions of years

But not you, who is apparently blinded by a literal belief in an old book.

 

[YoursTrue]

You might want to Google undergird. It means to form a support or foundation. You've refuted yourself again. Maybe a Freudian slip?

I don't think so. Meaning to undergird or support a teaching again does not mean it's true. Ever watch who done it crime shows? Sometimes even with the most detailed evidence, juries and judges get it wrong. Meantime, while I see how evolutionists use evidence to support the throry, it does not mean that there is no intelligence behind the mechanisms of life forms.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

They are all different evidences that disprove evolution and billions of years

They are all evidence that you reject science while doing nothing to challenge the knowledge obtained through science.

I assume it makes you feel better and seem to yourself as if you are doing something.

I would remind you that it is a well-known fact that parrots can repeat too and neither has any of that repetition refuted science.

Whether live or Memorex, your posts fail to live up to their advertising.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

They are all evidence that you reject science while doing nothing to challenge the knowledge obtained through science.

I assume it makes you feel better and seem to yourself as if you are doing something.

I would remind you that it is a well-known fact that parrots can repeat too and neither has any of that repetition refuted science.

Whether live or Memorex, your posts fail to live up to their advertising.

And the parrot is proof that evolution is false.

 

[Mock Turtle]

And the parrot is proof that evolution is false.

Because that is what you are doing - parroting the Bible (without doing any thinking)?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

And the parrot is proof that evolution is false.

Not at all. NOTHING you have done is evidence against the theory of evolution and does nothing to explain the phenomenon of evolution.

NOTHING you have done has cast doubt on the age of the Earth or the universe as determined by study and the application of the scientific method.

It is just you repeating things and ignoring others. I don't know of any skill or special knowledge required to do that. As I pointed out, parrots, recorders, and echoes can repeat without understanding or being correct. If this is the means you believe you have been called to perform, I can only conclude that you have been left without any guidance or tools to get the job done beyond repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating...

What I see is a person that wants things to be the way they believe and are willing to repeat that desire incessantly while seeming to do it with metaphorical fingers in the ears, ignoring rational discourse and evidence to the contrary.

I have to ask myself, is that really good witness for the belief or is it just stubborn personal pride, ignorance and worship of a particular interpretation?

I believe I know the answer and don't see any particular need to respond further to what I see as feeding meaningless repetition in a vacuum.

 

[exchemist]

Unlikely is a word also. And, I might say, not only is there no proof, but really no evidence scientific or otherwise that the beginning of life and then evolution by unlikely chance actually happened.

Nobody says evolution occurred by chance. It occurred by natural selection. That is not chance,