SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It sure does.
Religion is just a belief as to how we got here, where we will end up and what should we do in the mean time.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The first living thing could not have come into being by random chance, therefore, God Almighty created all things. Just 1 proof.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Religion is just a belief as to how we got here, where we will end up and what should we do in the mean time.
That's a part of what a religion is, sure
But a religion is many more than just those things
And evolution does not have those things in common with religion
Just because you want it to be a religion doesn't make it one I'm afraid
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It sure does as liberal society which is part of the religion of evolution is spewing out its dogma of how everyone should act, speak, and think.
As told by - someone or other - but should be believed as truth - because you simply accept such?
Oh, the choices available!
How is evolution Liberal?
It is politically neutral, it is true regardless of anyone's political beliefs
And how on Earth does the theory of evolution tell people how to act, speak, and think?????
I think you meant to say that it interfers with fundamentalist Christianity's efforts to tell everyone how to act, speak, and think????
gnostic
The Lost One
All of these numbers are without contexts.
where do you get these utter craps from…where do you get this “100,000 amino acids” from?
Now unless you can give a specific sequence, the numbers are just distractions, smoke and mirrors strawman.
which sequence are you talking about? What is this sequence supposed to do? Without naming the name of sequence, your number is meaningless.
And beside all that…there only about over 500 known types of amino acids. Of those >500, only 22 types of amino acids are required, to form in number different types of proteins. It is these 22 types of amino acids that are building blocks of proteins.
So unless you name a specific protein, then -
- you don’t know what sequence required to form that proteins;
- you don’t know how many specific “types” amino acids require in that “sequence”;
- nor would you know how many total amino acids, to form the sequence of that particular protein.
There are many types of proteins, and they each have their own specific characteristics and functions. Depending on the particular protein, the numbers of amino acids would verify. But it hard to say, WHEN YOU CANNOT EVEN NAME THE SEQUENCE or WHEN YOU CANNOT NAME THE PROTEIN.
In the OP, you have left sequences as vague as possible. What sequences are talking about? Which one? If you cannot tell us, then like I said, your 100,000 amino acids are just smoke and mirrors, to distract us with meaningless numbers and to hide the fact that you are a science illiterate…or more precisely, to hide the fact that you’re a biology illiterate.
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
None of that is scientific evidence for a flood. You do not even know what is and what is not scientific evidence. To even have scientific evidence one needs a testable hypothesis first.
What is their hypothesis and what reasonable test based upon predictions of their model could possibly refute it?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Actually, it's the other way around.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
No liberalism is a religion.
It is certainly not liberal as being for freedom.
It is totalitarian.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
You invent your own definitions. Here's the reality:
Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse various views depending on their understanding of these principles but generally support private property, market economies, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), liberal democracy, secularism, rule of law, economic and political freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion,[2][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] constitutional government and privacy rights.[11] Liberalism is frequently cited as the dominant ideology of modern history. -- Liberalism - Wikipedia
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
From the Oxford Dictionary:
lib·er·al
[ˈlib(ə)rəl]
ADJECTIVE
liberal (adjective) · Liberal (adjective)
lib·er·al
[ˈlib(ə)rəl]
ADJECTIVE
liberal (adjective) · Liberal (adjective)
- willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas:
"they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"
- (in a political context) favoring policies that are socially progressive and promote social welfare. Often contrasted with conservative.
"they favor liberal ideologies over conservative ones" - THEOLOGY
regarding many traditional beliefs as dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.
- (in a political context) favoring policies that are socially progressive and promote social welfare. Often contrasted with conservative.
- relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise:
"a liberal democratic state"...
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not so. But only true liberals can really understand liberalism.
Is that how one wins an argument?
You are as good at understanding politics as you are science!
An F minus in both I should think
If even that but at least you can write your own name
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Thanks