• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Flood & Worldwide Festivals of the Dead — the connection.

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
And what’s your viable “testable model” supporting the Earth forming by accretion?
I told you on the other thread that you needed to demonstrate a minimal amount of honesty and I would immediately post a response. All that you have to do is to admit what everyone else already knows. That you are scientifically illiterate. You endlessly demonstrate that you do not understand either the scientific method or the concept of scientific evidence. Which is why I can keep shooting down your arguments so easily with the fact that you still have no evidence.

I can and will give you the answer. But I need a sign first.
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
There's no Deluge myth in Kemetic religion (Ancient Egyptian) and it's one of the oldest recorded religions in history, with the oldest recorded body of religious literature (the Pyramid Texts). I note your source says 'with the exception of the Negro races', so could be referring to this absence. However, if one of the oldest known religious traditions hasn't any mention of it, I think this hurts your theory.

I am not in doubt there was a massive flood, but how massive is still up for debate because Africans don't mention it. The Europeans have it because their religions come from the Indo-European and Indo-Aryan traditions in the Fertile Crescent that also gave birth to Dharmic faiths, so naturally they have different takes on similar/the same myths. Kemetic faith, not being of these religious families, lacks any such shared stories.

@Rival @Bharat Jhunjhunwala

What about local flooding in Jalore Ancient India?

This thread is about: The Flood & Worldwide Festivals of the Dead — the connection.

@Rival you wrote, "The Europeans have it because their religions come from the Indo-European and Indo-Aryan traditions in the Fertile Crescent that also gave birth to Dharmic faiths, so naturally they have different takes on similar/the same myths."

My question to @Bharat Jhunjhunwala during the pre-flooding and flooding and soon after the flooding in Jalore Ancient India, were these people already understanding Dharmic faiths? Did Vaivaswat Manu know about Dharmic faiths?


 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
I don't think a massive worldwide flood that every other culture recorded would be easily forgotten. It'd be like asking folks to forget the 11th September 2001. The plain truth is, they have no such myth.

Did Kemetism (ancient, not modern) encompass all of Egyptian religion?

Because the god Ra is seen as acting against mankind. Humanity had plotted against Ra himself and then Ra called a council of the gods to decide what to do with these “children” of his Eye / Sekhmet.

However, Sekhmet goes too far with her destruction, and Ra, feeling remorse, stops her by sending a flood. He uses barley to make beer. and floods the land of Egypt with it. Sekhmet is attracted to the beer and drinks; she becomes drunk and forgets about what she’s doing. Only a few humans are saved and they begin a new life.

Interesting though, that in this retelling, the Flood was used to save humans.


And just another point: it wouldn’t be accurate to imply all “Africans” didn’t have a Flood Myth, if only a few tribes didn’t. The Masai do have a flood myth…. and they don’t have any “flooding rivers” or the like — to my knowledge — to influence their cultural lore. (Which seems to be the main excuse used to explain the phenomenon of the universality of these flood myths from unrelated cultures.)
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
Do we know for a fact that "in the deep" refers to water?

@The Hammer @GoodAttention

What does that mean in the deep?
What would Manu mean in the Norse language?


Ancient Egypt lasted for 3,000+ years. I think we'd at least find something. Neither they nor their African brethren relate any flood myths. The most straightforward conclusion is that they hadn't any.

Who's Noah or Vaivaswat Manu and anything that happened in the deep, or were they able to remain in a boat, but what about the other people?

With the Norse language, were there any floods being told? What is 'in the deep' in the Norse language? What would Manu mean in the Norse language?
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
Who's Noah or Vaivaswat Manu and anything that happened in the deep, or were they able to remain in a boat, but what about the other people?

With the Norse language, were there any floods being told? What is 'in the deep' in the Norse language? What would Manu mean in the Norse language?
Noah and the global flood is a myth in Genesis. It teaches important lessons, like how much God hates sin, and the value of all species of life.

Vaivaswat Manu appears to be a Hindu deity, the progenitor of human beings, and I really don't know anything about him.

It appears that Norse mythology does have some kind of flood myth, but it is a minor thing.

What makes you think a Hindu concept like Manu would be found in a completely different religion?
 

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
@The Hammer @GoodAttention

What does that mean in the deep?
What would Manu mean in the Norse language?



Who's Noah or Vaivaswat Manu and anything that happened in the deep, or were they able to remain in a boat, but what about the other people?


With the Norse language, were there any floods being told? What is 'in the deep' in the Norse language? What would Manu mean in the Norse language?

I'll present my opinion on this as best as I can to the deluge myth, which I believe is specific to 3 important factors all relating to the one event.

(1) Rise in sea levels
(2) Melting of glaciers in the northern hemisphere
(3) Loss of traversible or arrable land

This occurred over a 20,000 year time period of human history, with some areas of the world, and therefore different population groups, noticing one or more of these events. I say notice because small changes take time, but over time these add to give a much larger picture. In ancient times the necessity to convey "oral history" would have been imperitive for the development of -

(4) Language itself
(5) Survival traits
(6) Tribal identity

Make no mistake. The difference of the Earth's surface, and what our ancestors experienced, when sea levels were at their lowest compared to at their current highest is drasticially significant. This is "codified" within the "deluge" myths that different groups of people have told.

The fact that not all groups have a specific deluge myth story is because not all groups were exposed to all the same factors (1) - (3). To look at why, we would need to look at what the Earth looked like 20,000 years ago in the areas we are considering, for example Egypt, and see how it changed over the years.The theological significance is separate, particularly when we consider our ancient times when our "connection" to the Earth itself would have been much deeper and also dependent.

If the Earth has changed has man also changed? Yes, we are now "new" man, different from our ancestors who were "birthed and bathed in shallower oceans". Hebrew scriptures give a reason for this, as do the Vedas, and other belief systems.
 
Last edited:

River Sea

Well-Known Member
I'll present my opinion on this as best as I can to the deluge myth, which I believe is specific to 3 important factors all relating to the one event.

(1) Rise in sea levels
(2) Melting of glaciers in the northern hemisphere
(3) Loss of traversible or arrable land

This occurred over a 20,000 year time period of human history, with some areas of the world, and therefore different population groups, noticing one or more of these events. I say notice because small changes take time, but over time these add to give a much larger picture. In ancient times the necessity to convey "oral history" would have been imperitive for the development of -

(4) Language itself
(5) Survival traits
(6) Tribal identity

Make no mistake. The difference of the Earth's surface, and what our ancestors experienced, when sea levels were at their lowest compared to at their current highest is drasticially significant. This is "codified" within the "deluge" myths that different groups of people have told.

The fact that not all groups have a specific deluge myth story is because not all groups were exposed to all the same factors (1) - (3). To look at why, we would need to look at what the Earth looked like 20,000 years ago in the areas we are considering, for example Egypt, and see how it changed over the years.The theological significance is separate, particularly when we consider our ancient times when our "connection" to the Earth itself would have been much deeper and also dependent.

If the Earth has changed has man also changed? Yes, we are now "new" man, different from our ancestors who were "birthed and bathed in shallower oceans". Hebrew scriptures give a reason for this, as do the Vedas, and other belief systems.

@GoodAttention

How has Hebrew scriptures give reason about birthed and bathed in shallower oceans, who was prefect ruler during this time?

How has Ancient Egypt area of land changed from 20,000 years ago? What was flooding 20,000 years ago compared to flooding during Noah and Vaivaswat Manu, 3000 BCE? What were the similarities and differences in these flooding?

Thread: The Flood & Worldwide Festivals of the Dead — the connection.

@GoodAttention what does that mean festivals of the dead?

Mr. [Robert Grant] Halliburton says : “The festival of the dead, or feast of ancestors, is now, or was, formally observed at or near the beginning of November by the Peruvians, the Hindus, the Pacific Islanders, the people of the Tonga Islands, the Australians, the ancient Persians, the ancient Egyptians and the northern nations of Europe, and continued for three days among the Japanese, the Hindus, the Australians, the ancient Romans and the ancient Egyptians.

@GoodAttention @Hockeycowboy

The festival of the dead.
observed by the Peruvians, the Hindus, did these people know Tamil language?

this feast was celebrated among the ancient Peruvians at the same time and on the same day that Christians solemnize their commemoration of the dead —2nd November.”
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
@GoodAttention

How has Hebrew scriptures give reason about birthed and bathed in shallower oceans, who was prefect ruler during this time?
I'm pretty familiar with the Hebrew sacred texts, but I don't recognize what you are referring to.

In general, the Tanakh presents a cosmology where a flat earth rests on water, has water all around it, and has a water dome above the stars. In other words, something completely fictitious.
How has Ancient Egypt area of land changed from 20,000 years ago?
20,000 years ago the earth was in the middle of an ice age. The climate in Egypt was colder and wetter. The Sahara desert was not as extensive, and was dotted with rivers and lakes. The Nile would have been a larger river, and of course its flow patterns would have been different. The coastline would have been further out due to the drop in sea level. And of course there was no civilization yet. The humans there were hunter gatherers. None of the famous pyramids or the sphinx was built yet.
What was flooding 20,000 years ago compared to flooding during Noah and Vaivaswat Manu, 3000 BCE? What were the similarities and differences in these flooding?
I assume you are talking about the yearly flooding of the Nile.

During the Ice Age and the subsequent millennia, the Nile may have had more consistent and possibly higher flood levels due to a wetter climate. This meant more reliable water sources for irrigation and farming.
The festival of the dead.
observed by the Peruvians, the Hindus, did these people know Tamil language?
Tamil (which evolved from Proto-Dravidian) was probably spoken by the Hindus, but not by the natives of Peru. People on different continents that have never traveled to the other continent don't ever speak the same language.

Proto-Dravidian originated around 4000-6000 years ago. The version called "Old Tamil" was spoken around 300-600 CE. Middle Tamil ranged from 600-1300 CE. Modern Tamil has been spoken since around 1300 CE.
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
@GoodAttention what are your thoughts about this

Tamil (which evolved from Proto-Dravidian) was probably spoken by the Hindus, but not by the natives of Peru. People on different continents that have never traveled to the other continent don't ever speak the same language.

Proto-Dravidian originated around 4000-6000 years ago. The version called "Old Tamil" was spoken around 300-600 CE. Middle Tamil ranged from 600-1300 CE. Modern Tamil has been spoken since around 1300 CE.
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
I assume you are talking about the yearly flooding of the Nile.

I didn't know there were yearly flooding of the Nile


Down the Nile Valley
Every summer, the Nile flooded, carrying rich silt from volcanic uplands onto ancient Egyptian fields. The floodwaters also washed out salts that irrigation and evaporation left in the soil. The river’s annual cycle of renewing fertility nurtured a civilization that lasted nearly 5,000 years. The Egyptians called their land Kemet, or black land. The desert frontiers were Deshret, or red land. Ironically, the modern Aswan Dam now keeps the water table high, and irrigation leads to soil salinity.
 

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
@GoodAttention what are your thoughts about this

Tamil (which evolved from Proto-Dravidian) was probably spoken by the Hindus, but not by the natives of Peru. People on different continents that have never traveled to the other continent don't ever speak the same language.

The problem with any "Proto" language is we don't know exactly how far removed it is from the descendant language.

The inclusion of "Hindus" complicates the matter, because to me Hindu = Vedas = Sanskrit, and we know Sanskrit has Tamil loan words and vice versa. I would compare this somewhat to Jesus being a Jew in Judea but speaking Aramaic? It doesn't give us a full picture.

I would agree any connection to Peru would be difficult to establish.

Proto-Dravidian originated around 4000-6000 years ago. The version called "Old Tamil" was spoken around 300-600 CE. Middle Tamil ranged from 600-1300 CE. Modern Tamil has been spoken since around 1300 CE.

As I mentioned before, we would need to understand how equivalent or not "Proto-Dravidian" is to Tamil.

As I now say to my Jewish friends, it is a small உலகம் (ulakam, world).
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
20,000 years ago the earth was in the middle of an ice age. The climate in Egypt was colder and wetter. The Sahara desert was not as extensive, and was dotted with rivers and lakes. The Nile would have been a larger river, and of course its flow patterns would have been different. The coastline would have been further out due to the drop in sea level. And of course there was no civilization yet. The humans there were hunter gatherers. None of the famous pyramids or the sphinx was built yet.

@IndigoChild5559

After asking you all this I went and look online
Saw online yes ice can make land sink
Yes, ice sheets can cause land to sink through a process called glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA):


How did people learn that earth was an ice age? What would have happened if earth was never an ice age?

What type of ice was in the ice age compared to ice that's happening now? Is the ice different or the same? If the ice is larger without any dividing areas, how heavy is it?

Could it sink or cave some of the land? The answer is yes. I looked online.

If there's any dividing area of the ice, would it cause the ice not to be as heavy and the land to be safer, not danger to sink in or cave in? What would had happened, if all land caved in due to ice? Would land be gone? As ice will do what with land? How heavy does ice need to be to do that to land?

Found this online - found it. Ice sinks in land

AI Overview
Learn more…Opens in new tab

Yes, ice sheets can cause land to sink through a process called glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA):
  • Ice sheets weigh on the land
    During the last ice age, ice sheets covered much of the Northern Hemisphere, including parts of North America. The weight of the ice caused the land to sag and stretch, similar to how pressing down on a balloon causes the center to go down and the edges to bulge.
  • Ice sheets retreat
    About 12,000 years ago, the ice sheets began to retreat.
  • Land rises and sinks
    As the ice sheets retreated, the land began to rebalance, with the areas that were pushed down rising and the areas that bulged falling. This process is still ongoing today, and is known as glacial isostatic adjustment.
  • Some areas are sinking more than others
    For example, the Mid-Atlantic region is sinking more rapidly than the northeastern U.S. because the edge of the ice sheet ran through northern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
  • Some areas are rising more than others
    Regions where the ice sheets used to be are currently rising, in some cases at rates of up to 20 mm per year.
  • Some areas are sinking permanently
    In areas with clay and silt, removing water can permanently close the pores in the soil, causing the land to drop.

  • Subsidence | Regional Sea Level
    Known as glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), this process is the ongoing response of Earth's surface to the retreat of the great i...
    1727228553446.png

    NASA Sea Level Change Portal


  • What is glacial isostatic adjustment?
    Jun 16, 2024
    1727228553475.png

    NOAA's National Ocean Service


  • America's Sinking East Coast - NASA Earth Observatory
    Feb 19, 2024 — Part of the reason that the Mid-Atlantic is sinking more rapidly than the northeastern U.S. is because the edge of the...

    NASA Earth Observatory


  • Show all

Generative AI is experimental.
 
Last edited:

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I'll present my opinion on this as best as I can to the deluge myth, which I believe is specific to 3 important factors all relating to the one event.

(1) Rise in sea levels
(2) Melting of glaciers in the northern hemisphere
(3) Loss of traversible or arrable land

This occurred over a 20,000 year time period of human history, with some areas of the world, and therefore different population groups, noticing one or more of these events. I say notice because small changes take time, but over time these add to give a much larger picture. In ancient times the necessity to convey "oral history" would have been imperitive for the development of -

(4) Language itself
(5) Survival traits
(6) Tribal identity

Make no mistake. The difference of the Earth's surface, and what our ancestors experienced, when sea levels were at their lowest compared to at their current highest is drasticially significant. This is "codified" within the "deluge" myths that different groups of people have told.

The fact that not all groups have a specific deluge myth story is because not all groups were exposed to all the same factors (1) - (3). To look at why, we would need to look at what the Earth looked like 20,000 years ago in the areas we are considering, for example Egypt, and see how it changed over the years.The theological significance is separate, particularly when we consider our ancient times when our "connection" to the Earth itself would have been much deeper and also dependent.

If the Earth has changed has man also changed? Yes, we are now "new" man, different from our ancestors who were "birthed and bathed in shallower oceans". Hebrew scriptures give a reason for this, as do the Vedas, and other belief systems.
In reference to ice both in the Arctic and Antarctic regions, I will present only right now findings of researchers regarding life under the Arctic ice: The rich marine life under frozen ice
And there's more than marine life. Some life adapts to drastically changing conditions. :)
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
@IndigoChild5559

After asking you all this I went and look online
Saw online yes ice can make land sink
Yes, ice sheets can cause land to sink through a process called glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA):
I enjoyed reading the facts you uncovered. Thanks. :)

Remember that I am not a scientist. I have a good basic understanding of science. But I'm really not a good source. Your best bet is to do exactly as you did--look for online science sites. YouTube usually has a good bunch of videos on science topics, and I bet you can find some on i.e. India during the ice age. That said, I will do the best I can to address your questions.

Yes, glaciers can cause the land that they are on to sink. The bigger the glacier, of course the more it weighs.

During the ice ages (there have been many), glaciation begins at the poles (in fact, even today we have incredible glaciers near the poles). Because so much of the world's water is caught up in being ice, it makes the amount of liquid water in the oceans decrease. That results in the surface of the oceans being lower. And of course, if the ocean is lower, that means more land is exposed on the continents. Imagine a beach, and the tide goes out, so the beach becomes bigger. It is similar to that, but on a world wide scale.

In the case of Egypt, it far enough away from the poles that it didn't have any glaciers weighing it down. Rather, it became just a bit larger because of the sinking oceans. Sea level was about 400 feet lower, so for example, although the Mediterranean Sea was still there, it was smaller.

Of all the continents, Africa was the least affected by the ice age. There were other areas of the world where lakes and seas simply disappeared. The Persian Gulf was land. The islands of the South Pacific like Borneo were all connected in one big landmass. Siberia and Alaska were connected.

How did people learn that earth was an ice age? What would have happened if earth was never an ice age?
The evidence I have personally learned about was the evidence of glaciers. Glaciers travel very slowly, but they can carve out rock. So for example, while a running river will carve out a V-shaped valley, a glacier will carve out a U-shaped valley. So wherever you find a U-shaped valley, you can be certain that at some time in the past, a glacier was there. And, basically, this evidence shows there were a LOT of glaciers, and much further south than they are today.

There are other signs that glaciers were once there as well. Glaciers will push rocks in front of them, so that you might find a rock that is completely out of place, because it was brought their by a glacier. A moraine is when you have a whole bunch of rocks that were pushed forward together, and then when the glacier melted, it just left these pile.

I want to thank the many park rangers of Yosemite National Park for all their education about how Yosemite Valley was formed by glaciers. How strange that I learned these things when I was seven, and still remember them at age 63.
What type of ice was in the ice age compared to ice that's happening now? Is the ice different or the same? If the ice is larger without any dividing areas, how heavy is it?
Ice is ice. It's all frozen water. Sometimes its fluffier, like a snow back, and sometimes just a complete chunk. Glaciers form from sea water, but I don't know much about that. It also happens when it just keeps snowing and snowing, and the snow at the bottom never has a chance to melt. The weight of the snow on top condenses it so that it is much thicker than a normal snow bank.

The climate of the earth has always swung back and forth between hot and cold.

Because we still have huge ice sheets places like Greenland and Antarctica, we are technically still in an ice age. But compared to 20,000 years ago? We are much warmer than then. Imagine the ice from the north pole coming so far south that it covered half of North America. THAT was how it was 20,000 years ago.

And even that ice age wasn't the worst one. 720 to 635 million years ago, the planet was completely or nearly completely covered by ice. This era is sometimes nicknamed "Snowball Earth."

And similarly, the earth becomes very warm at times. There have been ages millions of years ago when there were no polar caps at all, no glaciers anywhere.

These changes happen extremely slowly, so slow that life adapts and evolves. This is quite different from the global warming we are experiencing today, which is happening so fast that many animal species simply will not survive because they haven't had the time to evolve. We are expecting a Mass Extinction.
Could it sink or cave some of the land? The answer is yes. I looked online.
You did good work :)
 
Last edited:

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
As I mentioned before, we would need to understand how equivalent or not "Proto-Dravidian" is to Tamil.
And of course, all of that is above my paygrade. I try to learn from philologists, but I understand very little of how they reach their conclusions. That's why they are the experts and I'm not. :)
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
You endlessly demonstrate that you do not understand either the scientific method or the concept of scientific evidence.
Lol! Please! Lol.

If you really adhered to the scientific method as much as you claim, you wouldn’t support most of the concepts you do, like Earth’s formation through accretion.

You just agree with explanations that reinforce your biases.

Examples:

And of course having life come from a meteorite would be just moving the time of abiogenesis back. Natural abiogenesis is still the most likely source of life by a longshot.

Where’s the scientific method here?

Without a testable hypothesis by definition you cannot have evidence in the world of science.

That doesn’t stop you.


….from the definition of "scientific evidence" to even have scientific evidence one must first have a testable hypothesis.

&

In the sciences to even have evidence one first needs a testable hypothesis.

Apply it to yourself.

And then ask yourself (since science is your god): how much do I believe, that isn’t tested by a hypothesis or supported by the scientific method?
 
Last edited:

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
@ChristineM , @nPeace, @Bree, @Vee
I think most posters on RF, believe the Flood is myth: not based on evidence. But a few here accept the Flood as a literal, global event.

Anyway, let me get to these “Festivals of the Dead”. Is there a link? I’m sure that people would consider the Global Flood as described in the Bible and in many myths, whether believed or not, as unique in killing more humans than any other Event. It would be the greatest cause for remembering the dead!

The following is from “Worship of the Dead” by John Garnier, published 1904, containing many references, which are included here...block parentheses [] I’ve added, to clarify, and bold type & italics are mine, to highlight. (I didn’t highlight the ubiquitous nature of the Flood myths):

“Chapter 1
Introductory — the Deluge

There are some modern writers who have represented the various religious superstitions and idolatries of different nations as being the spontaneous invention of each race, and the natural and uniform outcome of human nature in a state of barbarism. This is not the case; the theory is wholly opposed to the conclusions of those who have most fully studied the subject. The works of [George Stanley] Faber, Sir W[illiam] Jones, [Dr. Richard] Pococke, [Alexander] Hislop, Sir [John] G[ardner] Wilkinson, [George] Rawlinson and others have indisputably proved the connection and identity of the religious systems of nations most remote from each other, showing that, not merely Egyptians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans, but also the Hindus, the Buddhists of China and of Thibet, the Goths, Anglo-Saxons, Druids, Mexicans and Peruvians, the aborigines of Australia, and even the savages of the South Sea Islands *A*, must have all derived their religious ideas from a common source and a common centre. Everywhere we find the most startling coincidences in rites, ceremonies, customs, traditions, and in the names and relations of their respective gods and goddesses. [***This is discussed in detail in this book***]

————————-

*A*Mr [John Dunmore] Lang quotes Sir Stamford Raffles and [William] Marsden as stating that there was one original language common to the South Sea islands and to Sumatra, New Guinea, Madagascar and the Philippines. He says the language of the Polynesians has also a remarkable resemblance to that of the Chinese, and that their religious customs are similar to those of the Mexicans, Peruvians, Phoenicians and Egyptians, the name even of their Sun god being “Ra”, as in Peru and Egypt. (Lang’s “Polynesia,” pp. 19,20,41-44. See also Taylor’s “New Zealand” and Gill’s “Myths of the South Pacific”.)

————————-


There is no more convincing evidence of this fact than the common tradition in all these nations of the Deluge, as collected by Mr. Faber, and more lately by the additional traditions of the Mandan and other north American Indians, in Mr. [George] Catlin’s interesting work on those tribes *B*, showing that, with the exception of the Negro races, there is hardly a nation or tribe in the world which does not possess a tradition of the destruction of the human race by a flood; and the details of these traditions are too exactly in accordance with each other to permit the suggestion, which some have made, that they refer to different local floods in each case. Now Mr. Faber has exhaustively shown in his three folio volumes that the mythologies of all the ancient nations are interwoven with the events of the Deluge and are explained by it, thereby proving that they are all based on a common principle, and must have been derived from a common source.

—————————-

*B*Faber, Pagan Idolatry, book iii. chap. vi. vol. ii.; Catlin, “North American Indians”. A general summary of these traditions has also been collected by Sir H. H. Howorth in his work, “The Mammoth and the Flood.”

————————-


The force of this argument is illustrated by the fact of the observance of a great festival of the dead in commemoration of the event, not only by nations more or less in communication with each other, but by others widely separated, both by the ocean and by centuries of time. This festival is, moreover, held by all on or about the very day on which, according to the Mosaic account, the Deluge took place, viz., “The 17th day of the second month” — the month nearly corresponding with our November. [See Genesis 7:11]


The Jewish civil year commenced at the autumnal equinox, or about September 20, and the 17th day of the second month would therefore correspond with the fifth day of our month of November; but as the festival was originally, as in Egypt, preceded by three days’ mourning, it appears to have been put back three days in countries where one day’s festival only was observed, and to have been more generally kept on November 2nd.


Mr. [Robert Grant] Halliburton says : “The festival of the dead, or feast of ancestors, is now, or was, formally observed at or near the beginning of November by the Peruvians, the Hindus, the Pacific Islanders, the people of the Tonga Islands, the Australians, the ancient Persians, the ancient Egyptians and the northern nations of Europe, and continued for three days among the Japanese, the Hindus, the Australians, the ancient Romans and the ancient Egyptians.


“Wherever the Roman Catholic Church exists, solemn Mass for All Souls is said on the 2nd November, and on that day the gay Parisians, exchanging the boulevard for the cemetery, lunch at the graves of their relatives and hold unconsciously their “feast of ancestors” on the very same day that savages in far-distant quarters of the globe observe, in a similar manner, their festival of the dead. Even the Church of England, which rejects All Souls as based on a belief in purgatory and as being a creation of Popery, clings devoutly to All Saints.” *C* Again, with reference to the Peruvian festival of the dead, Mr. Haliburton writes:—“The month in which it occurs, says Rivers, is called ‘Aya Marca,’ from ‘Aya,’ a ‘corpse,’ and ‘Marca,’ ‘carrying in arms,’ because they celebrated the solemn festival of the dead with tears, lugubrious songs and plaintive music, and it was customary to visit the tombs of relations, and to leave in them food and drink. if it is worthy of remark that this feast was celebrated among the ancient Peruvians at the same time and on the same day that Christians solemnize their commemoration of the dead —2nd November.” *D*

—————————-

*C* ”The Year of the Pleiades”, by R. G. Haliburton;—from “Life and Work at the Great Pyramid”, by [Charles] Piazzi Smith(sic)[Smyth], vol.ii, pp. 372-373

*D* Ibid, p.388


[Related to this topic, “the Corsicans slaughtered oxen at the grave, giving the meat to their neighbours in honour of the dead. Bread, wine and meat were thus distributed, whilst in modern times bread and wine are served to the poor in this manner on the anniversary of the death of those who can afford to do so, and particularly on the feast of the dead, November 1st.”



CHAPTER XIII IN MEMORIAM - Page 14 - Cemeteries & Crematoria Association. ]

—————————-


Again, speaking of the festival of agriculture and death in Persia, Mr. Haliburton says, “The month of November was formally called in Persia ‘the month of the angel of death.’ In spite of the calendar having been changed, the festival took place at the same time as in Peru;” and he adds that a similar festival of agriculture and death, in the beginning of November, takes place in Ceylon.**(Ibid, p.390)** A like ceremony was held in November among the people of the Tonga islands, with prayers for their deceased relatives.**(Ibid, p.387)**


The Egyptians begin their year at the same time as the Jews, and on the 17th day of their second month commenced their solemn mourning for Osiris, the Lord of the Tombs, **(Ibid, pp.382-391)** who was fabled to have been shut up in the deep for one year like Noah, and whose supposed resurrection and reappearance was celebrated with rejoicing. *E* The death of the god was the great event in Paganism, as we shall explain later, and all the religious rites were made to centre round it.
——————-

*E* [Alexander] Hislop, “[The] Two Babylons,” p.136; Plutarch, “De Iside et Osiride,” vol.ii, p.336 D.
——————-

In Mexico “the festival of the dead was held on the 17th November, and was regulated by the Pleiades. It began at sunset, and at midnight, as that constellation approached the zenith, a human victim, says Prescott, was offered up to avert the dread calamity which they believed impended over the human race. They had a tradition that, at that time, the world had been previously destroyed, and they dreaded that a similar catastrophe at the end of a cycle would annihilate the human race.”
———————-
**Haliburton, from “Life and Work,” vol.ii, p.390**
———————-

In Rome the festival of the dead, or “Feralia,” called “Dii Manes,” or “the day of the spirits of the dead,” commenced on February 17th, the second month of their year. In more ancient times, the “festival of the spirits,” believed to be the souls of deceased friends, was called “Lemuria,” and was held on May 11th. This also was the 17th day of the second month of the year at that time; for the old Latin year commenced April 1st, which month consisted of 36 days, so that May 11th was exactly the 17th day of the second month. **Ibid, p.396, and Hales, “Chronology,” vol.i, p.44**”

This is all I have so far.

If one can be objective about this, laying their bias aside, the force of this evidence alone leads to several conclusions..... one is that Noah (or ?) recorded the date & passed it on to his offspring.


More to come...
It's all very well to cite legends of great floods.

What each claim needs is its own geological evidence.

(One hypothesis for the allegedly widespread legends is the rising of the seas at the end of the last ice age, say around 11,700 years ago. It's not my impression that it has many friends amongst the learned, but I haven't looked into the question.)
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
“Although the continent has relatively few flood legends,[1][2][3][4] African cultures preserving an oral tradition of a flood include the Kwaya, Mbuti, Maasai, Mandin, and Yoruba peoples.[5]
Africa is an entire continent. It has over 3000 tribes. If only five of them have a flood myth, I think its a very good generalization to say that we don't find flood myths in Africa. I said generalization. Generalizations always have exceptions. This one has five exceptions. The other 2995 form the rule.
 
Last edited:

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
@GoodAttention

How has Hebrew scriptures give reason about birthed and bathed in shallower oceans, who was prefect ruler during this time?

How has Ancient Egypt area of land changed from 20,000 years ago? What was flooding 20,000 years ago compared to flooding during Noah and Vaivaswat Manu, 3000 BCE? What were the similarities and differences in these flooding?

Thread: The Flood & Worldwide Festivals of the Dead — the connection.

@GoodAttention what does that mean festivals of the dead?



@GoodAttention @Hockeycowboy

The festival of the dead.
observed by the Peruvians, the Hindus, did these people know Tamil language?
It is amazing, isn’t it?!

Too much of a coincidence, to just be random.

There are quite a few other cultures which celebrate festivals to the dead on or near that day, discovered by Colonel Garnier and also by Haliburton.


It is significant because the Flood, as described in the Bible, would have been the single most catastrophic event extinguishing more human lives proportionately (leaving only eight people) than any other!
It’s not surprising that on or near the date of the Flood (“17th day of the 2nd month”), would arise afterwards all of these festivals honoring those who died.
 
Last edited:

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
It's all very well to cite legends of great floods.

What each claim needs is its own geological evidence.

(One hypothesis for the allegedly widespread legends is the rising of the seas at the end of the last ice age, say around 11,700 years ago. It's not my impression that it has many friends amongst the learned, but I haven't looked into the question.)

At some point the learned need to retire and let the learning review their thinking.
 
Top