The idea of shared flood myths and festivals is the crux of the OP's argument tho.It really is not consequential that there was no record in their history.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The idea of shared flood myths and festivals is the crux of the OP's argument tho.It really is not consequential that there was no record in their history.
Nope -- not a bit.Yes, it is. And the fact that it was written and preserved and passed on to generation after generation shows just that.
Not personally, Shunyadragon here says he is a geologist if I remember correctly.
This is the internet, of course. And who makes sure to let people like me know how he feels about my ideas, calling me uneducated. So maybe in order to understand, do you think I need to go to a university to become a geologist to prove (oops, not prove...but conjecture or conclude based on evidence apparent as thought) that there was no earthwide flood?
I'm curious to see your answer, but moreso your reasoning that there was no earthwide flood. Ever.
Now can you explain in your own words with evidence that there was not an earth-wide flood? Thanks. Remember -- your own words as you understand it with backup evidence of your belief that there was no earthwide flood.
Because there is no scientific evidence for a worldwide flood. And there really should be. Your source was a religious one and not a scientific one. At best they do not understand the concept of evidence. If they do then they were lying.It really is not consequential that there was no record in their history. As I was doing some research about this however, I came across this telling comment:
" The new data should evoke new thinking, which, in this case, would result in the restoration of the belief that the Earth suffered a devastating flood. That geologists have failed to review their fundamental belief in the presence of this new data is powerful testament to the constraining effect that “no flood, ever” holds over science, related disciplines, and rational thought."
The article is interesting, I hope you will read it. Not hard to digest.
Debunking Geology’s ‘No Flood, Ever’ Theory: Historical Analysis & Bathymetry Evidence on New Maps – The Worldwide Flood
So unfortunately geologists still go with the idea that there was "no flood, ever."
There is no evidence that supports a global flood and volumes of evidence that debunk the idea.It really is not consequential that there was no record in their history. As I was doing some research about this however, I came across this telling comment:
" The new data should evoke new thinking, which, in this case, would result in the restoration of the belief that the Earth suffered a devastating flood. That geologists have failed to review their fundamental belief in the presence of this new data is powerful testament to the constraining effect that “no flood, ever” holds over science, related disciplines, and rational thought."
The article is interesting, I hope you will read it. Not hard to digest.
Debunking Geology’s ‘No Flood, Ever’ Theory: Historical Analysis & Bathymetry Evidence on New Maps – The Worldwide Flood
So unfortunately geologists still go with the idea that there was "no flood, ever."
No. We do not have evidence that supports the conclusion that there was a global flood. Claiming that death celebrations by disparate cultures is evidence of the flood has the same validity as claiming they are evidence for _____ (fill in the blank).
We have conspiracy theories now, so probably also back then (still people with imagination and creative minds)I don't think a massive worldwide flood that every other culture recorded would be easily forgotten. It'd be like asking folks to forget the 11th September 2001. The plain truth is, they have no such myth.
....”on the 17th day of the second month”? Genesis 7:11The idea of shared flood myths and festivals is the crux of the OP's argument tho.
Didn't you see my post about the relevant festival? It doesn't even give this date and your source is wrong about the festival.....”on the 17th day of the second month”? Genesis 7:11
That’s the crux.
@HockeycowboyOhhhh, I think I get it now. I didn't read this whole bit before; I must have skimmed.
If I recall rightly, in the famous myth of the Contendings of Horu and Set, Set killed Wesir (Osiris) by tricking Him into a coffin which He then sealed and put afloat in the Nile. It took a year for His wife, Iset (Isis) to find Him.
Edit: Yes, here, [WIki],
Plutarch recounts one version of the Osiris myth in which Set (Osiris' brother), along with the Queen of Ethiopia, conspired with 72 accomplices to plot the assassination of Osiris.[27] Set fooled Osiris into getting into a box, which Set then shut, sealed with lead, and threw into the Nile. Osiris' wife, Isis, searched for his remains until she finally found him embedded in a tamarisk tree trunk, which was holding up the roof of a palace in Byblos on the Phoenician coast. She managed to remove the coffin and retrieve her husband's body.
This conflation with Noach betrays a lack of understanding of Kemetic mythology.
I appreciate that, Rival.I feel as though @Hockeycowboy is being piled on, here. Surely there must be others who can concur with his position? @nPeace @Deeje
Ancient Egypt did not have the same calendar as it does today. (I mean, there was no “August” or “July” in ancient Egypt.)Didn't you see my post about the relevant festival? It doesn't even give this date and your source is wrong about the festival.
One weak, and I mean very weak, coincidence. Not only that the Jewish calendar has the months date from an ecclesiastical basis and a civil basis. They appear to mainly use the former and for that calendar you are a half a year off. Worse yet it is very weak as far as coincidences go. Do you know what else happens at that time of year? Autumn is in full swing in the Northern Hemisphere. We are changing from things growing to dying. Do you think that might be a more reasonable explanation for those dates rather than a mythical flood?It’s not that disparate cultures have a festival of the dead..... that’s not it.
These celebrations of the dead are held worldwide on the same day of different calendars — the 17th day of the 2nd month — the Bible says the Flood occurred!!
Yes, that must be it: I added the tags in an edit! Thanks for that info, Rival.If he edited the tags in afterwards you won't have been notified. It's not a very good system.
One weak, and I mean very weak, coincidence. Not only that the Jewish calendar has the months date from an ecclesiastical basis and a civil basis. They appear to mainly use the former and for that calendar you are a half a year off. Worse yet it is very weak as far as coincidences go. Do you know what else happens at that time of year? Autumn is in full swing in the Northern Hemisphere. We are changing from things growing to dying. Do you think that might be a more reasonable explanation for those dates rather than a mythical flood?
No, since there is a natural explanation for the events that we do see then it is very weak evidence. A natural explanation beats an explanation when the claim is essentially "magic!"Lol!!
In fact, ROFL!!
It is strong evidence! For many things, not the least of which is the Bible’s accuracy about this event!
Imagine, ancient and current cultures far removed from even any knowledge of the Bible, yet on the very same day the Bible says the Flood occurred & killed the majority, they hold celebrations for the dead!! “The 17th day of the second month”.
What’s your next move? Yelling “conspiracy“?
Actually, I saw some merit in your statement,
“We are changing from things growing to dying. Do you think that might be a more reasonable explanation for those dates rather than a mythical flood?”
But then that would be more viable if the date of these feasts fell in mid-winter, with the Sun’s shortest day, usually Dec. 24.
But it doesn’t. So that understanding “holds no water” — pardon the pun.
Huh?!You're citing a historian from a hundred years ago who provides no citations for his claims.
He changed the date and then used a special pleading argument. for Catholic and other examples. Once again, autumn explains it much better and does not require magic.Huh?!
There are quite a few citations! Your bias is blinding you.
Historical facts are historical facts, whether reported by Niall Ferguson or Josephus.
Regarding autumn : these festivals honor dead humans, not death of nature. “On the 17th day of the second month” of their respective calendars.
How sad it is...confronted with factual evidence revealing a commonality — on the very same date, in all parts of the world — but still, your bias won’t let you at least reason on it.No, since there is a natural explanation for the events that we do see then it is very weak evidence. A natural explanation beats an explanation when the claim is essentially "magic!"
And please note, it is not on the same day each month. I cannot be. There are different calendars involved. You found a few that seemed to match that date and ignored all of those that did not. That also makes it very weak evidence.
And of course the actual scientific evidence is infinitely stronger and knocks the claim out of the park. As you yourself have demonstrated many times there is no scientific evidence for the Flood of Noah.
No. They are not all on the same date. That is the claim. It does not appear to be supported. There are some, repeat, some celebrations around that date. You can never claim the same date for Mayans or other such groups because the two different calendar will not give the same date in each year.How sad it is...confronted with factual evidence revealing a commonality — on the very same date, in all parts of the world — but still, your bias won’t let you at least reason on it.
Your statement, “And please note, it is not on the same day each month. I cannot be. There are different calendars involved. ”
But it is, on their respective calendars as these anthropologists and historians stated...ancient calendars no longer are followed, for obvious reasons. Ancient Rome’s celebration was on May 11th, the 17th day of their second month at the time.
(Which actually further debunks your ‘things die in autumn’ argument.)
Combined with all the other evidences I’ve posted, the cumulative weight can not be reasonably dismissed.