djhwoodwerks
Well-Known Member
This is sooo sad in sooo many ways. Have a good day..
Sad, but true. Please name one "same sex" couple in the Bible.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This is sooo sad in sooo many ways. Have a good day..
What's with all the miscarriages and stillbirths then?
I don't know. It sounds like he's trying to paint the fundamentalist as the norm of Christianity. It just reads like pummeling a straw man to me.
Sad, but true. Please name one "same sex" couple in the Bible.
David and Johnathon
A very curious question which makes me wonder what your point is, but how about two of them.Sad, but true. Please name one "same sex" couple in the Bible.
Nice try! That's like assuming Jesus and John.
Thinking a lot about homosexuality lately?
You do realize, don't you, that this makes no sense whatsoever. But whatever.Are you? You made the OP!
It's an article Sunstone offered up for discussion last May :"Dear Offended Christian, From a Very Tired Christian", asking Christians on RF if they agreed with its point of view. Because it's so good and relevant I feel it deserves a wider audience and participation. So click on the link and enjoy. It ain't that long.
Oh yes, please send Sunstone a thank you note for bringing it to our attention.
.
Sad, but true. Please name one "same sex" couple in the Bible.
BTW, just what is the point of your request? Thinking a lot about homosexuality lately?
Are you? You made the OP!
You do realize, don't you, that this makes no sense whatsoever. But whatever.
The following people are often cited as being "same sex" couples
Ruth and Naomi described in Ruth 1.
Not an assumption, clearly stated ...
“When David had finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was bound to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. Saul took him that day and would not let him return to his father’s house. Then Jonathan made a covenant with David, because he loved him as his own soul. Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that he was wearing, and gave it to David, and his armor, and even his sword and his bow and his belt.” (1 Samuel 18:1-4)
“You son of a perverse, rebellious woman! Do I not know that you have chosen [David] the son of Jesse to your own shame and to the shame of your mother’s nakedness? For as long as the son of Jesse lives upon the earth, neither you nor your kingdom shall be established.” (1 Samuel 20:30)
“David rose from beside the stone heap and prostrated himself with his face to the ground. He bowed three times and they kissed each other and wept with each other; David wept the more. Then Jonathan said to David, ‘Go in peace, since both of us have sworn in the name of the Lord, saying, “The Lord shall be between me and you, and between my descendants and your descendants, forever.” ’ He got up and left; and Jonathan went into the city.” (1 Samuel 20:41-42)
“Saul and Jonathan, beloved and lovely!
In life and in death they were not divided;
they were swifter than eagles,
they were stronger than lions.
How the mighty have fallen in the midst of battle!
Jonathan lies slain upon your high places.
I am distressed for you my brother Jonathan;
Greatly beloved were you to me;
your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.”
(2 Samuel 1:23, 26-27, emphasis added)
If your computer, thanks to a glitch, loses all of your information and sends your ID info to criminals, wouldn't you think the IT department that created said computer should help out?Why do you hold God accountable for them?
If the snuggling fits...Nice try! That's like assuming Jesus and John.
Ah, but just because two men love each other more than any wives noted to the extent that one goes completely bonkers if the boyfriend dies but cares nothing for the mounds of vaginas he has back home and just because they get naked together and just because ... anyway, of COURSE they're hetero!Not an assumption, clearly stated ...
And you know nothing of the science behind the matter. If it's a choice, choose to have sex with a guy and like it. No? Then I guess you didn't choose to be straight, huh?And look closely here - this homosexual issue - NOT ABOUT GENETICS - not at all - nobody is born a homosexual - they LEARN it - it is wholly and purely a RESPONSE to SOCIETY
What is a natural act of love and how does that differ from "pleasure"? And if you're not getting any pleasure ... that's really not our problem now, is it?The thing is here - mortal life is confusing us - we need to seperate NATURAL ACTS OF LOVE - from acts of SEXUAL PLEASURE.....There is a HUGE huge difference...
In other words, if you think too much about having sex with men, you might discover you're actually gay, which is what happens to most homophobes, per science.BUT - if I identify with the act too closely - I will forget my Self and adopt that lesser perspective of Self entirely
First rule of being in the closet (or so I imagine): tell lots of stories of opposite sex conquests to distract from the fact you loved the prince instead.I guess David was a bisexual then. Did he have a secret love affair with Johnathan?
That your "argument" is contingent upon the version of the Bible you prefer, it is rather difficult to take seriously.Romans 1:24-27 (ESV Strong's) 24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Being a Christian, in my own personal opinion, I don't believe that a person born male or female can say, "I'm a man born in a women's body" or vice versa. To say that is to say that God makes mistakes, He doesn't.
I believe that if same sex relationships or marriages were "OK" with God, He would have worded the following differently,
Ephesians 5:31-33 (ESV Strong's) 31 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32 This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. 33 However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that "she" respects her husband.
If same sex relationships were "OK" with God, wouldn't He have said, "hold fast to your partner"?
And you know nothing of the science behind the matter. If it's a choice, choose to have sex with a guy and like it. No? Then I guess you didn't choose to be straight, huh?
What is a natural act of love and how does that differ from "pleasure"? And if you're not getting any pleasure ... that's really not our problem now, is it?
In other words, if you think too much about having sex with men, you might discover you're actually gay, which is what happens to most homophobes, per science.
In as much as you choose to continue this how about first answering my question before going any further.Why doesn't it make sense "to you"? It was "you" who searched the internet and found the "discussion" of someone voicing his opinion on Christians and the "LGBT" community. What were you looking for or thinking about when you found that? Homosexuality?
Apparently you haven't read Ruth 1, nothing suggests they were a "same sex" (LGBT) couple.
Ruth 1:22 (ESV Strong's) 22 So Naomi returned, and Ruth the Moabite her daughter-in-law with her, who returned from the country of Moab. And they came to Bethlehem at the beginning of barley harvest.
Ruth 2:2 (ESV Strong's) 2 And Ruth the Moabite said to Naomi, “Let me go to the field and glean among the ears of grain after him in whose sight I shall find favor.” And she said to her, “Go, my daughter.”
Ruth 3:1 (ESV Strong's) 1 Then Naomi her mother-in-law said to her, “My daughter, should I not seek rest for you, that it may be well with you?
Sad, but true. Please name one "same sex" couple in the Bible.
The relevant verses in Ruth 1 are.
15 Naomi said, “Look, your sister-in-law has gone back to her own people and her own gods. You should do the same.”
16 But Ruth said, “Don’t force me to leave you! Don’t force me to go back to my own people. Let me go with you. Wherever you go, I will go. Wherever you sleep, I will sleep. Your people will be my people. Your God will be my God. 17 Where you die, I will die, and that is where I will be buried. I ask the Lord to punish me if I don’t keep this promise: Only death will separate us.”
I expect reasonable answers to questions 1 and 2 before continuing. Don't have them: don't bother to reply. (I'll assume a lack of answers to be an admission ignorance: you don't know why you do some of the stuff you do.)