Catholicus
Active Member
Another conclusion so circular it bites you in the butt.
No - it isn't circular, but linear.
Except in the opinion of those who want everything to be futile and go round in circles, like their own minds.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Another conclusion so circular it bites you in the butt.
And on the human soul standing before Him.
A biologically independent human individual is one that is not biologically dependent upon another biological entity in order to get oxygen, blood flow, and nutrients into its system. An entity that is biologically dependent upon another cannot be considered an individual.
Indeed. If God turns out to hate Catholics, you are truly up a creek.
I've been told claims. Claims are not evidence.
As God - when on earth in the person of Jesus Christ - founded the Catholic Church, that's toot.
The reason atheism is not examined, criticized, ridiculed & psychoanalyzed as much as theism is there's nothing to criticize. Atheism is one thing: A lack of belief in God. Atheism is NOT the denial of God's existence which you seem to be assuming.
Since atheism is just not having something it's very hard to criticize something that is not there. Not having something is NOT something. So you can't say much about it.
I hope my comment clarifies it for you. However, choosing to have a belief in the Old Testament God without any evidence or proof requires faith. A choice is not a decision based on reasons. Since most atheists seem refuse to accept the idea of choosing something to be true without any evidence both sides are at an impasse. One side if foolish for thinking the other should make choices in faith that seem obvious. And the other side if foolish for thinking someone would ever change their choice because there's no evidence. Many people choose to believe in God precisely because there is no existing "good" evidence to provide them comfort with their own difficult existential questions.
As God - when on earth in the person of Jesus Christ - founded the Catholic Church, that's toot.
And why hate Catholics ? It's bigots - unbelievers, mainly - who hate.
You are indoctrinated.
I'm not promoting abortion, it is a choice of last resort, but giving birth can ruin a woman's life.
Do you believe in free health care, free schooling, payment for stay at home mothers, Planned Parenthood, free contraception, sex education in all schools, etc,. etc., ??
Who told you that? The Catholic Church?
They are evidence.
How do you know Julius Caesar existed ? - only because you've read claims that he did.
Jesus would have had to be off his head if he created the very flawed RCC!
No Jesus Christ, in Matthew's Gospel.
No - it isn't circular, but linear.
Except in the opinion of those who want everything to be futile and go round in circles, like their own minds.
Bull. The historical evidence for Julius Caesar aren't contained in propaganda hahiographies full of completely implausible mythology about him on nearly every page.
Why must there be a first cause?
If there has to be, why invent god?
Circular by definition, because your conclusion is determined by your assumption.
And Matthew's Gospel should be believed because...?
So also can abortion ruin a woman's life.
I believe in free education and healthcare and support for stay-at-home mothers.
Here in the UK, religion is less politicised and polarised than in the USA.
It's biochemistry not God. Our entire composition is a community of cells comprised of atoms. We already know how we come about without a great degree of conjecture and speculation.
If any type of God is involved, it would be nice to know exactly where this supposed interaction takes place .