They were simply anticipating future "Don't Say Ra" laws.Did you forget to attend high school? I took geology at college but Raquel Welch in a fur bikini never got mentioned.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They were simply anticipating future "Don't Say Ra" laws.Did you forget to attend high school? I took geology at college but Raquel Welch in a fur bikini never got mentioned.
nothing more than avoiding the issues...Highly intelligent responses to @SavedByTheLord consist of Not Worth Responding To, No you are wrong, Logic Fail etc. That is from those of us whose grey matter suffered through his spam attacks. To say that he presented evidence is false, he only made assertions and then declared them "proof"
I do not think that you understand what counts as evidence and why. Saved has not presented any evidence. I can support this with reliable sources if you wish, but to even have evidence in the sciences you need to have at bare minimum a scientific hypothesis first:nothing more than avoiding the issues...
I do not agree with everything Saved by the Lord writes here, however, he has presented some evidence above that is referenced and therefore, in order to refute that evidence, referenced responses must be posted...otherwise the answer to his statements are pretty pictures of scantly clad women on a religious forum!
No but she was behind the sweatshirt behind the teachers desk in my 7th grade English class.Did you forget to attend high school? I took geology at college but Raquel Welch in a fur bikini never got mentioned.
View attachment 87920
ArchaeopteryxYes, There are other problems with evolution too that the proponents refuse to acknowledge and instead form utterly horrible unscientific beliefs for. Some problems with evolution:
1. There are no transitional forms universally accepted by evolutionists and doubters in the fossil record.
Correct2. Evolution cannot explain the origin of life. And it was never intended to do so. And so it does not refute the existence of God. Don't let any evolutionists tell you otherwise because they're wrong in that case.
Broccoli3. It really does contradict the scientific method of Testability, Replicability, falsifiability etc. Especially macro-evolution. Has anybody ever observed evolution occurring? No.
YOU have not said much.4. Evolution acts like another religion, seriously. Need I say more?
The worst insult religious folk can level4. Evolution acts like another religion, seriously. Need I say more?
Thanks for analyzing some basic points of mine. Your rebuttal?Archaeopteryx
Tiktaalik
Correct
Broccoli
Banana
YOU have not said much.
You have merely parroted the Institute for Creation website.
Yes, that comment may as well apply to you because you haven't said anything worthwhile yet. You might as well have said nothing.The worst insult religious folk can level
at evolution's defenders is effectively....
"You're as dumb as we are!"
Whoosh.Yes, that comment may as well apply to you because you haven't said anything worthwhile yet. You might as well have said nothing.
Here you have merely emphasized the fact that YOU have not presented anything.Thanks for analyzing some basic points of mine. Your rebuttal?
Yes, There are other problems with evolution too that the proponents refuse to acknowledge and instead form utterly horrible unscientific beliefs for. Some problems with evolution:
1. There are no transitional forms universally accepted by evolutionists and doubters in the fossil record.
2. Evolution cannot explain the origin of life. And it was never intended to do so. And so it does not refute the existence of God. Don't let any evolutionists tell you otherwise because they're wrong in that case.
No, this has already been refuted. Why repeat the lies of others? Even worse, why do you repeat the lies of others after being corrected? When you do that you look as if you are lying.3. It really does contradict the scientific method of Testability, Replicability, falsifiability etc. Especially macro-evolution. Has anybody ever observed evolution occurring? No.
That is another false claim. Evolution is evidence based. Religions are faith based. In other words evolution is based upon reality. Religions are all too often based on wishful thinking.4. Evolution acts like another religion, seriously. Need I say more?
We already know I'm as dumb as you areYes, that comment may as well apply to you because you haven't said anything worthwhile yet. You might as well have said nothing.
What's the point of all this?Yes, There are other problems with evolution too that the proponents refuse to acknowledge and instead form utterly horrible unscientific beliefs for. Some problems with evolution:
1. There are no transitional forms universally accepted by evolutionists and doubters in the fossil record.
2. Evolution cannot explain the origin of life. And it was never intended to do so. And so it does not refute the existence of God. Don't let any evolutionists tell you otherwise because they're wrong in that case.
3. It really does contradict the scientific method of Testability, Replicability, falsifiability etc. Especially macro-evolution. Has anybody ever observed evolution occurring? No.
4. Evolution acts like another religion, seriously. Need I say more?