The Four Dirty Secrets Against Darwin Evolution

[TrueBeliever37]

What evidence have you used to show anything you claimed? Why is the fossil record that exists now insufficient as evidence demonstrating evolution?

Do you need evidence other than from nature that an egg always hatches into the same type animal that laid it? Whether it's a bird or a snake or a chicken or whatever.

Do you need evidence that something has to lay the egg?

Do you need evidence that the egg will always hatch into the type animal that laid it?

Isn't nature enough evidence for you, to prove what I claimed?

 

[TrueBeliever37]

I've asked about that claim too. Still no answer.

That's another falsehood. MY answer was that it would provide some real evidence.

 

[TrueBeliever37]

The fossil record we have is excellent evidence as it stands, surely? All one has to do is join the dots.

So we have a fossil record for the evolution of the giraffe for instance? Can you point me to any kind of link for that?

 

[TrueBeliever37]

That assumes an awareness and understanding of the fossil record that has not been demonstrated by those rejecting out of hand or because they were told to.

Or a gullibility on the part of those who believe anything presented to them as being factual.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Do you need evidence other than from nature that an egg always hatches into the same type animal that laid it? Whether it's a bird or a snake or a chicken or whatever.

No one has claimed that an egg laid by a bird does not hatch into a bird no more than anyone is claiming that an English speaking child will be born speaking French.

It is you that are required to explain how this observation refutes evolution given that you are looking at a specific example in space and time and ignoring all the other evidence.

Do you need evidence that something has to lay the egg?

I need evidence that would support the attitude I see reflected in this question. So far...NOTHING.

Do you need evidence that the egg will always hatch into the type animal that laid it?

Again, why do I need evidence for something that is not a point of rejection, denial or stemming from a claim made. I just see pandering to diversion now with assumed superiority.

Isn't nature enough evidence for you to prove what I claimed?

If there is enough evidence to support you then why do you go through all of this to avoid presenting it?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

That's another falsehood. MY answer was that it would provide some real evidence.

It is a fact.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

So we have a fossil record for the evolution of the giraffe for instance? Can you point me to any kind of link for that?

Can you explain how this is my responsibility and supports your claims? I didn't come on here telling everyone how a chicken laying an egg refutes the theory of evolution. YOU did that.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Or a gullibility on the part of those who believe anything presented to them as being factual.

Projection as I see it. Show me wrong.

 

[TrueBeliever37]

No one has claimed that an egg laid by a bird does not hatch into a bird no more than anyone is claiming that an English speaking child will be born speaking French.

It is you that are required to explain how this observation refutes evolution given that you are looking at a specific example in space and time and ignoring all the other evidence.

I need evidence that would support the attitude I see reflected in this question. So far...NOTHING.

Again, why do I need evidence for something that is not a point of rejection, denial or stemming from a claim made. I just see pandering to diversion now with assumed superiority.

If there is enough evidence to support you then why do you go through all of this to avoid presenting it?

You are essentially claiming an egg laid by a bird doesn't always hatch into a bird, when you claim the egg existed before a bird did.

I AM presenting it. I'm using nature as my evidence to support my claim. My claim: you have to have an animal to lay the egg before you can get another animal from the egg. Nature supports my claim.

YOUR claim from evolution - The egg was first. So once again - what laid that egg?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Or a gullibility on the part of those who believe anything presented to them as being factual.

So far, all I have seen is a the same approach that is often used to support creationism. Claims are made. Every effort is made to avoid supporting those claims and answering questions about those claims. All attempts are made to switch the burden of proof and divert from supporting the claims of creationism. Allusions to superior knowledge, greater spiritual understanding and supreme, excellent, unassailable faith. Then it comes down to insults.

This all seems pretty standard to me. I've seen it before.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I AM presenting it. I'm using nature as my evidence to support my claim. My claim: you have to have an animal to lay the egg before you can get another animal from the egg. Nature supports my claim.

YOUR claim from evolution - The egg was first. So once again - what laid that egg?

You are just making claims that is not a presentation of support.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

You are essentially claiming an egg laid by a bird doesn't hatch into a bird, when you claim the egg was before the bird.

I AM presenting it. I'm using nature as my evidence to support my claim. My claim: you have to have an animal to lay the egg before you can get another animal from the egg. Nature supports my claim.

YOUR claim from evolution - The egg was first. So once again - what laid that egg?

I believe you have made your point. I accept that you are not going to support your claims. I have doubts that you understand the subject matter well enough to come up with anything more than the tactics recorded in this thread. I find many of your actions are very questionable in light of other claims you have made.

 

[TrueBeliever37]

You are just making claims that is not a presentation of support.

Nature is plenty of support.

 

[YoursTrue]

You gotta be kidding offering that as testimony that creation isn't true but evolution is the answer to life. It's sad and no wonder some people are outta their minds.

 

[TrueBeliever37]

I believe you have made your point. I accept that you are not going to support your claims. I have doubts that you understand the subject matter well enough to come up with anything more than the tactics recorded in this thread. I find many of your actions are very questionable in light of other claims you have made.

I find your claims to be foolishness. I don't blame you for having to run away and divert when you are asked a valid question.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Nature is plenty of support.

Yes. It is. It offers a great deal of evidence that supports that living things evolve.

 

[TrueBeliever37]

Yes. It is. It offers a great deal of evidence that supports that living things evolve.

They do evolve but not from a monkey into a man. How foolish.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I find your claims to be foolishness. I don't blame you for having to run away and divert when you are asked a valid question.

My claims were questions put to you and you are the one not answering them.

More of the attempts to insult, but not answer questions. I appreciate the continued evidence that you are not going to answer, but I believe that has been previously and sufficiently established.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

They do evolve but not from a monkey into a man. How foolish.

You'll have to show how you have that complete and absolute knowledge to make such accusations and claims. But I'm not expecting it.

 

[YoursTrue]

Do you need evidence other than from nature that an egg always hatches into the same type animal that laid it? Whether it's a bird or a snake or a chicken or whatever.

Do you need evidence that something has to lay the egg?

Do you need evidence that the egg will always hatch into the type animal that laid it?

Isn't nature enough evidence for you, to prove what I claimed?

Actually, I'd like to see the evidence that evolutionists here proclaim in answer to the above questions...