The Good in Bad Science

[nPeace]

Do you have a point?

Just 4:24 - 4:28. Nothing related to the OP. It was meant for a particular poster, but it can be useful to others.

The video in its entirety might relate to the OP though. I suppose it could go with the post before it. Feel free, if you like, to make a point. I didn't have anything new from my previous two posts.

 

[Milton Platt]

On these forums, the usual claim of most Atheist and believers in scientific myths and fairytale stories, is that the reason people don't believe those cosmology and evolution stories, is because of a religious agenda. However, the evidence says otherwise.

The truth is, people who do not suppress common sense, for a belief system, reject what is obviously bad science, or actually, no science at all.
Hence, many Atheists, and Agnostics are coming to a different view thanks to bad science.

For evidence of this, one just needs to do a simple search on "former Atheist", or "Atheist who became".
The number of Atheist who, in the last century, came to believe in a designer - God, is enormous.

So, there is actually good in bad science.
In everything bad, there is always some good, apparently.

What is a "scientific myth"? LOL

 

[nPeace]

What is a "scientific myth"? LOL

Good one.
Google is your friend... but be cautious.
Scientific myth. We are always learning new stuff, huh.

 

[Milton Platt]

Good one.
Google is your friend... but be cautious.
Scientific myth. We are always learning new stuff, huh.

Ah, thank you for the link. Myths that purport to have a scientific basis but in fact do not.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Just 4:24 - 4:28. Nothing related to the OP. It was meant for a particular poster, but it can be useful to others.

The video in its entirety might relate to the OP though. I suppose it could go with the post before it. Feel free, if you like, to make a point. I didn't have anything new from my previous two posts.

I think that you are grasping at straws again. Yes, some ideas in physics are still a bit unsettled. We can tell how old the universe is roughly but it gets a bit tricky to extrapolate all the way to the Big Bang. They were not really doubting the Big Bang, they were discussing its cause more than anything else.

 

[nPeace]

I think that you are grasping at straws again. Yes, some ideas in physics are still a bit unsettled. We can tell how old the universe is roughly but it gets a bit tricky to extrapolate all the way to the Big Bang. They were not really doubting the Big Bang, they were discussing its cause more than anything else.

Yes. Not quite the same as the material here.

 

[gnostic]

Creation Science (or just simply Creationism) and Intelligent Design are not even “bad science”. They are both pseudoscience.

They are religious beliefs masquerading as “science”, hence creationism and ID are pseudoscience.