• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Government have tried to groom a new politician to reflect America's changing demographics.

Sounds quite likely. It would be extremely difficult to find a second person to reflect America's changing demographics.
But why should they try to recruit a low-skilled migrant from a foreign country if there are probably thousands of US Citizens of the same background, who are much better qualified?

Best point over there and say "Look behind you! Jesus!". This will almost certainly enable you to achieve all your nefarious goals.
Sorry, but I'm not with you. Perhaps, you could rephrase that please?
 
Last edited:

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
The subject title should read like this, "Is it true that the Obama administration have tried to groom a new politician to reflect America's changing demographics?"

Is it true that the Obama administration have tried to groom a new politician to reflect America's changing demographics; but at the same time, the Government had to concoct a fictitious story about the "Second Coming of Christ", as the person whom they have tried to recruit was reluctant to go according to the Government's plan?

So then, is it true that the "End Times Christ" is fake, and the "Second Coming of Christ" was nothing but a fiction concocted by politicians and Christians on both sides of the Atlantic to ENTICE the target to be recruited into US politics?

Is the "Second Coming of Christ" nothing more than enticement by the Government in its attempt to recruit the target into US politics?

Was such a plan simply the initiative of President Obama and his political entourage in the White House; or does it reflect the initiative of the wider political establishment in Washington DC?

But why should they even try to recruit a low-skilled migrant from a foreign country if there are probably thousands of US Citizens of the same background, who are much better qualified?
Normally accompanying the OP is a link so we can see where you're getting your information from, so please provide that.
 
I've answered the question. Now, how about you tell us why you think this, or tell us why you don't?
Because I usually get a prompt reply to most questions I have posted onto Yahoo answers; but if it doesn't happen then there's usually a definitive reason behind it - although such reason(s) may not be broadcasted.

RF Forum is basically just a contingency - or back up - in case I don't receive any further answers on Y/A.

Y/A is the main channel that I use, not the RF Forum - which is rather more restricted as you can well appreciate.
 

McBell

Unbound
But how do you know that the Illuminati exist?

Adam Weishaupt was spotted recently in New Orleans.
He has had extensive plastic surgery, he does it himself you know, so though he is seen all the time, most people have no idea it is him.


But What evidence is there to say that they exist?
Proof.jpg

the owl is all the proof we need....
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Adam Weishaupt was spotted recently in New Orleans.
He has had extensive plastic surgery, he does it himself you know, so though he is seen all the time, most people have no idea it is him.



View attachment 12970
the owl is all the proof we need....

Exactly. They practice sacred geometry atop ley lines. And with it being in the heart of the capital, they can easily manipulate the body politic with their masonic magick.
 
Reevaluate your faith and read Revelations.
Wrong. Because if Jesus is real, you can't call him the "Anti-Christ" - which would be tantamount to Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit would occur if you said that the Spirit is "unclean" as in Mark 3:30.

Any false accusations which are similar to Mark 3:30 would be tantamount - or de facto the same as - to such a Blasphemy.

So are you serious about the so called "Anti-Christ"?

Edit: Besides this, God or Christ would only be "Anti-Christ" according to your Eurocentric - and ethnocentric - view of WHO God is. But don't expect the "End Times Christ" to be like "Santa Claus" to give everybody a big hug/kiss when he finally returns. Because God isn't necessarily "all loving, all benevolent, and all merciful" if you read the Bible carefully, and come to terms with the fact that God is more than just your own SELECTIVE account of his character/nature, according to your own SELECTIVE interpretation of the Bible. Aside from being "Santa Claus" God is also called "Jealous, wrathful, and vengeful", according to Nahum 1:2; Deuteronomy 6:15, 32:35; Psalm 94:1; and Romans 12:19. Otherwise, the final judgement could never take place if God is ONLY "Santa Claus", but without the slightest inkling to judge his creation. Clearly, this is NONSENSE; and we must therefore assume a more measured, holistic, and balanced view of WHO God is to know exactly WHOM we pray to, and WHAT we are dealing with. So therefore, it is good academic practice to consider ALL the evidence available to acknowledge EVERY aspect of God according to the Bible; but it's not good academic practice at all to restrict oneself to a SELECTIVE account of WHO God is according to your own SELECTIVE interpretation of the Bible. Therefore, God is the "Absolute", according to Hegel's dialectical process - as the historical process is in essence a spiritual one.
 
Last edited:

4consideration

*
Premium Member
Wrong. Because if Jesus is real you can't call him the "Anti-Christ", which would be tantamount to Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit would occur if you said that the Spirit is "unclean" as in Mark 3:30.

Any false accusations which are similar to Mark 3:30 would be tantamount - or de facto the same as - to such a Blasphemy.

So are you serious about the so called "Anti-Christ"?
I don't think it's fair that you didn't tell him you were The Christ, and then be angry with him for not knowing it would anger you. How was he supposed to know?
 
I don't think it's fair that you didn't tell him you were The Christ, and then be angry with him for not knowing it would anger you. How was he supposed to know?
But I only know what I have been told. I don't presume to know anything beyond feedback I get from other people.

Clinical psychologists call it "reality testing" or empiricism. Some religions call it "spiritual science".
 

4consideration

*
Premium Member
But I only know what I have been told. I don't presume to know anything beyond feedback I get from other people.
Really? I find that difficult to believe. Who told you about this matter, the whole subject of this thread?

You asked some questions in the OP, and gave no reference, so as far as I'm concerned, you are the only person in the world that thinks the subject of the OP to be anything to even discuss.
 
Last edited:

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Really? I find that difficult to believe. Who told you about this matter, the whole subject of this thread?

You asked some questions in the OP, and gave no reference, so as far as I'm concerned, you are the only person in the world that thinks the subject of the OP to be anything to even discuss.
Plus no link(s), so it's hard to take seriously.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Wrong. Because if Jesus is real, you can't call him the "Anti-Christ" - which would be tantamount to Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit would occur if you said that the Spirit is "unclean" as in Mark 3:30.

Any false accusations which are similar to Mark 3:30 would be tantamount - or de facto the same as - to such a Blasphemy.

So are you serious about the so called "Anti-Christ"?

Edit: Besides this, God or Christ would only be "Anti-Christ" according to your Eurocentric - and ethnocentric - view of WHO God is. But don't expect the "End Times Christ" to be like "Santa Claus" to give everybody a big hug/kiss when he finally returns. Because God isn't necessarily "all loving, all benevolent, and all merciful" if you read the Bible carefully, and come to terms with the fact that God is more than just your own SELECTIVE account of his character/nature, according to your own SELECTIVE interpretation of the Bible. Aside from being "Santa Claus" God is also called "Jealous, wrathful, and vengeful", according to Nahum 1:2; Deuteronomy 6:15, 32:35; Psalm 94:1; and Romans 12:19. Otherwise, the final judgement could never take place if God is ONLY "Santa Claus", but without the slightest inkling to judge his creation. Clearly, this is NONSENSE; and we must therefore assume a more measured, holistic, and balanced view of WHO God is to know exactly WHOM we pray to, and WHAT we are dealing with. So therefore, it is good academic practice to consider ALL the evidence available to acknowledge EVERY aspect of God according to the Bible; but it's not good academic practice at all to restrict oneself to a SELECTIVE account of WHO God is according to your own SELECTIVE interpretation of the Bible. Therefore, God is the "Absolute", according to Hegel's dialectical process - as the historical process is in essence a spiritual one.

For one, the cloned Christ (with the DNA from the shroud of Torin) is the antichrist, as clearly stated in the bible (The bible is actually code, which is easily decoded by those whose hearts are of true faith.) And of course God is "Eurocentric" considering that his Church arose and resided in Europe.
 
Top