The principle I am advocating helps people to realize they should not make any assumptions.You seem to have some issue with our current prophet, and are therefore assuming things about what others are and are not asking for, and in how they are asking to justify to yourself why so many people are having Spiritual confirmations about someone you personally disagree with.
If you ask God to give you a witness that Thomas S. Monson is His Lord's Anointed, embedded within that request is the assumption that he is such.
If he is such and you ask for God to give you a witness if and only if he is such, you will get a witness.
If he is not such and you ask for God to give you a witness if and only if he is such, you will not get a witness.
Which is the manner of asking for a witness that will not endanger yourself?
And, when you ask, you truly need to be open to the possibility that he isn't.
If you are able to do this, and the witness comes, then your witness is sure.
Otherwise, you could be getting a false witness based on a desire to just fit in.
And I believe it was of God and that you are where you should be.Like I said, I am a convert - just FYI, I did not ask, or want, the spiritual experience I was given. I went to the LDS church in order to fulfill an assignment for a college class, not to join any church... but I ended up joining the church. I repeat, I did not ask to receive a witness, God was not catering to any personal wishes on my part - Mine is more of a Saul/Paul conversion story, or the story of Alma the younger.
I am not trying to tear down anything that is good and of God.
I'm simply touching upon things that many people don't pay much mind to that can lead them into spiritually dangerous territory.
That's a perfect example of what I am talking about.Personally, there have been many things that I have asked for, and received an answer of "no". We do not always get what we ask for. There are false Spirits out there that can lead you astray, but the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Truth, will never lead anyone astray. Asking for things that are amiss will usually just get you the silent treatment - I suppose if you are really stubborn, yes, God will give you what you want, but will give it with a warning (the story of how Joseph lost the manuscripts - he kept asking, even when he knew what the answer was - he bugged God until he got what he wanted, but after the first two answers, I think he knew his request was amiss...)
People can bug God about things and in so doing harm themselves.
Leaders in offices of authority can also bring harm in the same manner.
This is why the body of members has the right and responsibility to sustain or object.
The scriptures make it clear that a person can do all kinds of good and perform many mighty miracles in the Lord's name and yet in the end be called to the carpet for their iniquities and be told to depart.In any event, I have faith that the LDS church - though it is made of imperfect people - is being led by God. I feel the spirit with our local leaders, and I feel the spirit during general conference. Hinckley was a prophet of temples, Monson is a prophet of taking care of the poor. I think the current direction the church is heading is inspired and matches the needs of what is happening in the world today.
The understanding I have is that we must be careful at all times to perform our duty to sustain or object, as we are guided by the Holy Spirit. This means to me that at some point when you feel you are ready, and anyone who holds the Melchizedek Priesthood should be, to be willing to look underneath what could just be a sheep's cloak. If you are unwilling to look for such, then you shall never have eyes to see such.