Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
Well facts are interesting. We can observe (experience) and we can't create narrative to our observations and then our created narratives become the reality of what we are observing(experiencing). Theology over time stumbled into stupidity because it was emperical study examination to the bible. Its what originally gives Christianity it's separated self identity we have facts the bible you have fiction not in the bible. We tend to factually approach nature scientifically today in the exact same hyper reductive kind of ways. Not everyone in science just like not everyone in religion falls into this but most do in both domains. In religion we have the new testemt Joseph the religious dogma doctrine rejector. In science one coulf say we have Einstein the scientific dogma doctrine rejected. Which then becomes new dogma in the same way that happens in religion as well. Artists are a curiosity to both domains to say the least.
Your posts are a little difficult to understand.
I am not sure what "scientific dogma" you are referring to, in Einstein's or anyone else's case. I do not know what facts in the bible you are referring to. There are some verifiable facts, to be sure. Some of the political figures, nations, and places do or did exist in fact. Beyond that, what verifiable facts are there?