Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OK, I've heard it way too many times, and I haven't heard a convincing argument yet. So, please bring it on. Where is this "proof" that the Qur'an is the word of God?
Response: In ch: 4:82 of the qur'an we read, "Will they not,then, meditate upon the Qur'an? Had it been from anyone other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy". Also in ch.2:23 we read "And if you are in doubt as to what We have sent down to Our servant, then produce a chapter like it, and call upon your helpers beside Allah, if you are truthful".
Here we have two tests. Once applied, we come to learn that the qur'an is in fact the truthful word of Allah(swt).
Pretty much."Because it says so in the Qur'an"?
the test of patience begins.........
I wish you all the luck in the world, Msizer, but I bet you give up with Fatihah.
Actually Fatihah, I'm quite sure you're wrong about that, but since I can't actually speak for him (even though you seem to think you can) I'll just speak for myself. The Koran is nothing more than a bunch of literature written by a shrewd illiterate business man who hid away in a cave and had delusions about the angel gabriel.
"Because it says so in the Qur'an"? Nice try. Maybe I need to rephrase the question. Can you show me some evidence for this? As for the second part, Emmanuel Kant, David Hume, Peter Singer, Friedrick Nietzche and Thomas Payne have written books far more enlightening than the Koran, so if the Koran is really the word of god, each of those men is smarter than god. Please, do feel welcome to try again though.
Here is the proof:Response: There's the statement. Where's the proof?
Response: You've neither pointed to any error in the qur'an, nor have you produced a chapter like it. So your response alone only shows support that the qur'an is the word of Allah.
Response: In ch: 4:82 of the qur'an we read, "Will they not,then, meditate upon the Qur'an? Had it been from anyone other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy".
Actually, he has pointed to an error: use of circular logic.
"The Qur'an is the Word of God because it says it is the Word of God."
This is an error in logical thinking, because it proves nothing.
As for producing a chapter like it, he has not only done so, but has produced many entire books (through naming their authors) that, for him, far surpass the Qur'an. "Produce a chapter like it" doesn't mean write one yourself.
Response: Actually, he, like yourself, are making the claim of me saying, "The Qur'an is the word of God because it says it's the word of God", when in all actually, you can't quote any of my words which say this. Those are your words. So the illogical is on your part, for using a strawman as your rebuttle. As for producing a chapter like it, saying he did is not "proof" that he's done so.
They are his words, not mine; I am merely commentating on his post. You can see my own argument to the verse you've provided.
He has produced for you many books that for him are not like the Qur'an, for they surpass it. (Again, that's for him. Nietzsche doesn't do much for me... and neither does the Qur'an.)
Response: And again, his "saying" so is not "proof" that it is so.
This same verse can be used for other books that people believe to be from God, and therefore useless in attempting to prove that the Qur'an ALONE is the Word of God.
Much of the time, when one author or "prophet" is involved, there is little to no discrepancy at all in a holy text.
Just like your "saying" they don't is not "proof" that they aren't.Response: And again, his "saying" so is not "proof" that it is so.
using the koran to "prove" the koran is true is circular reasoning.Response: The verse can be used for other books and does not alone prove the qur'an to be the word of Allah(swt). I agree. However, I didn't use just that verse.
Ah, I get it. He says that these books match the Qur'an, but just because he says so, doesn't mean it is so. Such skepticism is good.
Can you test this skepticism and attempt to prove that these books do not surpass the Qur'an?