SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
The lamprey has not evolved for supposedly 350 million years. This also proves evolution and billions of years are false.
How do you explain the lamprey which has not evolved for supposedly 350 million years? During that time, there was supposedly 2 great extinction events at 252 million and 66 million years ago. There was another one supposedly 210 million years ago. Those events were so drastic that even the ocean affected. Also, there was supposedly a large cooling of the oceans about 34 million years ago. With all the competition with other species, all supposedly changing drastically through survival of the fittest, and during the dire fight for survival in these above events, why didn’t the lamprey evolve? This refutes evolution and billions of years also.
Here is a link from evolutionists which show that the lamprey has not changed in all those eons.
A Note on Lampreys | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Here is a link to the vastly changing events that the lamprey would have faced.
One of the worthy opposition objected to this as they strained at a gnat, the word “much” in the article. Yet they have bought the whopper of a lie that man evolved from a sea creature in the same time, and that mankind is the distant cousin of the sea urchin, (swallow a camel), called Uncle Urch. But the article made a big deal that the lamprey had not changed and was the perfection of evolution evolving from a single celled organism in only 250 million years. So, their own scientists called it a lamprey and recognized it as such. BTW, who would buy such a whopper of an explanation for living fossils.
What was interesting about this straining of a gnat is that the person proved that such things as living fossils prove that evolution and billions of years are false, else why the big dance around the obvious. In the movie, “The Verdict”, Paul Newman plays a lawyer who represents a woman who is in a comma from being given anesthesia for surgery even though she had eaten a full meal only 1 hour prior. So, Newman calls the doctor that made this mistake. The doctor had forgot to check the question of the form before giving her the anesthesia. This doctor is an expert in anesthesia. Newman asked the doctor, if a doctor gave someone anesthesia only one hour after eating would that be negligence. The doctor says it would noy only be negligence but criminal. And this person did exactly the same in this case.
How do you explain the lamprey which has not evolved for supposedly 350 million years? During that time, there was supposedly 2 great extinction events at 252 million and 66 million years ago. There was another one supposedly 210 million years ago. Those events were so drastic that even the ocean affected. Also, there was supposedly a large cooling of the oceans about 34 million years ago. With all the competition with other species, all supposedly changing drastically through survival of the fittest, and during the dire fight for survival in these above events, why didn’t the lamprey evolve? This refutes evolution and billions of years also.
Here is a link from evolutionists which show that the lamprey has not changed in all those eons.
A Note on Lampreys | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Here is a link to the vastly changing events that the lamprey would have faced.
Ocean Through Time
ocean.si.edu
One of the worthy opposition objected to this as they strained at a gnat, the word “much” in the article. Yet they have bought the whopper of a lie that man evolved from a sea creature in the same time, and that mankind is the distant cousin of the sea urchin, (swallow a camel), called Uncle Urch. But the article made a big deal that the lamprey had not changed and was the perfection of evolution evolving from a single celled organism in only 250 million years. So, their own scientists called it a lamprey and recognized it as such. BTW, who would buy such a whopper of an explanation for living fossils.
What was interesting about this straining of a gnat is that the person proved that such things as living fossils prove that evolution and billions of years are false, else why the big dance around the obvious. In the movie, “The Verdict”, Paul Newman plays a lawyer who represents a woman who is in a comma from being given anesthesia for surgery even though she had eaten a full meal only 1 hour prior. So, Newman calls the doctor that made this mistake. The doctor had forgot to check the question of the form before giving her the anesthesia. This doctor is an expert in anesthesia. Newman asked the doctor, if a doctor gave someone anesthesia only one hour after eating would that be negligence. The doctor says it would noy only be negligence but criminal. And this person did exactly the same in this case.