The conversation has moved on so far from that stopover that your loss is exquisite.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The conversation has moved on so far from that stopover that your loss is exquisite.
I suppose justifications for losing count as winning on this thread.With extended justifications like that, who needs winning?
I prefer to simpler approach: post = win.
Its temporary or permanent nature is a fluke of nature, but it is there to be had whenever one wants to claim it...
Kinda like breathing, which allows one to keep winning.
No justification...it's a win!I suppose justifications for losing count as winning on this thread.
If you really deserved to win, your moniker would be "Win Wei".
But "Wu" means "loser" in the language.
.
So "Revoltingest" is the winningest moniker.
and is again...
Duh!It what language might that be
"Revolting" is synonymous with "winning".Actually it means "most revolting" and has nothing to do with winning...that is if you are talking any REAL language and not some made up language that only you know
No, & @Draka agrees with me.yes, and again you lose...and again I win