The last post is the WINNER!

[sun rise]

You're arguing that intuition is only real
when it turns out correct. It reminds me
of those who claim that all Christians are
good....the bad ones aren't real Christians.

I see. You don't care about scientific research because you've made up your mind. Your attitude would be "smoking does not cause cancer because everyone who smokes does not get cancer" and so forth.

 

[Revoltingest]

I see. You don't care about scientific research because you've made up your mind.

Just claiming "scientific" shouldn't inspire unquestioning
faith in the claim....especially when your source is writers
at Bored Panda.
It's also "scientific" to note that memory is selective, & that
memories of close calls avoided by intuition are stronger
than memories of non-events that triggered intuition.
So collecting some anecdotes is meaningless.

Your attitude would be "smoking does not cause cancer because everyone who smokes does not get cancer" and so forth.

So much for your understanding of science.
I'll bet that Deepak Chopra is your favorite scientist.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

View attachment 64839

Yup. But with talent you can make a really good pizza sandwich and garlic toast with that kind of bread.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Discrimination against @Dan From Smithville

What the petrified wood has said is unimportant and we do not hear his words with our magnificent ears that inspire the names of mountains.

 

[Viker]

Yup. But with talent you can make a really good pizza sandwich and garlic toast with that kind of bread.

How fast some of us forget our youth, especially the collidje years.

 

[John53]

We need more homophones

 

[Shadow Wolf]

I win having made chocolate syrup. It lost though as it doesn't give a very chocolatey taste to milk.

 

[ChristineM]

Good night......hope you are less crouchy, tomorrow.....

I am never crouchy. Life is too much fun to he crouchy with it.

 

[ChristineM]

I claim detailed prognostication in some areas.
And less detail in others.
You haven't proven otherwise.

Not have i any intention to prove otherwise. You may prognosticate all you want.

 

[ChristineM]

And it's still morning here, (@Revoltingest prophesied that) so I'm claiming my morning win.

 

[John53]

Not have i any intention to prove otherwise. You may prognosticate all you want.

You encouraged him so you can clean up the mess this time. Last time it was ankle deep.

 

[ChristineM]

You encouraged him so you can clean up the mess this time. Last time it was ankle deep.

'tiz fun to watch though.

From a distance

 

[Stevicus]

Another hump day win.

 

[ChristineM]

Another hump day win.

I'll tell you after physiotherapy;-)

 

[Revoltingest]

Not have i any intention to prove otherwise. You may prognosticate all you want.

I predicted that response.

 

[Revoltingest]

You encouraged him so you can clean up the mess this time. Last time it was ankle deep.

RF is definitely a place where tall boots & flood pants are useful.

 

[Estro Felino]

 

[sun rise]

Just claiming "scientific" shouldn't inspire unquestioning
faith in the claim....especially when your source is writers
at Bored Panda.
It's also "scientific" to note that memory is selective, & that
memories of close calls avoided by intuition are stronger
than memories of non-events that triggered intuition.
So collecting some anecdotes is meaningless.

So much for your understanding of science.
I'll bet that Deepak Chopra is your favorite scientist.

Google Scholar

 

[Wu Wei]

You're just using the no true real intuition fallacy fallacy fallacy.

Well that's a fallacy

 

[Revoltingest]

Google Scholar

I'm impressed that you can post a link to other links.
However, doing that, utterly without any excerpting
or discussion means nothing.