"THE LORD'S DAY IS THE SABBATH DAY NOT SUNDAY ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURES

[Subduction Zone]

So once again you have nothing do you. You do make me smile. I enjoy our conversations though

No, I have plenty. But you have not made any arguments that require anything from me.

Please learn how to present evidence. There is a possibility that you could have some. But mere links are not evidence. Using them the way that you do is merely you admitting that you were wrong again and again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Alright Mr false claims and no evidence who runs away every time I ask you to prove your claims. Lets talk more when you can prove what your saying.

Present your claims properly. You did not give anything that merited a response.

How many times do you need your errors explained to you?

 

[3rdAngel]

No, I have plenty. But you have not made any arguments that require anything from me.Please learn how to present evidence. There is a possibility that you could have some. But mere links are not evidence. Using them the way that you do is merely you admitting that you were wrong again and again.

If you have evidence post it. Saying you have evidence and not posting any is simply you making false claims and accusations that have no truth in them as already proven here (see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked).

 

[3rdAngel]

Present your claims properly. You did not give anything that merited a response. How many times do you need your errors explained to you?

Unlike you I post my evidence to your false claims and accusations (see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked). All you do is run away from the discussion and say you have evidence but never post any when asked. So we will agree to disagree here dear friend

 

[Subduction Zone]

If you have evidence post it. Saying you have evidence and not posting any is simply you making false claims and accusations that have no truth in them as already proven here (see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked).

One more time:

You are merely posting links. That is not evidence. They are claims on your part at best

And you continue to run away from the 1 Peter 3 15 question.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Unlike you I post my evidence to your false claims and accusations (see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked). All you do is run away from the discussion and say you have evidence but never post any when asked. So we will agree to disagree here dear friend

No. Once again, links to your lost arguments are not evidence.

I am pretty sure that you know that is not evidence.

1 Peter 3 15

 

[3rdAngel]

One more time:

You are merely posting links. That is not evidence. They are claims on your part at best

And you continue to run away from the 1 Peter 3 15 question.

The links are to your false claims and accusations and to you running away from the discussion when asked for evidence to prove your claims (see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked) that prove your words are not truthful. You post 1 Peter 3:15 so post me a like where I have not responded to your question? You cannot can you. If you cannot than all you are posting is more false claims and accusations. I am enjoying our conversation. You cannot argue with evidence that disagrees with you, can you dear friend

 

[3rdAngel]

No. Once again, links to your lost arguments are not evidence.

I am pretty sure that you know that is not evidence.

1 Peter 3 15

So you have no link do you and no evidence to your claims and accusations once again do you. I did not think so.

 

[Subduction Zone]

K

The links are to your false claims and accusations and to you running away from the discussion when asked for evidence to prove your claims (see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked) that prove your words are not truthful. You post 1 Peter 3:15 post me a like where I have not responded to your question? You cannot can you. If you cannot than all you are posting is more false claims and accusations. I am enjoying our conversation. You cannot argue with evidence that disagrees with you, can you dear friend

You would have to prove that those claims were false. You never did that.

 

[3rdAngel]

KYou would have to prove that those claims were false. You never did that.

Burden of proof is in you because you were making the false claims and accusations. You have no evidence do you and cannot prove your claims. So your words are not truthful.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So you have no link do you and no evidence to your claims and accusations once again do you. I did not think so.

I am not the one making claims. Except for my claim about running away. And your continued running away from the 1 Peter 3 15 question shows that is not a false claim on my part. I think I have brought it up about ten times tonight.

 

[3rdAngel]

I am not the one making claims. Except for my claim about running away. And your continued running away from the 1 Peter 3 15 question shows that is not a false claim on my part. I think I have brought it up about ten times tonight.

You do make me smile...

you continue to run away from the 1 Peter 3 15 question.

Now prove it. I already asked you to prove this claim and post the links more than once now - You are running away again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Burden of proof is in you because you were making the false claims and accusations. You have no evidence do you and cannot prove your claims. So your words are not truthful.

No, you are the one claiming they are false. Did you respond when they were made? Were any of them about you running away? After all that is all that you did tonight
Once again 1 Peter 3 15.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You do make me smile...

Now prove it. I already asked you to prove this claim and post the links more than once now - You are running away again.

I don't need to. By not answering the question you ran away from the claim.

1 Peter 3 15

 

[3rdAngel]

No, you are the one claiming they are false. Did you respond when they were made? Were any of them about you running away? After all that is all that you did tonight
Once again 1 Peter 3 15.

They are false claims because you have not provided any evidence and refuse to do so. Your running away again. I have asked you for links more than once now. - Silence.

 

[3rdAngel]

I don't need to. By not answering the question you ran away from the claim.

1 Peter 3 15

Prove to me I have not answered the question. I have asked you to prove this claim and post the links. You cannot can you. More false claims and accusations. With you running away from the discussion.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Prove to me I have not answered the question. I have asked you to prove this claim and post the links. You cannot can you. More false claims and accusations.

You can't demand I prove a negative. I can only show our conversation tonight where you continually ran away from it.

1 Peter 3 15

 

[Soapy]

Dude! You keep running away. We never even get to the proof parts.

And how many times have I told you that I will not go over your past losses? That would be a waste of time. You denied it in the past so why do you think that you would not just go into instant denial mode again?

O!! And look! You ran away from the serious part of the discussion that you could not handle again.

Amazing.

You are doing well to be still attempting to debate with a ‘Bot’…

Have you not seen that 3rdAngel is using the flood technique to try to baffle the debate: you cannot win because he will ask you twenty questions and demand answers to all of them. No matter how much time you then devote to answering them it will not be enough because not only are you wasting your time but it means nothing to him what you wrote back: his response will simply be to say that it doesn’t prove anything.

This means he’s got twenty questions he will claim you didn’t answer… and he’ll ask you ten more to keep you off balance. The technique is well known in computer terms as DoS (Denial of Service) which means flooding a computer server with an overwhelming number of requests for service that the server ‘shuts down’ by virtue of not supplying ANY SERVICES at all …
For you, that means that you cannot supply 3rdAngel with the answers he demands from you - and he then claims that you are defaulting on answering him.

I have used an inverse technique on him and the answer is as I suspected: He did not respond with an answer to my question.

I asked him ONE QUESTION - He simply responded again about the swathes of questions he claims he asked me - in fact, he answered with something I didn’t even ask him (There lies the secret to his vulnerability…)

But you FEED HIM by ‘playing by his rules’… He lists and re-lists everything he ever said along with everything you said and thereby elicits massive posts which are overwhelming to read let alone respond to.

What do computer operators do to a DoS: RESET THE SERVERS….

So: RESET the thread debate … and now employ YOUR RULES: No REPEAT questions will be accepted or responded to after a responsible answer is given - Real Debates require this if, for no other reasons than, limit time!

 

[Subduction Zone]

You are doing well to be still attempting to debate with a ‘Bot’…

Have you not seen that 3rdAngel is using the flood technique to try to baffle the debate: you cannot win because he will ask you twenty questions and demand answers to all of them. No matter how much time you then devote to answering them it will not be enough because not only are you wasting your time but it means nothing to him what you wrote back: his response will simply be to say that it doesn’t prove anything.

This means he’s got twenty questions he will claim you didn’t answer… and he’ll ask you ten more to keep you off balance. The technique is well known in computer terms as DoS (Denial of Service) which means flooding a computer server with an overwhelming number of requests for service that the server ‘shuts down’ by virtue of not supplying ANY SERVICES at all …
For you, that means that you cannot supply 3rdAngel with the answers he demands from you - and he then claims that you are defaulting on answering him.

I have used an inverse technique on him and the answer is as I suspected: He did not respond with an answer to my question.

I asked him ONE QUESTION - He simply responded again about the swathes of questions he claims he asked me - in fact, he answered with something I didn’t even ask him (There lies the secret to his vulnerability…)

But you FEED HIM by ‘playing by his rules’… He lists and realists everything he ever said along with everything you said and thereby elicits massive posts which are overwhelming to read let alone respond to.

What do computer operators do to a DoS: RESET THE SERVERS….

So: RESET the thread debate … and now employ YOUR RULES: No REPEAT questions will be accepted or responded to after a responsible answer is given - Real Debates require this if, for no other reasons than, limit time!

He is getting very frustrated because I won't play his game. And his demonstrated continually refusing to answer a single question has shown my claims probably were not false.

Also I told him many times that I would not answer his questions from way back.

 

[3rdAngel]

He is getting very frustrated because I won't play his game. And his demonstrated continually refusing to answer a single question has shown my claims probably were not false.

You do make me smile. Please post me a link and prove your claims where I have not answered your question. You cannot can you. Your running away again after making false claims and accusations your unable to prove as shown in these examples here *see post # 602 linked and post # 642 linked.