samtonga43
Well-Known Member
What things 'seem' like to you often bear no resemblance to how things are. Sorry, but you still miss my point completely.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"THE LORD'S DAY IS THE SABBATH DAY NOT SUNDAY ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURES
- Thread starter 3rdAngel
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You do not appear to have one.
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
You seem to be confused, SZ. The post to which you are responding is to do with projection, not 'running away'.
Have you heard of the tu quoque logical fallacy?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not at all. Were you just slinging vague false accusations again? That is your normal modus operandi.You seem to be confused, SZ. The post to which you are responding is to do with projection, not 'running away'.
Have you heard of the tu quoque logical fallacy?
Ah, I followed his link and I understand your confusion. No, he was running away. It has been explained to him multiple times that links alone are not evidence. He had no excuse. He did that instead of answering questions that he cannot afford to.
Last edited:
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
Ha! But as I say, how things appear to you often bear no resemblance to how things are. Just because you don't get the point doesn't mean it is not there to be 'got'.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Let me correct that then. You had no point. You seem to have quite the difficulty making any.
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
You missed the point. I must remind you again that how things seem to you often bear no resemblance to how things are.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you had no point. You can't make your point. All you have are false accusations.
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
No confusion on my part. The post to which you were responding is to do with projection, not 'running away'.
SZ said: “Sorry, you do not understand what projecting is. Try again”.
Third Angel replied: Well that is not true. Others can also see it even if you cannot (see post # 1006 linked)
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
I made my point. It whooshed right over your head. It is hardly my fault that you are slow on the uptake.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It does not matter what false claims that he makes.. He was still trying to find any excuse that the could not to answer the questions that he refuses to answer. You got taken in by a smoke screen. He knows that I do not play his silly games of posting links without context and claiming that they are "evidence".
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you made a false claim. That was all that you did.
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
Evidence of my 'false claim'?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Soapy is not my acolyte. He is not my follower. Let me ask you think question. Are you 3rdAnglels' acolyte?
And nice attempt to shift the burden of proof. You made a claim that you could not support. You were given quite a few opportunities. Instead you are trying to play the same silly games that 3rd is.
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
Soapy 'follows' you in a certain way. I suggest it may help you to look back to his post just before my description of him as 'acolyte'.
And no, I am not 3rdAnglels' acolyte. We simply agree on your childish method of what you describe as 'debate'.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL! Now there is some massive projection. Since he cannot follow the reasonable rules of debate I have tried to engage him in setting some up. He cooperated at first and then ran away when he would not be able to use his improper methods any more. You do not appear to be any better. When questions are asked of you you do not tend to answer either. You both like to run away.
If you want a debate I am all up for it. There are some of your beliefs that appear to be very questionable. Yet I never see you answering those questions.
Soapy is a literalist, but he can recognize improper debating technique when it is used against him.
Simply referring back to old arguments with links never is "evidence" it only shows that people disagree. Linking is only one small part of a proper debate. One must also quote relevant parts from that link and explain why they are right or wrong. Have you ever seen 3rd do this? I do not remember you ever doing that either.
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
Do you mean my claim that Soapy is your acolyte? If so, I am hoping that you will discern the truth of my claim for yourself. My advice is to get some sleep; it will clear your head.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There you go repeating your false personal attacks with no evidence.Do you mean my claim that Soapy is your acolyte? If so, I am hoping that you will discern the truth of my claim for yourself. My advice is to get some sleep; it will clear your head.
Why am I not surprised?
samtonga43
Well-Known Member
False personal attacks? In my post above? Where?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I don't believe you.