Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Dude! If you insist upon using links instead of logic and valid arguments you need to also quote and explain. Links to old posts without that are just an admission that one is wrong. All that you did was to link to old failed arguments of yours. Your links do not help you when you do that.
Once again, you are the one that runs away. And your inability to understand a response does not mean that one has not been given. I have defended my beliefs. You run away when someone brings up a question that you are afraid to answer.:
Yeah, true. I think I changed the word I was going to use.But why do you assume that I don’t understand that ‘Prayer’ means ‘Request’ /Petition, Soapy?
A lawyer prays to a judge? Really?
You are saying that 3rdAngel is praying to you? Seriously?
Because if you are, I’m afraid it’s you who does not understand scriptural language, Soapy.
(By the way, ‘over- constantly’?
The ‘over’ is superfluous.)
I haven’t seen an explicit question from you for about 20 posts.
If you detail (not links) exactly what you want answered then you are likely to get an answer.
You would need to be able to prove what you say to become believable and you haven't. Let's be honest dear friend. You are deflecting again. Many people in this thread have continued to point out to you that you run away from a discussion by not addressing the post and scripture content that disagrees with you and simply deflect by making false claims and accusations you are unable to prove, then when asked to prove what you say you simply run further away from the discussion because you cannot prove what you claim. Most people in this OP can see this and have also pointed this out to you and have been trying to help you here but it seems you refuse to receive help from anyone. It was amusing in the past but its now become a little boring, so we will agree to disagree. Lets talk more when you would like to have a discussion and have something to contribute to the OP.
Your response here....
The links were provided as evidence that prove why your acolyte's earlier posts were in error and so also show that your acolytes claims that he addressed the content in these posts was not truthful. Perhaps if you disagree you can prove your claims here and show me how your acolyte has addressed the content in the posts that have been linked as evidence to show that he simply ignored them and did not respond to them. If you cannot than your doing the same things you always do and that is to simply make false claims you are unable to prove and then runaway from the discussion when challenged to prove what you say. I already know it is the latter and you will not be able to prove what you say here so you lose again.
As posted earlier, you would need to be able to prove what you say to become believable and you haven't. You will also need to be able to make an argument you can defend without running away. You haven't been able to do that in any of our discussions so far and most people reading this thread can see that.
Please do not pretend you were not asked to address the content in the linked post you ignored that was in disagreement with your earlier posts showing why they were in error. You are just running away from the discussion here. Your deflecting again.
Your response here.
Perhaps it might help if you read and respond to what you are quoting from. You were asked to address the scripture content in the linked posts are are in disagreement with you that prove why your teachings are in error. If you disagree which what is written in the linked posts than show what it is you disagree with from the scriptures share with you and why you disagree (evidence). Ignoring the posts that are shared with you is only running away from the discussion.
In what way did his exegesis fail, SZ?
OK. But you forgot to respond to this...
He bases it on an event that never happened. You should know this.
Oh my! Once again accusing others of what you are guilty of.
But the links did not do that. It was just another post showing your poor debating technique.
You make false assumptions constantly. I shall, from now on, let you know when I see one.
Observations on your fallacious reasoning are not unfounded, and they are not attacks. Man up, SZ!
Don't think so, but I will apologize if you find this discussion.
Well, we’ll find out if I ever ‘lose’, won’t we?
I did ask properly. See above. Still no answers.
In #1312 there are questions you will not, or cannot, answer. There are no false claims there, just facts. There for all to see. Here they are again:
Are you sure that you want to do a Gish Gallop? Refuting one refutes them all.You make false assumptions constantly. I shall, from now on, let you know when I see one.
Observations on your fallacious reasoning are not unfounded, and they are not attacks. Man up, SZ!
Don't think so, but I will apologize if you find this discussion.
Well, we’ll find out if I ever ‘lose’, won’t we?
I did ask properly. See above. Still no answers.
In #1312 there are questions you will not, or cannot, answer. There are no false claims there, just facts. There for all to see. Here they are again:
What value do you find in the Bible?
No Response
You accused me of repeating false personal attacks with no evidence. I responded: “False personal attacks?”
Where?
No Response
I asked: How can anyone have a serious discussion with someone who :-
1 Is unable to provide one shred of evidence for accusative statements he has made.
2 Pretends he is not answering honestly because the person he has accused falsely is not debating honestly!?
3 Runs away because he is afraid to admit that he has no evidence.
No response
Where did 3rdAngel distort what SZ said?
No response
What bogus questions? What false charges? (#1253)
No response
Which of the myths evoke an emotional response in you?
No response
You can't refute facts, SZ
You do not appear to know what facts are.