• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The major difference between creationism and intelligent design

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Do you think there is a difference, or not? If so, what are the differences?
Little knowledge I know, creationism is the belief the universe was created by the divine. The latter is saying our universe is designed well, so only a creator can design it. They go hand in hand.

Thats about it
 

Terese

Mangalam Pundarikakshah
Staff member
Premium Member
I believe Creationism is that the world was created 6000 years ago, and says evolution is fake. Dumb version. Intelligent design is that God created the universe, and all things in it. Maybe slightly less dumber to atheists.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
No difference whatsoever................................. The evidence.
64x64.png

CD%20porponcists_zpsmlx2qw7h.png


source

Then we have the following


Please note the items beginning at 4:24 and 5:51. The last is the missing link between creationism and intelligent design, the "cdesign proponentsists" fossil.


.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I believe Creationism is that the world was created 6000 years ago, and says evolution is fake. Dumb version. Intelligent design is that God created the universe, and all things in it. Maybe slightly less dumber to atheists.
This^

but I do give God credit for ....most intelligent
 

picnic

Active Member
How are these different?
- theist who believes in evolution
- theist who believes in theistic evolution
- theist who believes in intelligent design
(assume the theist believes in a creator god)

I think they are all the same. Jews, Christians, and Muslims cannot claim to believe in evolution. There was no guarantee that humans would evolve or that anything as intelligent as humans would evolve. God can't take credit for creating humans unless he took an active role to ensure that humans (or some equivalent) evolved. Evolution doesn't allow God to be active in the process.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
How are these different?
- theist who believes in evolution
- theist who believes in theistic evolution
- theist who believes in intelligent design
(assume the theist believes in a creator god)

I think they are all the same. Jews, Christians, and Muslims cannot claim to believe in evolution. There was no guarantee that humans would evolve or that anything as intelligent as humans would evolve. God can't take credit for creating humans unless he took an active role to ensure that humans (or some equivalent) evolved. Evolution doesn't allow God to be active in the process.
God can tweak a molecule.....any time He wants to
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Jews, Christians, and Muslims cannot claim to believe in evolution.
Why do people want to tell me what I can or can not believe in??? I have no issues with evolution, creationism (on my terms) and Christianity.

First, find a passage that says "Thou shalt not commit evolution!" First rule of Scuba applies: I won't be holding my breath.
Second, consider baking a cake. The baker mixes all the ingredients, puts it in an oven and watches it evolve into a cake. The cook obviously created the cake using various tools and supplies. Why can't God use evolution?
Third, it's my belief that God created the physical laws that govern us. He simply mixed everything together and has waited patiently.
Fourth, the scriptures claim we were created in God's image. It also suggests that God is spirit. Our similarity is not a physical one: it's spiritual. Like God, we are sentient and so are a few other 'higher orders' of mammals. Anathema? I don't care what others think of me. I rarely have. We tend to be overly exclusive as a species. Look at how people were shaking their heads when Jesus talked to the Samaritan woman. They thought he had lost his mind, for they didn't consider Samaritans to be actually human. God is not blinded by such cultural biases. He is love after all. Those who love have the germ of God within them. His image. My puppy has more God in here than a lot of humans I know. Don't agree with me? Fine. It's my fantasy and I'm quite content in my quest to emulate God's love for others... even my puppy, Fang, aka Fangsta the Gangsta of Love.

10352586_519982678107203_6156943902721016334_n.jpg
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
I hit enter too quickly!

Creationism in America is a political, not a religious question. They use it to try and separate the OKs from the NOKs. Make no doubt about it, it's all about exclusion, bias and bigotry. In other words it's about power and making sure the OKs are in charge. NOK= Not Our Kind

NOK, NOK, who's there?

Not me!
 

picnic

Active Member
God can tweak a molecule.....any time He wants to
This is an interesting issue. How many molecules can God tweak before scientists would feel that the changes to the genome were driven by something other than random mutations, natural selection, etc.?
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I find YEC a much more useful concept. It provides useful information because it is falsifiable. Falsifiable just means that you can gather evidence for or against the concept. ID doesn't have that. Anything could be intelligently designed and whether anything is or not doesn't change anything.

So, if you can find things much older than about 6000 years old you can tell that the Bible was written by primitive people who just didn't know any better. They did not have special access to knowledge unavailable to us. YEC is definitely a useful concept.
Tom
 

picnic

Active Member
...
Second, consider baking a cake. The baker mixes all the ingredients, puts it in an oven and watches it evolve into a cake. The cook obviously created the cake using various tools and supplies. Why can't God use evolution?
Third, it's my belief that God created the physical laws that govern us. He simply mixed everything together and has waited patiently.
Fourth, the scriptures claim we were created in God's image. It also suggests that God is spirit. Our similarity is not a physical one: it's spiritual. Like God, we are sentient and so are a few other 'higher orders' of mammals.
...
With a cake, we mix together the ingredients and know that we are going to get a cake. Not all chocolate cakes are identical, but they are similar. I'm not sure we can say that about evolution. Was intelligent life of some kind inevitable on Earth with the right starting ingredients? Or was it more probable that intelligent life would never exist on Earth?
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
With a cake, we mix together the ingredients and know that we are going to get a cake. Not all chocolate cakes are identical, but they are similar. I'm not sure we can say that about evolution. Was intelligent life of some kind inevitable on Earth with the right starting ingredients? Or was it more probable that intelligent life would never exist on Earth?
It's my opinion that evolution will always result in sentience. If you look at parallel evolution, it's quite amazing how similar animals fill similar niches during their time. Ichthyosaurs were incredibly similar to dolphins and filled the very same ecological niche. OK, so their tails were bent the wrong way, but the similarities are quite eerie. They were quite the draw at the Cromagnum's Sea World. :D :D :D

20_Ichthyosaurier-197-cm-220-x-85-cm-P1030280.jpg
 
Last edited:

DawudTalut

Peace be upon you.
Last edited:

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Intelligent design merges with no science.
It's well established that ID is just a rebranding. See skwim's post.
ID is creationism with glasses and a lab coat.
 
Top