• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Most Crucial Flaws Of Christianity And Atheism

Skwim

Veteran Member
Christians and atheists, what do you see as the most crucial flaw in each other's position?
And don't be shy about it, but

:rose:BE
NICE:rose:
tb08QvV-_400x400.jpg


.
 
Last edited:

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Christians and atheists, what do you see as the most crucial flaw in each others belief system?
And don't be shy about it, but

:rose:BE
NICE:rose:
tb08QvV-_400x400.jpg


.

Flaw in Christianity - Trusting people you have no reason to be trusting.

Flaw in Atheism - Nobody seems to be able to agree on exactly what it is.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Christians and atheists, what do you see as the most crucial flaw in each other's position?
And don't be shy about it, but

:rose:BE
NICE:rose:
tb08QvV-_400x400.jpg


.

Both go off of generalizations of each other reflecting their views of their personal experiences rather than asking each other what they believe without thought of the word christian or atheist being a label of their beliefs and worldviews.

Christian challenges are to ask people what they believe without basing other peoples answers off the bible rather than that other persons criteria of truth.

Another challenge for christians is to see life in another persons shoes and help themselves believe even if they do their beliefs wont be compromised nor weakened when done.

Atheists need to understand not all christians reflect the experiences they may have with christians growing up

Atheists also need to consider that their definition of god is not always the christians definition even though the same word is used

Atheists need to base their arguments on the criteria to which christians hold X is true and not debate the details that come from it. (attack the source not the result)

Atheists may also find it best to look into the christians shoes when discussing scripture

Christians need to understand biblical quoting is not the same as discussion regardless if you want to support your points or use it to debate

As for christianity and atheism, there arent any flaws in both worldviews just how the believers and people tend to express them based on their own bias and experiences.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Atheism: a momentary transitional state which occurs in between religious and political ideas, more of a tunnel than a critter.

Christianity: Practically perfect in every way.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Christians and atheists, what do you see as the most crucial flaw in each other's position?
And don't be shy about it, but

:rose:BE
NICE:rose:
tb08QvV-_400x400.jpg


.

Atheism might be flawed in the sense that it arose out of a rejection of theism. If no one ever heard of God or religion and we were just dealing with life as is, then we would still be atheists - but we wouldn't actually call ourselves that. There wouldn't be any need to call it anything at all. The only reason to identify as "atheist" is because there are those who identify as "theists" (or some variation thereof). If not for that, then we'd just be people.

As for Christianity (or any other religion, for that matter), the main flaw I see is in the expression of absolute certainty of belief. That they are so certain that their beliefs are true is the main problem, and it seems to feed into the reaction of atheists who are convinced that those beliefs are not true.

I actually think both sides can peacefully coexist, especially since no one really knows about the "Great Beyond." The only thing that really matters is whether people are consistent and true to their stated beliefs and principles, whatever they might be.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Most crucial flaw in Christianity is hard to answer. There's enormous diversity in Christian dogma. So perhaps I'll go with 'giving people a reason to abbrogate personal moral responsibility and consideration.'

Atheism is tough, as it doesn't mean much at all, so I think I'll go with 'People (particularly atheists) making too much of it, treating it like a philosophy or badge.'

Prime example was the suggestion by Dawkins of using the term 'Brights'. That is vomit-inducing, insensitive, but (most importantly) inaccurate.
 

Misunderstood

Active Member
I have to agree with Brickjectivity "Christianity: Practically perfect in every way." Except for the sins we commit.

Atheists, just don't give God any credit; because if there was no God they would not exist.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Someone should probably point out that the antithetical to atheism is not Christianity.

The main problem with Christianity is that the religion becomes it's own object of worship. It deifies itself.

The problem with atheism is that it rejects significant positive possibility for no logical reason and for no discernible gain.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
Most crucial flaw in Christianity? The fundamentalists who reject the theism of other faiths.

Most crucial flaw in Atheism? Its fundamental position of rejecting theism.
 
Last edited:

GoodbyeDave

Well-Known Member
Both: lack of evidence.

As St Paul said, the resurection is crucial to Christianity, but nobody saw it happen — all they saw was an empty tomb.

As for atheists, what evidence could you present for the nonexistence of anything? The atheists present even weaker arguments than the Christians: to get personal, look up to Audie's contribution. What does "haha" contribute? It's like a tweet from Trump!
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Both: lack of evidence.

As for atheists, what evidence could you present for the nonexistence of anything?
And that's why the burden of proof always lies with the party making the positive assertion. If you said that winged, polka dot unicorns don't exist, a negative assertion, would you feel you have an obligation or responsibility to "prove" your position?

The atheists present even weaker arguments than the Christians: to get personal, look up to Audie's contribution. What does "haha" contribute? It's like a tweet from Trump!
All the atheist needs to argue is that the theists/deists have failed to "prove" their case.

.
 
Last edited:

Audie

Veteran Member
Both: lack of evidence.

As St Paul said, the resurection is crucial to Christianity, but nobody saw it happen — all they saw was an empty tomb.

As for atheists, what evidence could you present for the nonexistence of anything? The atheists present even weaker arguments than the Christians: to get personal, look up to Audie's contribution. What does "haha" contribute? It's like a tweet from Trump!

Contributes nothing to those who are immune to insight.

Take your notion that there is a one to one equivalency
between the assertion of the existence of somethinhg
despite a 100% lack of one freakin' datum point
in its favour, and, the rather sensible disinclination to
believe in such things.

Like, say, Batboy, the lost continent of Mu, the Invisible
Pyramid, the secret ongoing life of Elvis, and the
efficacy of Alchemy?

It is just as legit to believe, as to not believe?

Surely you are joking.

I supplied the haha.

But you dont get the joke, it being on you.
 
Top