In the XVIII century there was no freedom of speech.I can't say I agree with Voltaire, but I've read that the quote is actually a misquote and a misattribution and that it was Evelyn Beatrice Hall who used the words, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it," to describe Voltaire's attitude about the burning of the book "On the Mind" written by Helvétius. One must therefore ask if the quote is really meant to refer to any and all speech or merely to certain forms of it from certain forms of attack and also ask if it was an exaggeration to say he would "defend to the death" or literally so and if by defend we mean he would argue verbally until his dying breath or take up arms and slay those responsible. As far as I know Voltaire didn't go around killing people. How exactly did Voltaire go about defending the right to say things? Did Voltaire risk life and limb for "On the Mind"? Supposing Voltaire would "defend to the death" against those responsible for burning "On the Mind", would he also defend to the death someone who constantly insulted his mother? I wonder.
People were censored. Kinda like today...
The woke Party wants to censor people like JK Rowling, just because she expressed her own opinion.
Voltaire wouldn't agree with her, but he would defend her right to say it.
The woke Party has normalized doublestandardism.I imagine that if the words are terrible enough I might step aside and say the man who spoke thus has dug his own grave.
There was someone who would post on twitter the times and locations of Elon's movements around the world despite Elon's polite requests that he not do that. And after Elon acquired twitter that account was banned for this activity. It's an interesting question: who would defend such a twitter account? It's not an argument or an opinion. It does nothing of benefit that I can discern. It would be like if I were to spy on my neighbor, make a record of his comings and goings, and then post the information in the local newspaper every day. It's the sort of information one might classify as idle gossip best left to an exchange among friends, but it was being collected and tabulated very publically for the world to see. What say you? Would you "defend to the death" a twitter account from being banned?
What if the President posted on twitter so that people could read what he had to say, would you ban his account?
They consider legitimate to diss Trump 24 / 7....but Rowling talking about womanhood and women who menstruate...that's hate speech.