Ben Masada
Well-Known Member
Mmmmm, nope. Your metaphor was pretty ridiculous.
And your imagination terribly poor.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mmmmm, nope. Your metaphor was pretty ridiculous.
And your imagination terribly poor.
Actually, I'm a fantasy writer, so I'd say my imagination is pretty damn good.
Moses brought forth a law from God which was en-clothed in the Ten Commandments and the instructions that followed. This law is called the law of Moses in Christian circles.
Jesus brought forth another law called the Gospel law. This law is considered to supersede the Mosaic law, so Christians do not feel bound by the Mosaic law but by the Gospel law. Moses and the prophets are good for certain instructions but do not answer questions concerning Christian theology. Paul is considered one of the great instructors of Christianity and henceforth relied upon by Christians. If you want a deeper understanding of Christianity then the writings of Paul are prerequisite reading.
On another note. When Jesus was communicating with the Jewish elders, there was no New Testament or the writings of Paul, there was only Moses and the prophets. Whenever we read of "Moses and the prophets," we may understand that the Christian writers were referring to the then-present scriptures, i.e. Tanakh or Old Testament. See What Bible Did Jesus Use
Who said anything about religious laws? See what your arrogance took you to? With a bite on the tongue for speaking too fast without thinking. The law of cause and effect includes all kinds of behavior, either religious or civic.
There's a problem with your ideas stated here. "cause and effect" are only present in "the law" when there exists an authority to impose the "effect" on you. For instance - let's say you are the last person on Earth. At that point there are absolutely NO consequences to your actions in the civic sense whatsoever - no one there to punish you for anything, regardless how "bad" it would have been considered before you were alone - for instance "stealing" anything and everything you see, ruthlessly hunting the other creatures of the Earth without regulation, setting an entire forest on fire, destroying man-made property, etc. And as even you seem to understand, religious repercussions are only a very slight possibility at best.
So, it would seem to me that we're only tied to the cause and effects of "the law" when there are others around us... which certainly make them far less than absolute. Does "law" exist? Sure. But it's not some immutable/universal truth. Not hardly.
That doesn't sound like cause and effect to me. That sounds like karma, which is a completely different concept.I can't believe you do not understand the law of cause and effect. Cause your finger to touch the fire and you will suffer the effect of that cause. A babe will understand what I am talking about. That's what I mean by cause and effect. Commit a transgression and you will pay for it, if not immediately, somehow later on.
I can't believe you do not understand the law of cause and effect. Cause your finger to touch the fire and you will suffer the effect of that cause. A babe will understand what I am talking about. That's what I mean by cause and effect. Commit a transgression and you will pay for it, if not immediately, somehow later on. Yes, go ahead and set fire in the forest and tell me if you won't somehow have to pay for it. Cross the red light. If you are not caught after the first transgression, you will have much less fear to do it again until you have to pay for it. I think it is enough. You must understand by now what I mean by law of cause and effect. That's the natural law we all all under.
That doesn't sound like cause and effect to me. That sounds like karma, which is a completely different concept.