• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The OT = UGH

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Head of Sodom?

I assume you meant "heard". If you read my posts, you'll see that I've already drawn the connection between Canaan and Sodom/Gomorrah.

I still don't buy it. Nothing justifies genocide.
 

Sleeppy

Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
I assume you meant "heard". If you read my posts, you'll see that I've already drawn the connection between Canaan and Sodom/Gomorrah.

I still don't buy it. Nothing justifies genocide.


We still live with his type of mentality today.. Within, and without Judaism and Christianity.

Separate the good people from the evil people. Kill the evil people, their offspring, and all they ever did. Let the good people take the land they inhabited. Send the good people to heaven, and the evil people to hell.

I'm glad there are some people who realize the difference between an ego and God Almighty.
 

AmbiguousGuy

Well-Known Member
We still live with his type of mentality today.. Within, and without Judaism and Christianity.

Separate the good people from the evil people. Kill the evil people, their offspring, and all they ever did. Let the good people take the land they inhabited. Send the good people to heaven, and the evil people to hell.

I'm glad there are some people who realize the difference between an ego and God Almighty.

What's so weird is that it's just what Hitler did to the Jews -- labeled them evil and in need of destruction -- yet we hear Jewish people defending the same behavior. It's pretty shocking to my ears. One would think Jews of all people would condemn that kind of behavior in no uncertain terms.

Defending genocide. Yikes.
 

Shermana

Heretic
It is also pervasively racist and, as such, thoroughly ignorant.

What are you saying is racist and ignorant, the context of the story? You want to erase it from the Torah and just pretend the Jews inherited Canaan by kindly asking the Canaanites to leave? Or do you want the Torah to read "And so the peace loving Canaanites were brutally slaughtered by the Evil Israelites and their dark god"?

Are you going to call all the Orthodox and Conservative Jews who agree its a literal story and agree with the concept racist and ignorant as well?

Maybe you should be a Marcionite while you're at it.

Perhaps this is an example of why debating the OT with gentiles (and Liberal Jews) who don't quite understand the concept of textual context should be avoided.
 
Last edited:

CMike

Well-Known Member
I assume you meant "heard". If you read my posts, you'll see that I've already drawn the connection between Canaan and Sodom/Gomorrah.

I still don't buy it. Nothing justifies genocide.

It's based on what G-d instructed the Jews.

If you don't want to believe it that's your issue.

If you believe in him take up your beef with him.
 

Shermana

Heretic
It's based on what G-d instructed the Jews.

If you don't want to believe it that's your issue.

If you believe in him take up your beef with him.

The problem is, they want to smear our entire narrative using their modern liberal concepts. Should we just leave them to smear?
 

AmbiguousGuy

Well-Known Member
It's based on what G-d instructed the Jews.

If you don't want to believe it that's your issue.

If you believe in him take up your beef with him.

If your God seems to behave like a monster, perhaps it's time to wonder whether you may be suffering some confusion about Him and His message.
 

CMike

Well-Known Member
If your God seems to behave like a monster, perhaps it's time to wonder whether you may be suffering some confusion about Him and His message.

Perhaps you are simply ignorant and wish to remain that way?

You could try to understand the context but you obviously don't care.
 

Shermana

Heretic
Perhaps we should just wish them well in a life of Canaanite conditions so they can see firsthand how the Canaanites they love so much lived.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
It's based on what G-d instructed the Jews.

If you don't want to believe it that's your issue.

If you believe in him take up your beef with him.

I tend to leave the Gods of other people to themselves. I, for one, don't claim to know if El actually had any hand in any historical event that may or may not have inspired it.

My beef is with the story. If it's literal history, disgusting. But as far as I can tell, that's not likely.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
The problem is, they want to smear our entire narrative using their modern liberal concepts. Should we just leave them to smear?

Not the whole narrative. Just that one book, and only as a story, within the context of that story.

Pretty sure I made that clear.

If you found morally questionable or reprehensible material in Northern European lore, I'd not bat an eye if you criticized it in that context. (Such as Wotan cheating the giants out of the agreed deal, which was reprehensible anyway, in Das Rhinegold.)
 

Shermana

Heretic
I tend to leave the Gods of other people to themselves. I, for one, don't claim to know if El actually had any hand in any historical event that may or may not have inspired it.

My beef is with the story. If it's literal history, disgusting. But as far as I can tell, that's not likely.

How do you suppose the Jews went on to occupy the land? The Canaanites were far numerically superior to them, had reliable supply bases, and were a very battle-scarred people who had much war experience fighting the Egyptians.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Perhaps we should just wish them well in a life of Canaanite conditions so they can see firsthand how the Canaanites they love so much lived.

Historically, I don't know how much is actually known about Canaanite life. In the context of the story, though, I still fail to see how it justifies genocide.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
How do you suppose the Jews went on to occupy the land? The Canaanites were far numerically superior to them, had reliable supply bases, and were a very battle-scarred people who had much war experience fighting the Egyptians.

I understand that the accepted history is that the Jews ARE the Canaanites, not foreigners.
 

Shermana

Heretic
Historically, I don't know how much is actually known about Canaanite life. In the context of the story, though, I still fail to see how it justifies genocide.

Doesn't your own texts indicate that people will be destroyed if they commit abominations? How does wanton destruction fit karmicly within your Eastern philosophy?
 

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
I have to wonder how many christians have read the whole Old Testament and have managed to keep an unchanged opinon of their god. I have to wonder how many have turned away from it after reading the OT.

It seems to me that the OT and the NT are so different that it seems their god has multiple personalities or something.

The amount of raping that occurred in the OT was horrifying.


it wasnt sanctioned by God if thats what you think.

The OT is a recorded history of an ancient world. It shows us how people behave when they dont follow Gods laws...some of that behavior was absolutely horrid! And its the same bahavior that people practice today...raping and killing is probably even more prevalent today because there are more people then back then.
 

Shermana

Heretic
Apparently Asatru is a Revivalism of Norse Paganry.

Hmmm....if I recall right, Norse beliefs indicated the way you could get to heaven was by slaughtering enemies and dying in battle. Does Asatru do away with that part?
 
Top