jarofthoughts
Empirical Curmudgeon
I don't believe anything happens after physical death, except, you know the usual physical stuff, like decomposing and so on, mainly because I don't have any reason to think otherwise.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Metempsychosis and Nietzsche's eternal return is the most plausible IMO. because through consciousness the only time we are aware of is the time we are alive or awake and sometimes dreaming which is a product of the brain. Western atheist tend to ignore the great elephant in the room and that is the role of time. Like for instance there is now estimated to be 13.7 billion years of time from the Big Bang to one's birth and it is only the fairly insignificant 80 or so years we sense any duration or it. So if you are dead for an eternity then even an eternity of time would not come to our attention, which would be highly paradoxical. Unless of course we keep randomly switching our conscious attention to other brains and totally oblivious to any memory that you have lived before. After all if all your memories of this life are obliterated with the death of your brain and unbeknown to you, you switch to another one, who is going to remind you that you have already spent your one life, dont be greedy.
I get the sense that you were trying to make a point but it seems I missed it somehow. Could you elaborate somewhat on what you mean please?
We only sense the passage of time while we are alive but periods of unconsciousness irrespective of how long we would not endure if there was no possible existence after death. Even a googolplex years (10^10^100 years) would pass us by within the blink of an eye which I think is rather paradoxical. The importance of the sense of time is like the elephant in the room.
It is not possible to for me to remember as I can remember back to the age of two but that is as far as it goes, which does emphasise the importance of the perception of time because subjectively for me that 13.7 billion years that preceded my birth passed by in the blink of an eye. I think personally the only way around this conundrum with the importance of the perception of time is the Anthropic Principle in its weaker form, which subscribes to a theory that we are simply alive in this reality because we are dead or failed to get born in millions of other alternative realities. In other words the self is necessary rather than what many people believe to be contingent, or even predetermined to be created only the once by some supernatural agent. As for the strong Anthropic principle, I cannot buy that and IMHO smacks a bit too much of intelligent design. And I certainly do not buy those believers of reincarnation who have delusions of memories of their past lives.Still not entirely sure what you mean but I'll take a stab at it anyway.
The relevant question, I think, then becomes; where were you before you were born?
I don't believe anything happens after physical death, except, you know the usual physical stuff, like decomposing and so on, mainly because I don't have any reason to think otherwise.
Scripture agrees with you.
The dead know nothing according to Ecclesiastes 9vs5,10.
Scripture shows Jesus will reign over earth for one-thousand years.
There will be a resurrection to either heaven or on earth.
But those of Matthew 25v32 have the prospect of never having to die because those alive around the start of Jesus thousand-year reign can remain alive and keep right on living right into the start of Jesus reign over earth and have the opportunity to have everlasting life in view right here on a paradisaic earth.
But don't you believe that Human also has Spirit? The Spirit is not of dust, so, it can't return to dust. So, what happens to the Spirit of people when they die?
According to old testimony, Messiah was supposed to be a King. But Jesus said that His kingdom is not of this world. Also, the Scriptures confirm that Kingdom of God is not Observable and no one would tell you where it is, for the Kingdom would be within us. (I understand it as within our heart, meaning He would conquer heart of people, and not the land or worldly power)
So, with respect to His reign, How do you believe He would reign on the earth, when He already said, His kingdom is not of this World?
Scripture agrees on all points except:
Dead Christians will be resurrected to immortal spirit beings. Those that are alive, at the time of Christ return will be instantly changed from mortal to spirit. Both groups will meet Christ in the "air" (1 Thess 4:17) not "heaven". (John 3:13). After a short period of time--within a few days---Christ and His Saints (1 Thes 3:13; Jud 1:14-15; Zec 14:5) will proceed to descend to Jerusalem (Zec 14:4; Psa 2:6-7) to set up His world ruling government. (Zec 14:9)
This parable is referring to the end of the millenium not the beginning. After 1,000 years, a 2nd resurrection to physical life (Rev 20:5, 11-13) will take place of every man, woman, and child who ever lived and did not get a fair opportunity to know and accept Christ in this life, and will be judged or evaluated, using God's Word as a guide (Rev 20:12) by Christ and His saints (1 Cor 6:2) for a separate period of 100 years (Isa 65:20). Those who accept God's way of life will be changed instantly to immortal gloried beings. Those who refuse to change, will live to the end of the 100 yr period and await their fate.
After this judgment period has elapsed, Jesus will engulf the whole earth with fire (2 Pet 3:10-12) With the fire raging, and His Saints soberly standing by, He will perform a 3rd resurrection, to physical life, of those who willfully and stubbornly refuse to accept Christ in this life and the millenium. They will be cast alive into the lake of fire along with those from the 2nd resurrection and simply cease to exist. This is described as the second death. (Rev 20:14-15; 21:8)
This is the hell so commonly referred to in the scriptures. It is a cessation of life--burned to ashes. Not an ever burning tormenting hell fire. God will never subject humans to this type of torture. No wonder Mal 4:3 states, "You shall trample the wicked, For they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet On the day that I do this," Says the LORD of hosts."
At Luke 17 v20 Jesus is addressing his enemies the religious leaders.
Surely the kingdom was not within them ['you' meaning the Pharisees]
but the kingdom was within them in the sense that Jesus was right there among them and they would not listen.
So God's kingdom is not part of or involved with earthly kingdoms or governments. Jesus and his followers were neutral to them.
Personally I don't think we get anywhere by attempting to answer the nature of the period after death by quoting the Bible and more than quoting the Qur'an or the Bhagavad Gita.
Jesus was not alive while in hell.- Acts 2vs27,32; Psalm 16v10
Adam was not offered immortality but everlasting life.
When was Jesus caught up in the clouds but at his resurrection to heaven. So Jesus 'brothers' 1 Thess 4v13 will not sleep in death as the rest but have an earlier or first resurrection.- Rev 20v6. Remember flesh and blood can not inherit the kingdom. 1st cor 15v50. So they do not take their bodies up in the air/ clouds. They 'put on' immortality.- 1st Cor 15vs53,54.
By the end of the thousand years the rest of the dead did not come to life in the sense that they did not come to 'eternal' life or 'everlasting ' life at that time. Remember one can still fall away until the end of the thousand years.
Once everlasting life [not just life] is granted all those will have proven faithful like Job and Jesus.
The fact of the matter is that no-one can tell you with any amount of certainty what happens after death, but so far the evidence points to...nothing. When you die, you are dead. The end.