The Power and Failure of Predominant Interpretations

[shunyadragon]

Hello fellow debaters,

Both in Science and Religion we have predominant interpretations of its contents.

In this video, Ghada Chehade, analyze the standing methodology in science and come up with several critical points of views.

The Power - and Shortcomings - of Predominant Interpretations

Watch this video in its full length and make your overall scientific and personal notions.

- I´ve been along some time on the RF, and I wonder how other debaters see themselves compared to the actual video content.

What are your personal notions?

Best Wishes

I consider the film sensationalist and without substance, despite having a few good relevant points..

It made an odd reference to the Big Bang Theory and alternate theories like the steady state and other theory. The fact is the alternate theories have discarded many years ago. It is like recommendations to devote funds to things like 'cold fusion,' or maybe the Genesis version of the history of the universe Actually research has gone beyond the various Big Bang theories to research such things as Quantum Mechanics, the possibility of a multiverse, and deep search of our universe, and earliest time of the universe.

 

[shunyadragon]

Cosmology is mired in the 1920's and will have to make fundamental changes.

What changes?

 

[shunyadragon]

Cladking, I can recommend you to watch this video by an American economist Professor Richard Wolff .

There is some real relevance to Wolf's warnings about our US and world economy issues, that is absent from the above video.

 

[blü 2]

You clearly missed the very points in the video OP: The "Power of Predominant Interpretations", how it works and how selfcritism and new ideas seldom comes from the established conventional science.

So what IS the very point, or points, of the video OP?

And since, asked to state them yourself, you couldn't be bothered, why should I, or anyone else, bother?

And if they're all about capitalism doing this or that, why did you post this in the Science and Religion forum?

 

[cladking]

What changes?

I believe some definitions and axioms will have to change such as adding the point as a "dimension" or making some paradigm change but it might require more than this.

I doubt a road exists to the unified field theory and believe we either have to back track to find one or build one.

There is some real relevance to Wolf's warnings about our US and world economy issues, that is absent from the above video.

All politicians now days are pandering to the masses and supporting the wealthy. This has been the situation since at least 1958.

 

[ratiocinator]

I believe some definitions and axioms will have to change such as adding the point as a "dimension"...

Gobbledygook. A point can't be a dimension, and "the point"? What point?