Unknown to many but leftist political ideals are the most anti environment of the group encouraging unnecessary industrialization for increases in population.
Source?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Unknown to many but leftist political ideals are the most anti environment of the group encouraging unnecessary industrialization for increases in population.
My point is that its glaringly obvious that Fox also does it. I can't really sympathyze with the sentiment that fox is somehow better about it. I mean if that is your opinion on it then ok. I just urge you to always, no matter the source of information, question its bias.I never said I consider FOX saintly or reliable in the sense that I would quote them in research. But I consider them a lot better than MSNBC. Also they are all "entertainment" in some sense but FOX does it more in some sense as they do not mind extended mockery.
As for misquotes I am referring to MSNBC's repeated habit of using newscasters to portray information or dialogue and chop up the audio/video or apply it to an entirely irrelevant topic.
For example, MSNBC was covering some topic some years ago. I cannot think of what it was exactly but it involved either deforestation or the creation of windmills. The Republicans accused them of trying to destroy national icons like the bald eagle and also to preserve forests. But MSNBC refused to bring up a single conservative argument because they must portray us as "anti environment." Unknown to many but leftist political ideals are the most anti environment of the group encouraging unnecessary industrialization for increases in population.
I will try and find the exact article or issue because it was the turning point which made me a conservative in the first place.
Source?
My point is that its glaringly obvious that Fox also does it. I can't really sympathyze with the sentiment that fox is somehow better about it. I mean if that is your opinion on it then ok. I just urge you to always, no matter the source of information, question its bias.
Doesn't require a source...
Is it one of the auto-cautrizing ones? I've been kicking around the idea of getting one but I don't know if its worth the eatraI am an anarchist . . . I question and dissect everything with a very accurate MO. 666 Cartesian Hyper-Plasma Scalpel.
It does if you want to convince me of anything. Not saying that's your goal, though.