Man of Faith
Well-Known Member
So, you agree?
I agree that it seems like you want gray areas except for your statement that there should be gray areas.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So, you agree?
I agree that it seems like you want gray areas except for your statement that there should be gray areas.
So you're not saying anything of substance.
I think the problem is one of having or not having any truth or standards. I have a truth to go by so I don't have gray areas.
Whether it is the truth or not, which I happen to believe it is, isn't the issue, I do have faith that it is the truth and can see real evidence in my human experience to back it up
particularly when steered by crafty antagonists.
As a side note, IIRC, the fundamentalism movement was originally meant to be inclusive and ecumenical: the idea was that by focusing on the "fundamentals" of Christianity... i.e. on what "really" mattered, they'd be able to create more cohesion between Christian groups that were divided by "unimportant" differences.