The Kilted Heathen
Crow FreyjasmaðR
No.It is a beautiful and powerful symbol in all its forms.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No.It is a beautiful and powerful symbol in all its forms.
Hitler’s Swastika is different to the Dharmic variant. It’s turned on it’s side, whereas the Dharmic one is turned on an angle. Well typically.Asian faiths try to save sacred swastika corrupted by Hitler
I think the symbol needs to be reclaimed back to its former meaning throughout Dharmic religions and faiths and shouldn't be decried or banned just because the Nazi regime had stolen and tarnished its religious significance.
Hypothetically, had Hitler used the cross instead of the swastika, would the cross itself be banned and decried?
The swastika needs to be returned and used in its orginal form and context in religion. Basically it needs to be placed back in its proper and orginal place symbolic of peace and good fortune.
The debate is weither one thinks the symbol can be fully restored and be allowed in public venues or is it now too far gone for people to accept its orginal meaning and use.
I hope the Deos will be allowed to place their religious icons back up in their Queens apartment and not be ordered to remove it.
Asian faiths try to save sacred swastika corrupted by Hitler
I think the symbol needs to be reclaimed back to its former meaning throughout Dharmic religions and faiths and shouldn't be decried or banned just because the Nazi regime had stolen and tarnished its religious significance.
Hypothetically, had Hitler used the cross instead of the swastika, would the cross itself be banned and decried?
The swastika needs to be returned and used in its orginal form and context in religion. Basically it needs to be placed back in its proper and orginal place symbolic of peace and good fortune.
The debate is weither one thinks the symbol can be fully restored and be allowed in public venues or is it now too far gone for people to accept its orginal meaning and use.
I hope the Deos will be allowed to place their religious icons back up in their Queens apartment and not be ordered to remove it.
It is a beautiful and powerful symbol in all its forms.
Try to tell that to people who have been persecuted by the Nazis.It is a beautiful and powerful symbol in all its forms.
The Swastika is still used extensively in India and can be seen in public everywhere.The debate is weither one thinks the symbol can be fully restored and be allowed in public venues or is it now too far gone for people to accept its orginal meaning and use.
Just think, you might be on some sort of FBI list.The Swastika is still used extensively in India and can be seen in public everywhere.
I remember getting a wedding invitation from India and there was big red Swastika right on the envelope. I don't know what the postman thought of it!
He's just trying to be provocative and edgy, for the attention I suppose.Powerful? Sure.
Beautiful? You gotta be ****ting me.
Powerful? Sure.
Beautiful? You gotta be ****ting me.
Yes, it's past time for people to learn how to put things into context here. My original Facebook account I had for over a decade was permanently deleted because I posted a sunwheel to honor the changing of the seasons a couple of years ago, because they thought it had something to do with violent groups, and never responded to my messages. (But then I report actual neo-Nazi groups and individuals on FB and they do nothing at all about them. Hmm. )Asian faiths try to save sacred swastika corrupted by Hitler
I think the symbol needs to be reclaimed back to its former meaning throughout Dharmic religions and faiths and shouldn't be decried or banned just because the Nazi regime had stolen and tarnished its religious significance.
Hypothetically, had Hitler used the cross instead of the swastika, would the cross itself be banned and decried?
The swastika needs to be returned and used in its orginal form and context in religion. Basically it needs to be placed back in its proper and orginal place symbolic of peace and good fortune.
The debate is weither one thinks the symbol can be fully restored and be allowed in public venues or is it now too far gone for people to accept its orginal meaning and use.
I hope the Deos will be allowed to place their religious icons back up in their Queens apartment and not be ordered to remove it.
I feel the same way about the cross and the pentagram. They are all cherished by some and hated by others, they have multiple meanings depending on what individual or culture embraces them, and they all tell deep stories of humanity and human nature.
Yes, that is beautiful to me.
Very trueAsian faiths try to save sacred swastika corrupted by Hitler
I think the symbol needs to be reclaimed back to its former meaning throughout Dharmic religions and faiths and shouldn't be decried or banned just because the Nazi regime had stolen and tarnished its religious significance.
Perfect eye openerHypothetically, had Hitler used the cross instead of the swastika, would the cross itself be banned and decried?
It's beautiful to Nazis though.The context obviously matters...as pretty much everyone has said. Claiming the swastika is beautiful when denoting Nazism...yeah, nah.
The Union Jack is noticeably different than the "Confederate flag", though.
It's beautiful to Nazis though.
An eye of the beholder thingie.
I agree and I am a first place member of the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and second place Raelian. That means if there's something the church doesn't specify, I can choose the Raelian thing.Asian faiths try to save sacred swastika corrupted by Hitler
I think the symbol needs to be reclaimed back to its former meaning throughout Dharmic religions and faiths and shouldn't be decried or banned just because the Nazi regime had stolen and tarnished its religious significance.
Hypothetically, had Hitler used the cross instead of the swastika, would the cross itself be banned and decried?
The swastika needs to be returned and used in its orginal form and context in religion. Basically it needs to be placed back in its proper and orginal place symbolic of peace and good fortune.
The debate is weither one thinks the symbol can be fully restored and be allowed in public venues or is it now too far gone for people to accept its orginal meaning and use.
I hope the Deos will be allowed to place their religious icons back up in their Queens apartment and not be ordered to remove it.
One should always live in hope.Yep. Agreed.
I'd hope the person in question isn't claiming to be a Nazi. And if they are...well...
And of course the England flag.I feel the same about the Union Jack (Flag of the UK) it has been claimed by right-wingers and racists and needs to be handed back.