Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Instead of discussing irrelevant and lack of understanding matters, prove that this model is inconsistent with science. Present your alternative view if you have any that will show the flaws in this one.
Ok Mr amiyr. My original questions were:I have not forgotten about all your original questions. They have been on my mind since. In the meantime I have been discussing on many forums where this Model has consistently attracted the most attention. There is one guy called StopS who have been following me everywhere including here to show the people that I am a nutcase. He has just answered in the post above yours. He reminds me about you but on an astronomical scale. Ask as many questions as you can. They will be tackled one at a time from the first of April 2013 and that is no April fool's joke.
A question. Do you know if the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is the same throughout the universe, or changes? Asking because if the realm we live in is accelerating due to influence from the other realms then the outer parts should theoretically accelerate faster while the center shouldnt accelerate at all. Theoretically, that is, my logic and understanding could be off (its quite likely my understanding is wrong, tbh).Nothing to disprove the Model. Resorting to throwing in irrelevant matters.
What scientific predictions does the Qur'aan make that scientists haven't discovered yet?......................
As I understand the secular science, everything is flying apart and the rate is accelarating. I do not think the reason for the acceleration is known. This always leads me to the very first question I would have wanted to know once the big bang was confirmed. Where did everything bang from? Where is the origination point? That should be easily determined and should have been well known by now. However I have never even heard an attempt at identifying where the big bang occured. Do you have any information about it?A question. Do you know if the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is the same throughout the universe, or changes? Asking because if the realm we live in is accelerating due to influence from the other realms then the outer parts should theoretically accelerate faster while the center shouldnt accelerate at all. Theoretically, that is, my logic and understanding could be off (its quite likely my understanding is wrong, tbh).
Asking where it occured is to my understanding the wrong question, because "where" implies the existence of location. It had no specific location since there was no space. A somewhat flawed analogy can be that its like blowing up a balloon. The surface of the balloon represents our universe. There is no location on the surface of the balloon the expansion (i.e. the Big Bang) started. Likewise, there is no location where the Big Bang occurred. This anology is often used to describe how the expansion works as well.As I understand the secular science, everything is flying apart and the rate is accelarating. I do not think the reason for the acceleration is known. This always leads me to the very first question I would have wanted to know once the big bang was confirmed. Where did everything bang from? Where is the origination point? That should be easily determined and should have been well known by now. However I have never even heard an attempt at identifying where the big bang occured. Do you have any information about it?
This "model" is so bad it's not even wrong. There is nothing to disprove. Putting some scribbles on a piece of paper is not "science".
It is quite baffling that you say that. But yet you have joined specifically other forums where you spend hours reading and debating as I expound this Cosmological Model. If this Model is so bad, why do you spend so much time with it.
I think the opposite is happening to you. You cannot resist it. Because you are coming across information and ideas you never encountered before. Good luck! And I take no offense.
This is what I say for now, everyday I meet people online who find all this information enlightening.
Dear Mr
I think it's an intelligent mind natural tendency to check something new. Understand it and question it or believe it. But then we have some people who will build a model by just twisting the words and facts and try to prove that Quran is the right word or science knowledge.your
Arguments may sit well with people like yourself ( blind by faith) or ignorant people. But here you are talking to diversity who knows how to question and don't follow things they think are rubbish:
If any science un quran usbtrue then inhave to saynone thing "allah must be a really bad writer".I always thank god for giving English to this world else we wud still be fighting over physics, chemistry , theory if evolution etc. imagine a world without them.
The Prophecies of the Quran run ahead of human scientific progress.
For example:
Ahmadiyya 4th Holy Khalifah writes (following is being reproduced in somewhat different format) :
The Quran and Extraterrestrial Life
"And among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and of whatever living creatures (da'bbah) He has spread forth in both And He has the power to gather them together (jam-'i-him) when He will so please." (Holy Quran 42:30)
Da'bbah covers all animals which creep or move along the surface of the earth. It does not apply to animals which fly or swim. It is certainly not applicable to any form of spiritual life. In Arabic a ghost will never be referred to as da'bbah, nor an angel for that matter.
The second part of the same verse speaks not only of the possibility of extraterrestrial life, but it categorically declares that it does exist—a claim which even the most modern scientific researchers have not been able to make so far with any measure of certainty. Yet, this is not all that this verse reveals.
Wonder upon wonder is added when we read at the end of this verse, that He (Allah) will bring together the life in the heavenly bodies and the life on earth when He so pleases.
Jam-'i-him is the Arabic expression in this verse which specifically speaks of bringing together of life on earth and the life elsewhere. When this meeting of the two will take place is not specified, nor is it mentioned whether it will happen here on earth or elsewhere. One thing however, is definitely stated: this event will most certainly come to pass whenever God so desires. It should be kept in mind that the word jama' can imply either a physical contact or a contact through communication. Only the future will tell how and when this contact will take place, but the very fact that more than fourteen hundred years ago such a possibility was even predicted is miraculous in itself.
This revelation of the Quran was made at a time when cosmology as a science was not yet born. A different age of conjectural visualization prevailed which had to go a long way before it could contemplate the existence of extraterrestrial life. Even today such claims are only found in science fiction.
.................................
The time for the full realization of this prophecy has not yet arrived, but its signs are appearing on the horizon. This demonstrates that the prophecies of the Quran run ahead of human scientific progress.
From online book Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge & Truth @ The Quran and Extraterrestrial Life
The book was first published in 1998 in UK
ISBN 1 85372 640 0
1. You had in your earlier cosmological presentation the concept of T=0 and yet at that "time" you had matter present. Matter can't exist when time does not. They are mutually dependent on each other. That is why the Bible said that God created time, matter, and space together. How is this supposed to work in your model?
2. My main question was I noticed that the point slope equation of a line appears within a long string of "proofs" for Allah, or Islamic cosmology. What is it doing there?
I do not have the capacity or time to evaluate all of your claims. I have a math degree and some philosophic interests so I must evaluate the whole by the parts I can fully understand. Those were two parts that I understand and that seem irrational to me and I had been trying for a long time to get them explained sufficiently.
Ok Mr amiyr. My original questions were:
I was promised an answer again and have still to recieve one. This has been true for months for the original promise. Why?
Many of your questions will be accompanied with delineations. I hope that you did not forget what I wrote.I have not forgotten about all your original questions. They have been on my mind since. In the meantime I have been discussing on many forums where this Model has consistently attracted the most attention. There is one guy called StopS who have been following me everywhere including here to show the people that I am a nutcase. He has just answered in the post above yours. He reminds me about you but on an astronomical scale. Ask as many questions as you can. They will be tackled one at a time from the first of April 2013 and that is no April fool's joke.
But Mr 1Robin did I not write in my post to you that I will answer by the 1st of April. read my post a few days ago. I quote;
Many of your questions will be accompanied with delineations. I hope that you did not forget what I wrote.
I have not forgotten about all your original questions. They have been on my mind since. In the meantime I have been discussing on many forums where this Model has consistently attracted the most attention. There is one guy called StopS who have been following me everywhere including here to show the people that I am a nutcase. He has just answered in the post above yours. He reminds me about you but on an astronomical scale. Ask as many questions as you can. They will be tackled one at a time from the first of April 2013 and that is no April fool's joke.
Ok Mr amiyr. My original questions were:
1. You had in your earlier cosmological presentation the concept of T=0 and yet at that "time" you had matter present. Matter can't exist when time does not. They are mutually dependent on each other. That is why the Bible said that God created time, matter, and space together. How is this supposed to work in your model?
2. My main question was I noticed that the point slope equation of a line appears within a long string of "proofs" for Allah, or Islamic cosmology. What is it doing there?
I do not have the capacity or time to evaluate all of your claims. I have a math degree and some philosophic interests so I must evaluate the whole by the parts I can fully understand. Those were two parts that I understand and that seem irrational to me and I had been trying for a long time to get them explained sufficiently.
Very well.Right Mr Robin1. From today I will give preference to your questions. I will make a list of them and start answering all the important ones one by one.